5077
Comments (197)
sorted by:
160
South_Florida_Guy 160 points ago +160 / -0

Obama holds the record for most bombs dropped, drone strikes and innocent civilians killed by a Nobel Peace Prize winner.

72
kaseius1 72 points ago +72 / -0

The fucking Rock and Roll Hall of Fame has more significance than the Nobel Peace Prize.

18
TrumpTrain 18 points ago +21 / -3

How many bombs were dropped in 2017 & 2018? and how does one even acquire this information, and how would one know that it's anywhere close to accurate?

16
kaseius1 16 points ago +16 / -0

Kiss's best guitarist was Bruce Kulick. But Vinnie Vincent was excellent as well.

4
guitarmastershredder 4 points ago +5 / -1

Hendrix was the all time great

4
RosettaStone 4 points ago +4 / -0

Jeff Beck is no slouch. You might enjoy Jeff Beck and Tal Wilkenfeld at the 2007 Crossroads Guitar Festival: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RdpTqyCKsAk

1
Lemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

dont forget about mark knopfler

1
tombombadil 1 point ago +1 / -0

The other Jimmy was best in terms of overall sound and songwriting IMO. (Jimmy Page)

0
BigMikesBlackCock 0 points ago +2 / -2

Bahahahahhahah..... .....hahahahahhaa...... .... hahahahhaha!!!!! He was good for his time but no where near the greatest that era guitar players Frank Zappa was way better

2
guitarmastershredder 2 points ago +3 / -1

Frank Zappa not way better...

Speed doesn’t mean better

-1
BigMikesBlackCock -1 points ago +1 / -2

Playing the same blues chords over and over on every song you ever were famous for doesn't mean better

2
Tanon 2 points ago +2 / -0

As a service member and now a GS employee of the USG deploying to IZ , AF, YE, & PK, as well as various HOA locations, during both administrations, the shot group on drone strikes’ butt hole has fundamentally clamped shut like a prom queen on a first date. Furthermore, the strike criteria to launch birds is a lot higher. That shit head and the ass clown that got fired for UT, sacrificed a shit ton of good Mates for shit.

Fuck Obama and fuck McAssclown (mcraven).

2
teleomorph 2 points ago +6 / -4

Actually every source I've seen claims that Trump has dropped bombs at a far higher rate than Obama. Particularly in Afghanistan and Iraq, but also Yemen.

I try to argue to my antiwar liberal friends why Trump is the most pro-peace president we've had in generations (he is), but this is sticking point difficult to argue with.

He did say he would "bomb the shit out of" ISIS, and he gave the military generals more free reign to accomplish their missions, which perhaps they've been doing but apparently that involved more air and drone strikes.

6
Slapstick86 6 points ago +6 / -0

If trump was bombing ISIS and defeated them, then who the hell was Obama bombing?

3
missfrew 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wedding parties.

1
FliesTheFlag 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good question Aguado

1
stvrap79 1 point ago +1 / -0

Big Mike.

5
Capitalism_Fuck_Yeah 5 points ago +5 / -0

He had to finish what Obama created and started. Can't just let ISIS butcher everyone.

3
williammcfadden 3 points ago +3 / -0

Peace is ending wars, removing troops, making deals between nations. Actually, the secret to real peace is that democracies have never gone to war against each other and never will. It's always the flawed dictators and oligarchs that need an external enemy to keep their people in fear.

1
SimPilot 1 point ago +1 / -0

sauce for that is hard to find. Obama had 8 years head start....

1
missfrew 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought it was one a day and that was bad enough.

14
NostalgicFuturist 14 points ago +14 / -0

Add the Academy Awards, the Pulitzer Prize--every award controlled by cucks giving each other handjobs and pretending it's for moral/cultural merit.

8
RosettaStone 8 points ago +8 / -0

Decades ago, I used to watch the award shows to get ideas for good movies, music, etc.

But, over time, the award shows became more about politics, to the point where they became useless as an indication of artistic value.

