5757
Comments (610)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
PoppinKREAM 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think its less caring about the bias, and moreso caring about the fact that it (unfortunately) provides more ammo to the left.

I'm not one to argue that we shouldn't get muddy as fuck if the left insists on bringing in tractors of mud to the fight.

That said, one of the reasons conservatism is inherently better than progressivism is the fact that we at least acknowledge and stick to base principles.

I personally don't give a shit about perception beyond how they affect optics, and even then it's only really a problem when it comes to elections.

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mud = ammo. They can't bring as much. And haven't trained.