posted ago by tufftoffee ago by tufftoffee +9 / -0

I might sound like a lazy cuck but hear me out. I would go to the T_D subreddit for this information that is now several years old and buried but T_D is gone and I was just assigned a paper on Net Neutrality and explain how its good or bad.

I don't have any sources on how NN is shit and Pai was based. Help.

Comments (4)
sorted by:
3
KilroyJCNJ 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tell your teacher you donโ€™t have to turn in a paper because EVERYBODY LITERALLY DIED when Net Neutrality was repealed!

๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‰Couldnโ€™t resist ๐Ÿ‘

2
julianReyes 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's a starter: Title II and the Obama administration's interpretation of the protections (or rather, rewriting of them) is not net neutrality.

Net neutrality is a general cultural principle that was used as a pretext to support the Obama administration's classification of BSPs as "common carriers," but Title II is legislation and regulation that doesn't necessarily support it. I would suggest referring to the actual text. Argue that from a legal and practical perspective it does not ensure net neutrality.

1
tufftoffee [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you so much. That start was all I needed for the paper.