3867 I was going through 9/11 videos. This one hits hard. (youtu.be) posted 216 days ago by DefenestrateDatAss 216 days ago by DefenestrateDatAss +3867 / -0 497 comments share 497 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (497) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ -6 ▼ – Dashmoomoo -6 points 216 days ago +12 / -18 no thermite POURING out of the buildings right before collapse? Two steel towers designed to withstand airplane impacts? Right... permalink save report block reply ▲ 17 ▼ – Guruchild 17 points 216 days ago +23 / -6 They withstood the impacts, you fucking parasite. They did not withstand the aftermath. Get the fuck out of here. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 3 ▼ – Ithrowawaay 3 points 216 days ago +5 / -2 A feat in itself. No building is designed to take a hit of 200,000 lbs, at 500 knots, with 11,000 gallons of kerosene on board. Spez: Rough calculation is equivalent to 33,000 sticks of dynamite in kinetic energy alone from the impact, not accounting for accelerant. Spez^2 downvote all you want, doesn’t make it false. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -1 ▼ – deleted -1 points 215 days ago +1 / -2 ▲ 1 ▼ – Ithrowawaay 1 point 215 days ago +2 / -1 Ohh studies! Doesn’t have to melt steel. All it has to do is heat it up enough to cause it to fail under an unexpected and unsupported load of a quarter million pounds traveling at over 500 mph. No building is designed to handle something like that. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -3 ▼ – Dashmoomoo -3 points 216 days ago +1 / -4 Doesn't prove it wasn't an inside job in anyway at all. Also, check your emotions, then, shove em up your ass. RECONCILE. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – Ithrowawaay 4 points 216 days ago +4 / -0 You’d have to prove it was an inside job first. And “inside“ is quite a bit of latitude. Did they allow it to happen? Perhaps. Was it loaded with thermite? No. Because it didn’t have to be, because no building survives 33k sticks of dynamite. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – Ithrowawaay 4 points 216 days ago +4 / -0 And now with the edits. Leftist cuck, confirmed. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ -1 ▼ – deleted -1 points 215 days ago +1 / -2 ▲ 0 ▼ – deleted 0 points 215 days ago +1 / -1 ▲ 1 ▼ – tombombadil 1 point 215 days ago +1 / -0 “You’re young enough to be my next victim” Ummm... what the fuck?? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 215 days ago +2 / -0
no thermite POURING out of the buildings right before collapse? Two steel towers designed to withstand airplane impacts?
Right...
They withstood the impacts, you fucking parasite. They did not withstand the aftermath. Get the fuck out of here.
A feat in itself.
No building is designed to take a hit of 200,000 lbs, at 500 knots, with 11,000 gallons of kerosene on board.
Spez: Rough calculation is equivalent to 33,000 sticks of dynamite in kinetic energy alone from the impact, not accounting for accelerant.
Spez^2 downvote all you want, doesn’t make it false.
Ohh studies!
Doesn’t have to melt steel. All it has to do is heat it up enough to cause it to fail under an unexpected and unsupported load of a quarter million pounds traveling at over 500 mph.
No building is designed to handle something like that.
Doesn't prove it wasn't an inside job in anyway at all.
Also, check your emotions, then, shove em up your ass. RECONCILE.
You’d have to prove it was an inside job first.
And “inside“ is quite a bit of latitude. Did they allow it to happen? Perhaps.
Was it loaded with thermite? No. Because it didn’t have to be, because no building survives 33k sticks of dynamite.
And now with the edits.
Leftist cuck, confirmed.
Ummm... what the fuck??