1589
Comments (41)
sorted by:
57
Oback_Barama 57 points ago +57 / -0

And in those 19 years, do you know the number of terrorists and hijackers that have been successfully apprehended during the TSA screening process?

Exactly Zero.

40
deleted 40 points ago +40 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
11
MortyArk 11 points ago +11 / -0

Simple, cheap, and elegant solutions very rarely make anybody money.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Farage_massage 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every commercial airliner has a reinforced door to the cockpit now anyway.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everybody has that

1
JovialKlutz 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, that prevents highjackings but not bringing bombs or weapons onto airplanes which is mostly meant to be the point of the TSA.

That's not to say that the TSA and airport security all around hasn't gotten ridiculous nowadays. It's always the little stuff that they don't like, like USB drives in my backpack or a button on my damn sweater.

1
Get-schlonged 1 point ago +1 / -0

Plot twist. Shoe bomb.

I hate tsa, but that’s what the shoe thing was About

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Get-schlonged 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they stopped trying. But none that i know of

13
DrCowboyPresident 13 points ago +13 / -0

They got a brand new permanent Government Union out of it though, so they can leech off us forever!

Yeah, pensions!

4
HillarysBeaverMunch 4 points ago +4 / -0

The 9/11 terrorists did not smuggle weapons onboard. The weapons were propositioned by ground crew.

This fact has gone down the memory hole.

3
NvJohansson 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why do l have to pay 5$ for a bottle of water in a foreign country's airport terminal because l can't bring my own bottle again?

26
GingerMinky 26 points ago +26 / -0

Jesus, that put it into perspective.

18
HillarysBeaverMunch 18 points ago +19 / -1

As patriots, we all need to make a minor stink when going through TSA. Not enough to get in trouble or miss our flights, but enough to alert the normies around us that the fondling behavior is wholly illegal and immoral, especially in their fondling of kids.

What I do is, when given the option to go thru the scanner or the old-style metal detector, say loudly "oh, I can't go through that. They cause cancer. There's a reason they are illegal in Europe and children are excused from going through them. Plus, they can record your naked body for later use."

I am often times pulled aside to be fondled. This is where I hit my stride. "You just touched my penis. That's my penis" I say loudly. I never disobey their orders, and I never pull away. I just make the statement.

They ask me to raise my arms for a second while they pass the wand over me. This is where the optics come into play: When they tell me I can lower my arms, I don't. They then tell me again, and I say "nope, I'm good right here" so that everyone can see me being accosted. Hands held high is a strong visual: I am the victim.

It is not OK that TSA homosexuals at SFO are allowed to run their hands over children. So whenever I see it, I casually comment "That's assault. Anywhere else and that person would be arrested". I don't say it to the TSA people, or really anyone. I just make the statement loudly as I am putting on my belt.

My audience is the people around me, too timid to make a stand. I hope to put the kernel of resistance in their minds.

Note I am always 100% compliant and obey TSA orders. I've never, ever gotten in trouble for doing this.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
HillarysBeaverMunch 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hey, I'm not doing this to be a bad person, I just want to help out any way I can that does not make me miss my flight!

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
HillarysBeaverMunch 7 points ago +7 / -0

Wow, that is a great idea. From now on I will say "You just touched my labia. That's my flappy labia".

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lmao

16
rebelde_sin_causa 16 points ago +16 / -0

I dealt with the new TSA regs and my proportional distaste for airports by stopping flying (with one exception in all that time)

I hate to think of how this translates into how I deal with the mask thing. It seems to generally mean isolation.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

War on drugs is great...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know. We could make Karens harmless overnight if we shrank the government.

12
FamburgerHelper 12 points ago +12 / -0

I just tweeted a similar thought! I don't have TV, I just stream but since I don't have Netflix and am quitting Amazon when my Prime account expires in January, I've been watching Pluto & IMDB free streaming TV and they have ads in which people are wearing masks, normalizing them for permanence?

8
PoorMansPsychiatrist 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes. TV ads are trying to normalize the masks too.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
0
christianknight 0 points ago +1 / -1

Cut the cable.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
2
christianknight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Vaccine = no mask

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
6
SimplePede 6 points ago +6 / -0

Show me a petition to fire all TSA pricks and I'll sign it.

Here's the shit I've had stolen from me right before my very eyes:

+Harmonica +Maple Syrup +Toothpaste +Beach Sand +Mountain Dew +Safety razors +Shampoo +Foam knife

Seriously fuck the TSA

4
BadManOrange 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's a good point, but most people don't take flights every day. The average person probably takes like 4 flights per year (let's say two trips, one each way). So for most people, taking off their shoes for a couple minutes is a minor inconvenience compared to the mask. People have to go into public almost every day, it's a huge difference.

2
tdwinner2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Joke's on you: if you pay you don't have to take your shoes off.

1
sun_wolf 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ask leftists how long they are willing to wear the masks. They won’t be able to give an answer because the corporate media hasn’t told them. So float some ideas. Will they wear them until 2024? Will they wear them until 2030? What about 2050? They won’t likely be able to answer. I think some of them are willing to wear the masks forever, as a permanent change to society. But they are still sheepish about it. They don’t really want to, and they don’t really expect it, but they are willing to submit and comply. But it is good to get them thinking about this.