Shoe was a slightly left leaning gamergater and was pretty based who redpilled a lot of people on SJWs and feminism back then. She also dated Canadian Armored Skeptic. Real name, Greg.
If I understand it correctly, the Skeptic community are majority libertarian left wingers that are very anti-communist. Shoe was also a part of that.
Then she broke up with Skeptic not too long ago, now she's moved further left and associating with Marxists and communists who are advocating for revolution, even if she doesn't fully believe in Marxism. Now she's gone slightly SJW demanding healthcare.
Armored was really the anchor in Shoe's life preventing her from going off the deep-end associating with Marxists, anarchists and communists.
I do believe Sargon and Shoe are good friends and he's looking out for her in good faith and pointing out her errors. The only good things about her are that she's pro 2A and anti-feminist. For now.
One of her latest tweets is celebrating a woman being hired as a CEO.
... That "for now" sure didn't last very long. About 20 minutes, in fact.
(From what I gather, Skeptic dumped her because "muh long distance iz hard." So, long story short, neither of them--or at least Skeptic--wanted to actually commit to anything, relegating the relationship to a doomed teenage fancy. Turns out, relationships require more investment than occasionally buying a bus ticket, and apparently that was too much for them. Probably because they're both actually immature jackasses.)
Not on paper. On paper, they're actually anarchists--very much lib left. (Read more Marx.)
In practice, anarchy isn't really a thing: it's just a vacuum for tribes and warlords. They usually learn this somewhere in their "revolution," and then have their "totally original and amazing idea" that akshually they still have to "guide" their society to that standard, at which point they believe government and the people will become the same thing thus it somehow still counts as Marx's anarchic utopia. (Read more Engels, or literally any socialist leader as they all "discover" this amazing turn at some point in their overthrow of society.)
This is actually a pretty good gauge of where a Commie is in their development: are they a young and doe-eyed Lenin pre-revolution who wants to save the world, or a hard eyed Stalin post-revolution who knows they have to break the world to save it?
Even in their answer to how they would implement such a society, they say they will force reeducation (authoritarian left) and kill those that fail to comply/convert (authoritarian left). They seize the means of production, by force (authoritarian left) and redistribute wealth, by force (authoritarian left).
All you have to ask is, "what if someone doesn't want to 'share'?"
The reply is "force".
All of this is written as well, so don't tell me I need to read more Marx.
... Yes, that's the "left" part of that axis. That's why political compasses are crap, by the way: most of the "left-right" axis is just a reformulation of the "authoritarian-libertarian" axis, but in a way that confuses people. And no political compass asks about knock on effects or even how one plans to implement their ideas--they usually just ask very useless questions about abortion and gays.
(Let me ask you this to demonstrate: Where would King Phillip of Spain have landed? He was a hereditary monarch who refused Parliamentary control, and against the will of his people abolished the political powers of the monarchy. Politics are more complicated than a stupid four square graph can cover.)
And again, anarchy isn't a thing. Anarchism hasn't even been a real political movement since about 1900, when the Commies ate them.
We're basically saying the same thing, but I'm letting you know why they always come up as "liberal left" in these gay tests when they clearly fucking aren't. Because, on paper, they are anarchists. Just that damn reality that keeps getting in the way.
Reset the clock, another tradthot traitor.
Shoe was a slightly left leaning gamergater and was pretty based who redpilled a lot of people on SJWs and feminism back then. She also dated Canadian Armored Skeptic. Real name, Greg.
If I understand it correctly, the Skeptic community are majority libertarian left wingers that are very anti-communist. Shoe was also a part of that.
Then she broke up with Skeptic not too long ago, now she's moved further left and associating with Marxists and communists who are advocating for revolution, even if she doesn't fully believe in Marxism. Now she's gone slightly SJW demanding healthcare.
Armored was really the anchor in Shoe's life preventing her from going off the deep-end associating with Marxists, anarchists and communists.
I do believe Sargon and Shoe are good friends and he's looking out for her in good faith and pointing out her errors. The only good things about her are that she's pro 2A and anti-feminist. For now.
One of her latest tweets is celebrating a woman being hired as a CEO.
... That "for now" sure didn't last very long. About 20 minutes, in fact.
(From what I gather, Skeptic dumped her because "muh long distance iz hard." So, long story short, neither of them--or at least Skeptic--wanted to actually commit to anything, relegating the relationship to a doomed teenage fancy. Turns out, relationships require more investment than occasionally buying a bus ticket, and apparently that was too much for them. Probably because they're both actually immature jackasses.)
Why do people keep posting about this young woman? Everything about her is irritating and her voice is abrasive.
Communists are Authoritarian Left.
Not on paper. On paper, they're actually anarchists--very much lib left. (Read more Marx.)
In practice, anarchy isn't really a thing: it's just a vacuum for tribes and warlords. They usually learn this somewhere in their "revolution," and then have their "totally original and amazing idea" that akshually they still have to "guide" their society to that standard, at which point they believe government and the people will become the same thing thus it somehow still counts as Marx's anarchic utopia. (Read more Engels, or literally any socialist leader as they all "discover" this amazing turn at some point in their overthrow of society.)
This is actually a pretty good gauge of where a Commie is in their development: are they a young and doe-eyed Lenin pre-revolution who wants to save the world, or a hard eyed Stalin post-revolution who knows they have to break the world to save it?
I'm strictly talking about the results.
Even in their answer to how they would implement such a society, they say they will force reeducation (authoritarian left) and kill those that fail to comply/convert (authoritarian left). They seize the means of production, by force (authoritarian left) and redistribute wealth, by force (authoritarian left).
All you have to ask is, "what if someone doesn't want to 'share'?"
The reply is "force".
All of this is written as well, so don't tell me I need to read more Marx.
... Yes, that's the "left" part of that axis. That's why political compasses are crap, by the way: most of the "left-right" axis is just a reformulation of the "authoritarian-libertarian" axis, but in a way that confuses people. And no political compass asks about knock on effects or even how one plans to implement their ideas--they usually just ask very useless questions about abortion and gays.
(Let me ask you this to demonstrate: Where would King Phillip of Spain have landed? He was a hereditary monarch who refused Parliamentary control, and against the will of his people abolished the political powers of the monarchy. Politics are more complicated than a stupid four square graph can cover.)
And again, anarchy isn't a thing. Anarchism hasn't even been a real political movement since about 1900, when the Commies ate them.
We're basically saying the same thing, but I'm letting you know why they always come up as "liberal left" in these gay tests when they clearly fucking aren't. Because, on paper, they are anarchists. Just that damn reality that keeps getting in the way.
I accept your explanation.
Well described.
Thanks