3867
Comments (497)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
25
Nonredneck4 25 points ago +30 / -5

i lived because i was in london on business, the two guys that took my place at the monthly market data meeting died along with everyone at the meeting. They could have been saved by helicopters if the city was not already cucked. every year i used to go down to ground zero to curse out the truthers. Some years they called the cops on me, they did not seem to mind.

12
deleted 12 points ago +20 / -8
3
deleted 3 points ago +6 / -3
-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-3
Litecola -3 points ago +3 / -6

Ackshully experienced people IRL really DO say it's a demolition. Simple test- look up videos of failed demos, there are tons. Amazing that an asymmetrical impact and fire wood cause such a perfect symmetrical collapse.

I know families who lost power there, they agree with this assessment, along with many IRL demo experts and pro engineers, and want answers too.

Approach another way, follow the money- sudden insurance purchases, stock moves. Or another way, certain politicians who didn't appear for that mornings' meetings, without cause. Or the art installation and dancing Israelis. Or the weird "test" of the radar/defense systems that led to shutting of entire sectors and misrouting the scrambled fighters.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Litecola 1 point ago +1 / -0

My family comes from a very earthquake prone zone, and has generations of architects and engineers. You don't know what I've personally seen or done, so cut the straw man ad hominem and address the facts.

I was putting it in such a way that people could easy research. Demos happen neatly unless some little thing goes wrong and then it's a tree fall. Jet fuel doesn't melt steel. Plasma and radioactivity such as were recorded in the bases of the rubble don't occur naturally from such a fire.

-6
Dashmoomoo -6 points ago +12 / -18

no thermite POURING out of the buildings right before collapse? Two steel towers designed to withstand airplane impacts?

Right...

17
Guruchild 17 points ago +23 / -6

They withstood the impacts, you fucking parasite. They did not withstand the aftermath. Get the fuck out of here.

3
Ithrowawaay 3 points ago +5 / -2

A feat in itself.

No building is designed to take a hit of 200,000 lbs, at 500 knots, with 11,000 gallons of kerosene on board.

Spez: Rough calculation is equivalent to 33,000 sticks of dynamite in kinetic energy alone from the impact, not accounting for accelerant.

Spez^2 downvote all you want, doesn’t make it false.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
8
CuomoisaMassMurderer 8 points ago +8 / -0

How would a helicopter have helped?

How was the city cucked? Why would that prevent helicopter use?

Why would you "curse out the truthers?"

4
gillonba 4 points ago +5 / -1

I'm curious about the helicopters; were there landing pads on top of the buildings that they were not allowed to use?

5
TommyLasordasBallBag 5 points ago +5 / -0

Visibility would be my guess. Also F16s were scrambled after the second plane hit. If a large bird flew near there they'd probably have swatted it with aamraams