4512
Comments (249)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
VoteCyborgTrump2040 2 points ago +5 / -3

There's literally infinite ways he could be set up. Not being able to come up with specifics about how it will happen doesn't mean it won't. But at the very least, Trump should treat it as a hostile MSM interview if he does it.

Here's a scenario for you. Suppose there is some unreleased image or audio clip of Trump that they are sitting on. They give it to Rogan to play/show on the podcast. Could be presented in a misleading context and make him look bad.

Let's say Rogan shows pictures of him and Maxwell or something, and then says he talked to someone who said Trump was there and did something bad, etc. Even if it's complete bullshit, it could be very bad.

There's a million ways he could be set up. This is just some bullshit I'm thinking up off the top of my head.

I'd like to be proven wrong, but there is 2 months to go, and democrats are desperate. A misstep now could be fatal.

1
TrumpRules 1 point ago +2 / -1

Im with you Cyborg, Rogans a traitor.

1
PepesCovfefe 1 point ago +2 / -1

Good points. So, you think it’s not a good idea for him to go on?

2
VoteCyborgTrump2040 2 points ago +3 / -1

I don't think it's a good idea, no. To head in to an unknown environment, with someone who there is a good chance is part of "shadowgate" (or whatever you want to call the program where US intel either seeds or recruits media personalities) so close to the election, when democrats/deepstate are obviously still sitting on their biggest bombshells, waiting for the right time, seems like it would not be a good idea to me.

But that's going to depend on what Trump and his staff know that we might not. Maybe it is a good idea, but from where I'm sitting, it's an enormous risk, and I'm failing to see the major payoff that would come from it.