310
Comments (22)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
Cyber1776 7 points ago +9 / -2
3
Foxbat40 3 points ago +3 / -0

So a building that is on fire for 7 hours will collapsed due to structural damage. Metal parts warp and shift at different rates to concrete parts causing connections to shear.

Hot flaming debris falling from overhead really does a lot of damage. This doesn't mean that Rumsfeld didn't steal 2 trillion dollars. It just means that a building collapsed due to a fire that was never extinguished.

4
Johnny_Treason 4 points ago +5 / -1

So a building that is on fire for 7 hours will collapsed due to structural damage >

Complete and utter bullshit. High rise buildings with reinforced steel cores don't just suddenly collapse at free fall speed because of fire.

1
Foxbat40 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you point out one that has been on fire for 7 hours and didn't collapse?

1
Johnny_Treason 1 point ago +1 / -0

The One Meridian Plaza fire in 1991.

2
fapoo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looking at the simulation and the actual video, it doesn't look the same at all. The real video just looks like every other building demolition I've seen.

We are not being told the truth about this.

2
jamsycramsitinhisass 2 points ago +4 / -2

I hope you see through that trash. NIST is full of crap. Bad science.

1
Cyber1776 1 point ago +3 / -2

Not an argument.

3
jamsycramsitinhisass 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree. That video is clearly wrong.