But I still watched the odd one, just to see what propaganda they were spewing.

The last people to figure out that the awards were no longer based on merit, were the actors and musicians themselves. It has been both funny and sad, in recent years, seeing the shows' audiences lose their enthusiasm.

Now, if you watch one of the shows, other than the truly-evil participants (like Lady Gaga), the actors and musicians in the audience just look like zombies, knowing that they're just going through the motions of a big scam.

9
NostalgicFuturist 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is what always happens under authoritarian regimes, fascist, communist, or religious (Sharia, or Puritan under Cromwell). All spontaneity vanishes, every audience is a captive audience, paranoid that they're being monitored by PC Authorities of one kind or another, including their own peers. There's no difference between "live" laughter and canned laughter. It's all scripted and prompted.

BTW, I'm old enough (alas) to remember when political statements in Academy Award speeches were rare enough to cause a bit of a scandal. During the 1978 ceremony (you probably remember this), Vanessa Redgrave (Best Supporting Actress) praised the Palestinians and referred to "Zionist hoodlums." When she left the stage and Paddy Chayefsky came on to present the next award, he delivered one of the best put-downs in the history of put-downs: "I would like to suggest to Miss Redgrave that her winning an Academy Award is not a pivotal moment in history, does not require a proclamation, and a simple ‘Thank you’ would have sufficed."

Today the low-IQ eloquence of de Niro's "Fuck Trump" is par-for-the-course. Not a scandal, a virtue signal.

The Old Gray Whore will take you down Memory Lane if you want to re-live the episode in detail.

https://archive.is/tb5R8

6
RosettaStone 6 points ago +6 / -0

Good point about the captive audiences. Hollywood is indeed like an authoritarian state -- say or do the wrong thing, and you are banished.

I do remember the Vanessa Redgrave speech. I also remember when a Native American woman went up, instead of Marlon Brando, to announce that he was declining his award, to protest the way Hollywood depicted Native Americans.

But for me, the funniest (in a sardonic sense) incident was Sidney Poitier versus Halle Berry at the 2002 Oscars.

Poitier won a special honorary Oscar for his lifetime of work. He gave a wonderful acceptance speech, thanking the people who bravely bet on him in the early days, when it was still uncertain whether audiences would accept a Black man in a leading role. Poitier pointed out that some of his most important roles, in movies such as Lilies of the Field or To Sir With Love, did not involve race as an issue. He said that was important, because it's not about race, and it should never have been about race -- it's about treating each other well as human beings.

Then, shortly after, Halle Berry became the first Black woman to win for Lead Actress. In her acceptance speech, she essentially said that it's all about race. The camera kept cutting to Poitier, and you could just see him biting his lip, so as not to shout out, and tell her what a dumb twit she was being. :-)

4
NostalgicFuturist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks for reminding me of the Brando embarrassment.

The Poitier vs. Berry incident is new to me. (It's been years since I watched the Oscars.) It sums things up perfectly, the humanity of Poitier vs.Berry's race-baiting poison, spoiled narcissism and phony virtue-signaling.

When idiot midget de Niro courageously proclaimed "Fuck Trump," the camera panned to Johnny Depp in the audience raising a defiant fist. Defying what? The Establishment? You ARE the Establishment, you overpaid dimwit!

2
RosettaStone 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL. I think the two of us would have enjoyed watching those award shows together, yelling and throwing popcorn at the idiots on the TV screen.

2
MaxineWaters4Prez 2 points ago +2 / -0

We used to have awards parties. About 10 years or so ago I stopped participating because I didn't know most of the movies.

2
RosettaStone 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know. It's even worse with the Emmy awards. The movies and TV shows that get the most awards, and the loudest applause, are all miserable politically-correct crap, that only the Hollywood insiders really like.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
22
NostalgicFuturist 22 points ago +22 / -0

Nobel Peace Prize? You mean the one he was awarded for being black after he'd barely taken office? What do you expect? It's given out by the world's dumbest cucks, the Sweegians.

