"This time, the bans will be designed based on the lessons learned from the 1994 bans."
The primary lesson was that the crime rate using rifles ('assault' or not) is essentially zero. So based on that lesson, is the plan not to waste time, money, and violate the Second Amendment, and instead stop trying to pass these asinine restrictions?
"Federal law prevents hunters from hunting migratory game birds with more that three shells in their shotgun. That means our federal law does more to protect ducks than children."
I'm like 70% sure hunting children isn't legal at all.
If they want to protect children, how about not killing them with their abortion mills?
Strange premise, but OK. What's the bag limit on children Joe?
"This time, the bans will be designed based on the lessons learned from the 1994 bans."
The primary lesson was that the crime rate using rifles ('assault' or not) is essentially zero. So based on that lesson, is the plan not to waste time, money, and violate the Second Amendment, and instead stop trying to pass these asinine restrictions?
"Federal law prevents hunters from hunting migratory game birds with more that three shells in their shotgun. That means our federal law does more to protect ducks than children."