153
Comments (15)
sorted by:
17
SnipedYou 17 points ago +17 / -0

Publicly traded company rails against capitalism?

What in the fuck is this world coming to?

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
TheWilderness 9 points ago +9 / -0

Help those people out with their capitalism problem. Don't buy lululemon.

8
Captain-D 8 points ago +8 / -0

And yet Lulu shit is SO expensive and they don’t make clothes for fat women.

6
BillboDickens 6 points ago +6 / -0

Lulu dropped 7% today due to 2nd half downward revision on sales outlook. They might need to revise down some more since they hate capitalism so much.

I swear, HR departments consistently work against any company they're in, not with it.

6
MagaGal 6 points ago +6 / -0

There is actually a whole website (www.decolonizing gender.com) complete with an entire curriculum (meaning it is being taught in schools). Here is their info: "Decolonizing Gender: A Curriculum is a guided reflection on gender identity, race, and colonialism. Designed for both individuals and groups, this zine asks deep and probing questions about why the gender binary is seen as the "norm", despite people who choose to exist outside of the binary having existed forever."

Now, don't you feel smarter and better edified (or do you feel a need for some brain bleach)?

6
aloha_snackbar22 [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Those are lots of words to say basically nothing.

2
John789 2 points ago +2 / -0

Have women ever created a society in history? Not that I'm aware of. Why do you think that is? Well, what did the men do to create societies? They built things, then they created an army to defend the things they built. This has been done all throughout history.

So it is assumed women would have to do the same thing. Except why would the physically weaker sex build things and then physically defend it? That doesnt make sense. Doesnt it make more sense for the women to handle the less physically demanding tasks such as taking care of children, cooking for society, teaching and nurturing. This makes much more sense, and is the exact reason why things were done this way. It is just common sense.

2
MagaGal 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is not the point I get from "decolonizing gender," though -- trust me -- I am no expert in it. As I understand it, the AOC crowd has been taught that all problems in the modern world are a result of colonialism...economic issues, race issues, gender issues, climate issues, etc. The gender-bending crowd in the curriculum above is attempting to blame gender identification issues in today's world on colonization, an idea that makes less than zero sense to me. The decolonizing gender curriculum above seems to be claiming that "people who choose to exist outside of the binary have existed forever," yet issues with gender identification have occurred only as a result of colonization (and not before). Nonsense, nonsense, nonsense times a gazillion (in my humble opinion).

4
aloha_snackbar22 [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Of course the presenter has pronouns listed in bio.

3
SJBHamilton 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fine, delist them.

3
glow-operator-2-0 3 points ago +3 / -0

decolonizing gender

wat

2
massivehairycleaner 2 points ago +2 / -0

So much hot air they need to make up words that mean nothing and tie all those words together in a theory that means nothing to explain why white male bad.