"This time, the bans will be designed based on the lessons learned from the 1994 bans."
The primary lesson was that the crime rate using rifles ('assault' or not) is essentially zero. So based on that lesson, is the plan not to waste time, money, and violate the Second Amendment, and instead stop trying to pass these asinine restrictions?
"This time, the bans will be designed based on the lessons learned from the 1994 bans."
The primary lesson was that the crime rate using rifles ('assault' or not) is essentially zero. So based on that lesson, is the plan not to waste time, money, and violate the Second Amendment, and instead stop trying to pass these asinine restrictions?