11
WooHooFloo 11 points ago +11 / -0

*half black

4
Neonentity 4 points ago +4 / -0

*half white, 1/4 Arab, 1/4 black. Roughly.

2
WooHooFloo 2 points ago +2 / -0

That sounds about right.

8
GeoG85 8 points ago +8 / -0

Dude got the Nobel Prize day 1 of being elected. "Black Privelage" then proceeded to do what the pic said - ranked up such a warmongering statistic, that the Nobel Prize lost all its meaning and is now, appearingly, like the Oscars - an event for the Deep State to jack each other off.

Fuck the Nobel Prize. Make a Trump Prize. That matters for Trump Supporters. Why would Trump wanna allign himself with the likes of 0bama?

4
MaxineWaters4Prez 4 points ago +4 / -0

He was decided the winner 8 days into his presidency (January 2009), though officially awarded by ceremony at the end of the year (November 2009).

I mention this because the lefty cucks try to say "hE wOn iT aFtEr HiS fIrSt yEaR!".

2
Canuck4Trump2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good info for solid counter punch thank you

2
GeoG85 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea, and after Trump's 4 years, they try to say "Trump earned this Deep State medal that 0bama got in 1 week."

To that, I say, "Go fuck yourself." Make a Trump Award. Like TD.w, and Reddit "Reddit offered another Trump subreddit." Fuck Reddit. They had their chance. They chose Winnie the Poo Vs. Uncle Sam.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
71
deleted 71 points ago +71 / -0
23
BartoshJr 23 points ago +23 / -0

I personally have to give Woodrow Wilson a slight edge in the category of the worst U.S. presidents, although Obama is undoubtedly second on that list. More than a century later, our country still feels the negative effects of the institutions that were formally launched during Wilson's tenure; his primary disasters, of course, were the Federal Reserve and the League of Nations, the latter of which served as the precursor to the U.N.

3
tombombadil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Where is FDR on your list? I’ve always been:

  1. Wilson

  2. FDR

  3. Johnson

  4. LBJ

  5. Obama

1
CdnMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Commies

1
BartoshJr 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a pretty good list. I notice that you included Johnson twice; does the first mention there refer to Andrew Johnson, or was that just an accidental double posting of LBJ?

As for FDR, I'm not sure where I would personally rank him, seeing as how there has been a number of mediocre or bad presidents throughout American history. I will admit that he did introduce some valuable programs here and there (mainly Medicare and Social Security).

Having said that, FDR's massive government overreach simply cannot be ignored. His attempt to increase the size of the Supreme Court in order to legalize certain New Deal components remains the most egregious example of such malfeasance. Overall, I believe that FDR was much worse than many historians care to acknowledge.

Some of my other choices for terrible presidents would probably be Carter, both Bushes, James Buchanan and Herbert Hoover.

2
tombombadil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sorry, by Johnson I meant Andrew Johnson for totally fucking up reconstruction and allowing Democrats off the hook for staging an insurrection.

I thought about putting Carter on there but he was mainly bad for being a complete weakling. It got us into trouble and if he were to have won a second term things would have gone to hell, but he kind of lucked out in being overshadowed by Reagan. His terrible legacy was basically over within one year.

Depending on what happens with China, I think Clinton could make his way onto that list as well.

16
ZincOS 16 points ago +19 / -3

After Roosevelt. Roosevelt was much worse.

25
ZincOS 25 points ago +25 / -0

FDR I mean.

20
kaseius1 20 points ago +20 / -0

They're neck and neck, definitely.

Edit: Woodrow Wilson is up there as well.

12
Ched 12 points ago +12 / -0

"Even Woodrow Wilson would regret his actions and before his death, stated: "I am a most unhappy man--unwittingly I have ruined my country." Woody Woo was a huge cuck. No way he didn't know what he was doing.

