4512
Comments (249)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
35
winochamp 35 points ago +37 / -2

Is he? I know he leans liberal but he’s always seemed fair, and orders of magnitude better than any mainstream media host. His response to everything critical of Biden won’t be “did you know that was facets checked and false and just Russian propaganda?”.

I guarantee you powers that be are already quickly devising a plan to threaten/blackmail Rogan into saying he won’t do the debate, and won’t have trump on. If he agrees to have trump on, I guarantee there’s enormous media backlash and all kinds of slanderous/libelous articles written about Rogan.

5
VoteCyborgTrump2040 5 points ago +9 / -4

He has either been a snake the entire time, or he sold out some time before he tried to unperson Alex Jones and say he wouldn't have him on anymore.

Been following him for decades. I don't trust him even a little bit anymore. You guys are welcome to your own opinions though. I don't even think it will happen, but I predict that if it does, it will be a setup.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
4
VoteCyborgTrump2040 4 points ago +5 / -1

Yeah, he accepted Alex back after the huge backlash. Doesn't matter though, that's when he changed. He started having NYT reporters on his show, he had Jack Dorsey on and didn't press him at all. Then when people got outraged about it, he had Tim Pool on with him again, and Jack brought his lawyer. Which, btw, notice how he didn't need his lawyer when it was just him and Joe? Almost as if he knew he had nothing to fear when it was just him and Joe.

Anyway, feel free to trust him if you want, but I'm not going to.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
PepesCovfefe 3 points ago +3 / -0

How could he set him up? If we can’t answer that, it’s not really a viable outcome.

2
VoteCyborgTrump2040 2 points ago +5 / -3

There's literally infinite ways he could be set up. Not being able to come up with specifics about how it will happen doesn't mean it won't. But at the very least, Trump should treat it as a hostile MSM interview if he does it.

Here's a scenario for you. Suppose there is some unreleased image or audio clip of Trump that they are sitting on. They give it to Rogan to play/show on the podcast. Could be presented in a misleading context and make him look bad.

Let's say Rogan shows pictures of him and Maxwell or something, and then says he talked to someone who said Trump was there and did something bad, etc. Even if it's complete bullshit, it could be very bad.

There's a million ways he could be set up. This is just some bullshit I'm thinking up off the top of my head.

I'd like to be proven wrong, but there is 2 months to go, and democrats are desperate. A misstep now could be fatal.

1
TrumpRules 1 point ago +2 / -1

Im with you Cyborg, Rogans a traitor.

1
PepesCovfefe 1 point ago +2 / -1

Good points. So, you think it’s not a good idea for him to go on?

2
MrStaticElectricity 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well then we'd have an entertaining four hours as Trump debates Rogan, instead of Biden saying unintelligible ramblings and Trump raising eyebrows and pointing his finger.

2
PatrickSebast 2 points ago +2 / -0

He has Alex Jones on the schedule of upcoming guests on his website.

2
VoteCyborgTrump2040 2 points ago +4 / -2

He had Alex on more than once after that too, but before he moved to Spotify, because the backlash was too big. He has not had Milo, Gavin McInnes, etc back on there. If he can get away with it, he unpersons anyone the establishment doesn't like.

Alex has also been thoroughly discredited at this point, and unpersoned in every other regard, so it no longer matters. He isn't allowed on any social media. So it makes no difference if he rambles about intergalactic child molesting vampires.

That's not the point. Joe either changed or revealed his true colors around that time. Feel free to trust him if you like, but I'm not going to be dumb enough to do it again. When someone shows me who they are, I don't ignore it. I was here telling people not to trust Lindsey Graham when they were calling him 2.0. Now people here have finally come around and realized there was no 2.0. I realized first what Chaffetz was when he was on CNN with a scheduled interview when the pussy tape dropped. Never trusted him again, and realized that Gowdy is the same thing. All talk, no action, fake personality doing theatre.

But like I said. I don't know for certain, and you can have whatever opinions you want. I'm just not going to trust him personally.