Point out something specific that you think I have missed. I think you're just having a knee-jerk reaction to things that I'm saying which make you uncomfortable, and I most certainly have been reading your replies. I'm just asking for clarity on some of your points.
What's making me uncomfortable? You're denying any comparing whatsoever to a computer while asserting without evidence that there's a soul governing things. I do believe that there's a soul or life force which is in the driver's seat (or the user to go with the computer analogy) and I also believe that the mind operates very much like a computer, although not an exact 1:1 replica however it has many similarities when it gets incorrect, partial or omitted data. You might "intuitively" know something but I think that's also explainable per past experiences, morals, observations, etc. What's so hard to understand about that? I don't think we are in disagreement yet it seems like you're trying to enforce one here for argument's sake.
You're denying any comparing whatsoever to a computer while asserting without evidence that there's a soul governing things.
No, I asked if you wanted to have the conversation - I have plenty of evidence, if you want to see it:
Most people don't like to discuss that side of things; let me know if you would like to.
Remember that sentence? It is exactly this kind of thing I was asking for after you said:
OK, it's clear that you're not reading my posts now.
To which I responded:
Point out something specific that you think I have missed.
Who is actually making assertions without evidence? Now to get back on track with a question worth answering, would you like to have the discussion about free will and the supernatural?
It looks like somebody downvoted all of my replies in this thread. If that was you, you're a fucking piece of shit and I don't want to hear from you anymore.
Point out something specific that you think I have missed. I think you're just having a knee-jerk reaction to things that I'm saying which make you uncomfortable, and I most certainly have been reading your replies. I'm just asking for clarity on some of your points.
What's making me uncomfortable? You're denying any comparing whatsoever to a computer while asserting without evidence that there's a soul governing things. I do believe that there's a soul or life force which is in the driver's seat (or the user to go with the computer analogy) and I also believe that the mind operates very much like a computer, although not an exact 1:1 replica however it has many similarities when it gets incorrect, partial or omitted data. You might "intuitively" know something but I think that's also explainable per past experiences, morals, observations, etc. What's so hard to understand about that? I don't think we are in disagreement yet it seems like you're trying to enforce one here for argument's sake.
No, I asked if you wanted to have the conversation - I have plenty of evidence, if you want to see it:
Remember that sentence? It is exactly this kind of thing I was asking for after you said:
To which I responded:
Who is actually making assertions without evidence? Now to get back on track with a question worth answering, would you like to have the discussion about free will and the supernatural?
You're the only person on here who is taking my analogy way too seriously and sucked the fun out of it. So, no.
It looks like somebody downvoted all of my replies in this thread. If that was you, you're a fucking piece of shit and I don't want to hear from you anymore.