17
magastrophysicist 17 points ago +17 / -0

Woodrow Wilson oversaw the creation of

  • The Federal Reserve
  • Federal Income Tax

Orders of magnitude worse than anything Obama did, and that's saying a lot!

1
ZincOS 1 point ago +1 / -0

yep

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hard to argue.

46
leakmouth [S] 46 points ago +46 / -0

From what I understand it was mostly peaceful bombing

22
deleted 22 points ago +25 / -3
20
South_Florida_Guy 20 points ago +20 / -0

For 99% of their journey, the bombs did NO damage.

6
ohamitired 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nice.

2
Tryhardneckbeard 2 points ago +2 / -0

This guy gets it...

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
4
GAGASays 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's like you work there.

1
trumplandslide 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was NOT bombing.

It was ballistic action. (actual quote)

21
Leatherwood 21 points ago +21 / -0

Obama is such an evil man. Pretends to love people of color. People believe he is a secret muslim. Yet, he bombed people of all kinds indiscriminately. He is one of the biggest mass murderers of our time. Nice legacy.

4
Iwantdon4prezagain 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you think about how ISIS behaved, it’s literally the same tactics BLM uses. BLM doesn’t behead people, but they tear down statues, burn, and terrorize, and try and claim area as their own. I believe it is designed to scare people in to leaving and fleeing to other cities, so that they can slowly take over everywhere.

1
Tryhardneckbeard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Give it some time fren, BLM is fresh and its already proven some of the Local BLM leaders are big lovers of teh Allahs.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
5
PanderjitSingh 5 points ago +5 / -0

Were he white he’d be night shift manager at a 24 hour lube shop.

12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
6
montanapede 6 points ago +6 / -0

Just wow.

10
LittleBlackKat 10 points ago +11 / -1

And we are still waiting for Hussein to produce his intaglio-printed Certificate of Live Birth. He can't produce the document because he is not an American citizen.

I still can't believe so many of my fellow Americans voted to install a muslim jihadi into the office of the President. It boggles the mind.

6
Siteless_Vagrant 6 points ago +7 / -1

They didn't. They voted for "America's First Black President". Because woke. That's why 2024 scares the shit out of me. We're getting a female president in '24, regardless. You can bet she'll be a democrat, probably black if they can swing it, and damn the qualifications.

6
popcycle 6 points ago +6 / -0

black female ...conservative republican.

just imagine the reeeeeeeeeee.

2
LittleBlackKat 2 points ago +3 / -1

That would be awful. Maybe Don Jr. will run.

1
Tryhardneckbeard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kristi Noem... not saying she'd be the greatest but at least she'd be possibly competent...

2
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

White Guilt is a helluva drug.

2
PanderjitSingh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don’t need any birth certificate to know Hussein Obama, raised in 95% Muslim Indonesia, is a Muslim and in no way American.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
3
Tryhardneckbeard 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's completely fucked is with all the wars he got us into he had a legitimate window of opportunity to start one in Iran as well but passed.

8
MayonnaiseChicken 8 points ago +8 / -0

Can’t we just drone them or something? - Hillary

8
my_pw_is_password 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hmm that makes you wonder if he was puppet for the Military Industrial Complex?

You know the warmongers that care more about selling weapons to the government than lives (American or not).

But sure, go and believe these career politicians truly think "Black Lives Matter". Give me a break! They only care about their own lives.

7
MAGA_MEME 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's over 70 bombs a day.

How do we have that many targets to bomb every single day?

3
PanderjitSingh 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pretty sure I could designate 70 targets a day very easily were that my government job.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
4
ShakeYourTrumpThang 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also droned American citizens. Look, we can be pretty sure they were shit bags, but droning a 16 year old is pretty rough.

8
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 8 points ago +8 / -0

The left showed more outrage when Trump droned a known terrorist with American blood on his hands than when Obama droned a teenage US citizen.

