What makes you think SCOTUS won't rule the same way? The Constitution is pretty clear that "the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed" are to be counted. Section 2 of the 14th Amendment
In this case it's because Article I Section 2 requires a census and Section 2 of the 14th amendment clarifies that to mean "counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” (this rule supercedes the 3/5ths rule that existed before the abolition of slavery.)
Souuuuthern fucking District of ever-fucking New York. Bout had it with those assholes.
What makes you think SCOTUS won't rule the same way? The Constitution is pretty clear that "the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed" are to be counted. Section 2 of the 14th Amendment
Another way of asking the same question is, how would a "textualist" (the SCOTUS nominees Trump prefers) interpret that clause of the Constitution?
Why not just add in all of Central America
What is the capital of El Salvador? Los Angeles
Southern District of New York court is an evil group that block everything the President is trying to do.
I wonder if they'll actually count them as illegals... j/k of course they won't.
Bullshit!
How can courts decide whatever they want to happen and make it so?
In this case it's because Article I Section 2 requires a census and Section 2 of the 14th amendment clarifies that to mean "counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed.” (this rule supercedes the 3/5ths rule that existed before the abolition of slavery.)
They won't answer the door