Funny how the atmosphere actually gets colder in your area when an abundance of C02 is in the air due to fires. Also note that no state outside of Idaho feels any effects of these fires. Both of these statements disprove global warming due to too much C02 being in the atmosphere. For some reason all of these "science lovers" don't understand that compounds break down in the atmopshere as they rise.
True, the sun heats up the atmosphere during the day, and the earths core heats up the atmosphere during the night with infrared heat. A greenhouse has water vapor that cools the greenhouse and prevents overheating while creating condensation. A desert has very little water molecules and Co2 in the its atmosphere to reflect the sun, which is why its much hotter than tropical climates.
...because light is blocked by a layer of ash and smoke temporarily? Temps drop real quick when seasons change, fuck they do it overnight in the desert.
CO2’s temp trapping properties work both ways. It is equally trapping heating from the ground to the atmosphere and deflecting heat from the CO2 to space. As heat rises moisture increases in the air which also deflects heat having a balancing effect. The mechanism of moisture is purposely discounted to “predict” temperature trends. It’s why predictions are so wrong all the time. They need CO2 to be the culprit but it simply doesn’t have the warming effect they need.
You'd think that when 2 of the most vocal proponents of anthropogenic climate change both bought multi million dollar mansions on the coasts, people might catch on that they're both full of shit.
You are correct but C02 is another compound in the sky that reflects the suns gamma rays (weak yes, but still some rays go back to space). All compounds reflect the sun to some degree. A desert climate has very little compounds in the air which means the sun heats that part of the atmosphere more than other areas. A tropical climate has water vapor and C02, among others, that creates condensation that actually cools the atmosphere. The earths entire climate would only get hotter if the earth was traveling closer to the sun than normal. It very well could be given everything (generally) in science and space is a cycle.
Climate change is as much a science as holistic medicine or crystal healing. Anyone that uses the phrase "settled science", especially when the actual facts don't support the conclusion they say is settled, can't say they are doing actual science.
They say climate change is a huge deal and claim to "believe science" but won't even consider nuclear power (whose waste can be recycled). Instead they want solar power, which involves mining rare elements and results in toxic waste.
Funny how the atmosphere actually gets colder in your area when an abundance of C02 is in the air due to fires. Also note that no state outside of Idaho feels any effects of these fires. Both of these statements disprove global warming due to too much C02 being in the atmosphere. For some reason all of these "science lovers" don't understand that compounds break down in the atmopshere as they rise.
Anyone who doesn’t feature the sun as the primary source of temperature on this planet has never truly experienced a day-night cycle
99% of climate scientists have probably never gone camping
Never attribute to ignorance what can easily be traced to a billionaire with a depopulation agenda.
True, the sun heats up the atmosphere during the day, and the earths core heats up the atmosphere during the night with infrared heat. A greenhouse has water vapor that cools the greenhouse and prevents overheating while creating condensation. A desert has very little water molecules and Co2 in the its atmosphere to reflect the sun, which is why its much hotter than tropical climates.
The temp dropped from 104 without fires to 85 under a thick cloud of smoke
...because light is blocked by a layer of ash and smoke temporarily? Temps drop real quick when seasons change, fuck they do it overnight in the desert.
Vegas is the same.
CO2’s temp trapping properties work both ways. It is equally trapping heating from the ground to the atmosphere and deflecting heat from the CO2 to space. As heat rises moisture increases in the air which also deflects heat having a balancing effect. The mechanism of moisture is purposely discounted to “predict” temperature trends. It’s why predictions are so wrong all the time. They need CO2 to be the culprit but it simply doesn’t have the warming effect they need.
I've read that before. Their science is a scam.
You'd think that when 2 of the most vocal proponents of anthropogenic climate change both bought multi million dollar mansions on the coasts, people might catch on that they're both full of shit.
You are correct but C02 is another compound in the sky that reflects the suns gamma rays (weak yes, but still some rays go back to space). All compounds reflect the sun to some degree. A desert climate has very little compounds in the air which means the sun heats that part of the atmosphere more than other areas. A tropical climate has water vapor and C02, among others, that creates condensation that actually cools the atmosphere. The earths entire climate would only get hotter if the earth was traveling closer to the sun than normal. It very well could be given everything (generally) in science and space is a cycle.
A single common volcano eruption produces more Carbon emissions than humans do in several years and the planet cycles through it no problem at all.
Climate change is as much a science as holistic medicine or crystal healing. Anyone that uses the phrase "settled science", especially when the actual facts don't support the conclusion they say is settled, can't say they are doing actual science.
They say climate change is a huge deal and claim to "believe science" but won't even consider nuclear power (whose waste can be recycled). Instead they want solar power, which involves mining rare elements and results in toxic waste.