4
ShakeYourTrumpThang 4 points ago +4 / -0

None shall taint the name of the golden brown boy. None shall tarnish the name of the Half black Hawaiian raised in Indonesia for a bit, guy who totally went to Harvard, but we can't see his college transcripts, etc.

2
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Praise be his name

4
FragoDelight 4 points ago +4 / -0

What’s Trumps tally? We never hear him get criticized by the left for it which either means his tally is super low or they support endless war (we know they do).

5
MAG_n_KAG 5 points ago +5 / -0

NPC Automated reply: "Drumph ramped up the bombings. But nobody knows how much because he banned keeping track of bombings."

I see it everytime and its pure bullshit. Ok, lets entertain the idea that it might be true. Wouldnt there be reports of hospitals and weddings and schools regularly getting bombed like there was during Obama's campaign? Cuz we know anything can be use to hurt Trump, will absolutely be used to hurt Trump. So by the lack of any of those reportings, we can safely assume that Trump isnt just spamming the bomb button indiscriminately.

And the best part of it all? Whatever level of bombings Trump used, at least they produced results.

Obama bombings: Destabilized Syria. Allowed peak ISIS. Created a slave trade in Libya.

Trump: Stabilized Syria. Killed ISIS. Killed Salami.

2
Tryhardneckbeard 2 points ago +2 / -0

they produced results.

This is all anyone has ever fucking asked for, American's will give you 90% of their checks to fund w/e effort IF IT IS GETTING RESULTS!

4
ZincOS 4 points ago +4 / -0

He wasted our bombs. That. That... that.. There's no name for it.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
3
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

oBomber

3
Ragnar_Danneskjold 3 points ago +4 / -1

I'm just gonna say it. Yeah Obama was shit, I don't want to waste money, time, or more soldiers fighting in shithole countries (especially since I was one twice), etc.

But I don't feel even the slightest bit bad about the actual bombing itself. A world free of Islam entirely would be a much better place. Fewer Mohammedans is a good thing.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Light_HIV_Effect 3 points ago +3 / -0

For all of the left's hatred of Trump, they won't talk about the wars or the bombings, because Trump hasn't done this, and they would have to compare him to Obama.

Same reason they stopped talking about the borders and "kids in cages". Obama and Biden did that and people were catching on to that fact.

2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump just got no.inated for a nobel peace prize. The irony is Obama got one starting wars. Trump got nominated ending Obamas wars. Obama getting one made it meaningless.

2
Teeje92 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's enough bombs to earn a nobel peace prize for sure

2
patslimmy1 2 points ago +3 / -1

It's amazing how they simply ignore this.

2
Abatos 2 points ago +2 / -0

'My feelings don't care about your facts', Libs, probably.

2
Wyrmshadow 2 points ago +2 / -0

If libs want to claim Obozo killed bin laden himself, then we can easily say he dropped the bombs himself.

2
powershellder 2 points ago +2 / -0

How else could he have created refugees to bring here in record numbers?

1
LikeAWombatScorned 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ding ding ding. Also, that's how they get the oil in those countries. Does anyone have the ability to track the oil taken from these countries? No need to wait for Congress to put what you want in the budget when you can just take someone else's oil and use it for payoffs and to line your own pockets. Having your kids "work" for Burisma Holdings in the Ukraine seems like the perfect money-for-oil laundering scheme.

1
BoilingEnema 1 point ago +1 / -0

You'd have to take out a bunch of North African and Middle Eastern dictators that maintained stability... And don't forget to ensure a mostly peaceful protest takes out any loose ends.

