5165
Comments (672)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
HuggableBear 4 points ago +6 / -2

And that lead to how many deaths?

1
Jaqen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Radioactivity catastrophes are not measured in deaths. Radiological issues manifest in a wide range of conditions, none of which you’d scoff at if it happened to you or a loved one.

1
HuggableBear 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'd like to know more. Can you point me to some database showing all the people who have turned up with radiological issues from eating seafood irradiated by the Fukushima reactor?

1
RidingTheCaboose 1 point ago +1 / -0

The problem is that any studies on this will naturally be biased because the only people doing research are seeking to find out how many people may have been affected by irradiated seafood, not how many aren’t affected. Data scientists (often with an agenda or working in a narrative) are trying to find a link. No one is interested in funding a research effort to disprove a link. Except maybe the organized seafood industry of America. And if they fund the research it’s meaningless because it’s like Monsanto trying to tell people glyphosphate is completely harmless.

My point is that your original statement is correct. The media is lying and it has been lying our entire lives.