6369
Comments (452)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Durham Report for one. I know you're a lefty so you probably don't care about illegal spying on a presidential candidate, and the cover up that we've witnessed. But people are gonna be punished. Brennan at the least, but he's already starting to flip.

Insurrection Act against the domestic terrorists burning, looting, and murdering.

Crackdown on social media censorship is just getting started.

And I doubt you keep up with actual policy regarding the fed, but Trump has been quietly sticking it to them as well. That may be a pipe dream though, I don't think Trump is that much of a disruptor.

You know, you can engage us in normal conversation. You don't have to really be a Trump supporter to post here. But don't act like a jackass.

Also, can't forget that Trump has been pissing off the MIC. Gloves come off for the establishment, which is mostly represented by the Dems and a good portion of Republicans, as well as the beuarocratic establishment. I warned you because this is going to put a stop to the far left bullshit. Regarding the MIC, Trump recently: "we don't have to be in the ME, but we're there because we want to protect Israel". Gonna keep giving those symbolic peace deals in the ME while we pull out.

And two more SC justices and we're coming for your abortions. Can't wait.

-3
DontTouchMeThere -3 points ago +1 / -4

Ok, let’s go through this because some of it is rather interesting. You realize the original Russia probe by the Dems as well as Durham’s report is one big political circle jerk, right? First of all, I’m sure somebody will go to jail. It will probably be one random person within the FBI and then what? You claim victory on that? All that’s going to lead to is the Dems launching a counter investigation to your investigation and when the Dems counter investigate Trump’s team will come back with an investigation into that. It’s all non-sense, from the jump.

There is literally a 0% chance the Insurrection Act is invoked. What’s Trump going to do? Launch land and naval force to 50 cities all over the country? You realize that will only spark more protests. It’s an insanely stupid move. If it was isolated to one city I could maybe see it, but all you’re doing is creating more tension throughout the country. When was it last used? In 1992 with Bush in LA? You’re talking about an Act that’s over 200 years old and hasn’t been used in 30 years. It’s a lose/lose for him and he’s only saying it now to rile up his base under the “Law & Order” mantra.

Social media censorship? I don’t even know what you mean by that. Are you referencing extreme wings getting censored? What is this “crackdown” you speak of? I’m on 3 social platforms almost daily, haven’t noticed a crackdown of any sort going on.

Both Trump and the Fed are predicting the best economic year in 30 years in 2021, what sense does it make for him to poke the bear there? They are saying the exact same thing for next year.

I’ll have the educate myself more on this MIC business, although it sounds like the same stuff conspiracy theorists have been saying for decades. I’m sure that New World Order is right around the corner, they’re definitely coming soon.

2
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Obviously I realize the original Russia garbage was BS. I mean, you're honestly about 4 years late on the themes of what's been going on. Unaware or social media censorship? Really? That's only about 10 years behind.

It's a debate here whether or not more people will go to jail. Trump is patient and he holds grudges. He loves revenge. His words. If Durham isn't the guy, bring along somebody else. The facts of the case are there. The Dems have successfully stalled for 4 years, but they've also outed themselves. We'll wait and see. We can go back and forth on whether arrests will be made but neither of us know. I'd take the over on 1 person being arrested. We've already had one indicted.

Insurrection Act if it continues, absolutely. It's stupid to someone like you, and that's why the gloves can't come off until the second term. Does that click with you at all? With what the Dems are openly planning and talking about right now, It's almost guaranteed. It's a lose/lose before the election. After the election, it's him doing what should absolutely be done. Most here believe it's the right move. I do. But you just explained yourself why he can't do it yet. What exactly would he lose in the second term? Would the media stop giving him good press?

As for you're lack of awareness of social media censorship, that's honestly baffling. You realize we are on TDW, right? Do you understand the significance? Facebook is censoring "premature announcements" of who wins the presidency. Google is a monopoly. I mean, there have been senate hearings about this. To say you have never heard about social media censorship just shows how completely out of the loop you are. I don't even know where to point you to to get started.

Trump has already been going after the fed. That's what I'm telling you. I'm not saying he's going to. I'm saying he's already started.

Trump/MIC being conspiracy theories. Trump has been calling them out in his speeches.

https://youtu.be/0Qqc4pvKQok

He's mentioned them in his last two speeches and a couple other times.

Welcome to TD but you need to realize you're way behind.

-2
DontTouchMeThere -2 points ago +1 / -3

I’m sure I can always be further educated, politically, socially, economically, etc. If you’re the smartest man in the room you’re in the wrong room. With that said, calling me way behind and out of the loop is ignorant.

As far as the social media thing goes, I don’t use Facebook because this isn’t 2006. Log off that dumb shit, who the fuck cares what theY post and don’t post? If you get any of your news or information from Facebook you’re either a mental midget or somebody’s grandmother, stop worrying about them. I’m not sure what you’re referencing about Google being a monopoly but if you think Trump is going to bust them up in some sort of way I have a bridge in Brooklyn to sell you.

I understand what you’re saying about the Insurrection Act, we simply don’t see it the same way. This isn’t an “isolated” problem in one area or one city. If he invokes it he’s going to wind up playing Whack-A-Mole because when he gets one area to calm down through force another will pop up. People are angry over injustice in the COUNTRY, not in one city. It made sense for Bush to use it in ‘92 because the riots were in LA due to an LA issue, this isn’t that. Trump invokes it to stop one protest, two more will pop up, he’ll wind up chasing his own tail and will look foolish.

I’m not going to further engage with the MIC stuff for two reasons. 1) like I said previously I have to educate myself further on it, and 2) conspiracy theorists just move the goal posts to fit their narrative. If nothing happens next year the narrative just turns into “just you wait, it’s coming the year after that”, and so on and so forth. They don’t have to be held accountable because they can always push it off to “it’s going to happen soon”.

And for the record I didn’t say 1 person arrested, I said 1 going to jail. There’s always a fall guy.

2
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not on any social media, thanks. It's just funny the tongue-in-cheek approach you brought when you actually began having a conversation. Like you were going to entertain my thoughts. Saying you're unaware about social media censorship is like saying you're unaware that there are riots going on. Genuinely. It's been a huge story for years. You really need to look into this.

We're talking about the government forcing them to disclose their algorithm. And oversight. The thing is, you're really so far behind it's kind of impossible to have a discussion about it. We've both been dicks to each other but I'm not even saying that to be a dick. I don't know where to start. This has been a pretty important issue for some time.

Edit- I remembered, the actual issue is them being a publisher or not. If they are labeled a publisher, they will be able to censor legally but face lawsuits. If they are public forum, like they claim, they cannot censor at all. They have been enjoying the freedom from lawsuits of a public forum but acting as a publisher. Trump has talked about this and asked the senate to look into it. Recently.

What's your answer for the continued riots the Dems are planning then? Would the Insurrection Act be justified if it ends up working? The gloves are off means we don't care anymore about the media saying Trump looks "foolish". They say it anyway.

Your basic argument is that the Insurrection Act can't work against multiple riots. Yeah, I'm pretty sure it can. Hit the most affected ones. And for the record, people aren't mad about injustice in this country. They're fucking losers who hate America.

Nobody is moving goalposts on the MIC. Trump has been the most anti war president in decades. He continues to withdraw troops from all over. No new wars. He resisted serious conflict in Syrian when the MSM was begging for it. You're wondering about the future when he's already started working against the MIC. Why do you think Mattis, with his new private military contractor firm gig, is now an outspoken Trump critic? And Bolton? Wake up dude. Defeat Disinfo is a private company run by former Army General McChrystal that uses DARPA-level pentagon technology to run propaganda against Trump for the election.