2
Canuck4Trump2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Typical Obama..... doing one thing (bad) while saying something else they are actually Not doing (good) and then fake news amplifies the lie !!! ( muuhhh scandal free Presidency )

aka:projection (Dem strategy in almost everything they do )

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau set up by Pocohontas which shook down businesses and the fines subsidized leftist Marxist orgs

2
Tanon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just a note,

He also withdrew out of Iraq causing the rise of ISIS, withdrew conventional forces (optics you know), ordered the EJK of an AMCIT without trial including his Son, Libya, sold weapons to Syria, tripled the requirements on USSOF, cut the USSOF budget by 35%, provided “Advisors” to several countries resulting in more casualties, cut funding to the Navy, dick-kicked the same in the Pacific trying to counter China’s influence, gave a literal ton of hard cash to Iran, allowed Iran the means to make a nuke, prevented USSOF from targeting Iranian influence in AF/IZ, hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to PK despite harboring & aiding the Taliban, gave up five Taliban Commanders for a war criminal, etc. to say nothing about the VA, Solyndra, Fast & Furious, the IRS, Benghazi, DACA...

The list is epically, tragically staggering.

2
williammcfadden 2 points ago +2 / -0

The smartest, most informed liberal in 2016 had zero knowledge that he dropped any bombs. Thanks news media for keeping the audience informed.

2
King_Boobus_Toobus 2 points ago +2 / -0

He got the Nobel Mostly Peace Prize.

2
pursuitoftruth1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

And yet...after over 26k bombs, ISIS was stronger than ever. Who the hell did Osama bomb?

2
BoilingEnema 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lybia, Syria, Tunisia, and everywhere else the destabilization campaign needed a nudge. ISIS couldn't exist without a power vacuum created by our bombs and our propaganda.

1
Tryhardneckbeard 1 point ago +1 / -0

The opposition....

2
ohamitired 2 points ago +2 / -0

As Jimmy Dore said, he dropped so many bombs that we ran out. Peace prize president.

2
CrackaJack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump cleaned up the ISIS mess with one MOAB. What was he targeting?

2
TheMadManDidItAgain 2 points ago +2 / -0

CNN: Trump drops 26,171 bombs in 2016 and tries to blame Obama.

2
popcycle 2 points ago +2 / -0

trumps twitter bombs have done more good than all of obamas iron bombs.

2
RosettaStone 2 points ago +2 / -0

Obama bombed Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.

Obama got a Peace Prize.

Trump limited travel from Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Syria, Yemen, Iran, and Sudan (five of the same countries).

Trump was called a racist.

2
atomical 2 points ago +2 / -0

How many bombs has trump had dropped?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Highball 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gees no wonder the war hawks loved him.

2
lifeisahologram 2 points ago +2 / -0

Didn’t we actually run out of bombs at one point because he was bombing so much and so fast we couldn’t even keep up with production?

2
leakmouth [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes. It was deliberate in order to deplete our stock pile. #thanksobama

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Dev404 1 point ago +1 / -0

Democrats mostly keep quiet on that. I wonder where all the racism claims were when that happened.

1
GAGASays 1 point ago +1 / -0

HEY HEY. The first time he heard about any of those bombings and drone strikes was when he saw it on the news, same as you.

Doesn't that make you feel better about the Commander in Chief and President of the United States? He's only as informed as YOU are?

1
123breadman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember even 0bama acknowledged he was the worst president in history when Trump told him he was. On live television no less.

1
Bullet3250 1 point ago +1 / -0

Blame me if you want - but I don't see a problem with any of those bombings.

I would have wanted MORE BOMBS!

1
Strike_Eagle784 1 point ago +1 / -0

While I agree with the message, doess anyone have a source for Barry Soetoro creating ISIL?

1
DogFacedPepeSoldier 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who tf are we bombing in Somolia? What possible justification could there be for that in 2016?

1
PanderjitSingh 1 point ago +1 / -0

But the country he did the most harm to is the USA.

1
MAG_n_KAG 1 point ago +1 / -0

NPC Automated reply: "Drumph ramped up the bombings. But nobody knows how much because he banned keeping track of bombings."

1
behemoth887 1 point ago +1 / -0

an even more fun fact is that obama apologized to doctors with drone striked hospitals, and they rejected it, and went to the UN for retribution.

1
WakingKnowledge 1 point ago +1 / -0

Turns out they were projecting again! Obama was the terrorist and still is!