5659
Comments (127)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
87
Bawitdabadabang 87 points ago +87 / -0

First it was "It doesn't happen"

Numerous people arrested all over the country, convicted, went to prison.

Then it was "It doesn't happen enough to effect an election"

Literal election officials tasked with maintaining the integrity of our election so we don't turn into a banana republic are arrested, convicted, and will "probably" go to prison.

Now it's "mail ballots to every person that's ever been alive in the history of [insert swing state name] and we'll just see whatever the fuck happens"

People don't go around admitting to fraud. It's an impossible metric to quantify. What is more likely: (1) that it happens consistently and we don't catch it because of incompetent government or (2) that it's never happened in any meaningful way.

23
rooftoptendie 23 points ago +23 / -0

"mail ballots to every person that's ever been alive in the history of [insert swing state name] and we'll just see whatever the fuck happens"

don't forget the pets too! I'm still waiting for my cat's ballot request. Any day now.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
seejayem 3 points ago +3 / -0

I remember an article or headline the other day that said something along the lines of “there is no significant evidence of widespread voter fraud” and I thought wow that’s a really deceptive way to phrase that. They’re not denying that there’s no evidence of WIDESPREAD voter fraud and they’re not denying that there’s no SIGNIFICANT evidence of voter fraud. But they put both of the qualifiers in the statement as if to say “yeah there’s no proof that this happens across the country” well yeah no shit it would be darn near impossible to prove it because of the private, confidential nature of voting. But it’s pretty obvious that the radicals who are willing to do anything for their ideology (burn cities, commit politically motivated acts of violence) and are hell bent on destroying the current government and economic system don’t give a shit about the law that says it’s illegal to vote more than once. They are desperate to win because they haven’t won in so long.

And even if it’s a relatively small number of radicals relative to Biden’s entire voting base attempting voter fraud, it’s still enough to swing an election. If 10,000 Antifa vote an average of 100 times each then that’s a million fraudulent votes for Biden. Democrats know this and that’s why they resist election security so fiercely. The idea that voter ID laws are racist because black people have higher rates of poverty and poor people don’t have access to the internet or basic government services has been debunked. If you live in a city you have access to all of these things. The only people who I can think of in this country who would maybe not have internet or access to a nearby DPS or DMV are those in rural impoverished places like Appalachia or in the Alaskan frontier. And those people probably won’t be voting Democrat. So if anything it would lose a small amount of Republican votes (but lose a vast amount of potential fake Democrat votes so that’s why they oppose it so much).

Everyone in India has voter ID. India, a country with a population of over a BILLION people and a very large segment of the population living in poorer circumstances than anybody in the urban US. If India can have universal voter ID, there is no reason that one of the most advanced and wealthy countries in the world should not be able to. The idea that something as important and controversial as the presidential election should be left without security is completely insane. The American people have a right to know who won the election. Because a contested election will mean chaos on an unimaginable scale.

1
Krat 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. Leftists along the entire stack is involved and nobody goes after them even after being caught