3697
Comments (185)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
JustTheNews 4 points ago +6 / -2

no shit, im not talking about uniting with criminals, but if people came around here attacking women and kids the neighborhood, all colors of people would defend these people and the chances of more than 50% of the mob leaving the neighborhood would be slim.

1
Paul_Revere 1 point ago +1 / -0

if people came around here attacking women and kids the neighborhood, all colors of people would defend these people

I wouldn't bet anyone's life on that.

1
JustTheNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

i would...because i know at least 3 people one black one mexican and a white dude who 100% will....

-3
Dr0neRec0very -3 points ago +8 / -11

Ok, so, citing "women and kids" repeatedly isn't going pump your sales pitch; I'm not moved. Assault is assault. you clearly know what it is. You clearly know where your rights end and the law begins. The trick now, will be avoiding utter stupidity. If you KNOW exactly how long "We're going to remain peaceful", why ask the stupid fucking question? OF COURSE you're going to remain peaceful until your right to self defense is applicable. Any sooner, and you're just a pain in a patriot's ass.

4
JustTheNews 4 points ago +5 / -1

Wow...great you turned a basic question into the quest for the holy grail. Good job. You sure showed me internet stranger. lol

4
JustTheNews 4 points ago +4 / -0

the truth is since I am indeed barely into my 30s I am still tech considered a millenial....my attention span is short so once i got past the first retarded thing you said i quit reading and just assumed the rest. lol

-1
Dr0neRec0very -1 points ago +1 / -2

"Wow...great you turned a basic question into the quest for the holy grail." Hey, jackass, you either adhere to the Constitution, or you don't. If you're a vigilante, you ARE NOT adhering to the Constitution. At that point, you've entered a match against all of us who have sworn an oath to DEFEND that Constitution. You already know where your bounds are, but you posed the stupid question, anyway. You did it to encourage vigilantism, in direct defiance of our founders' intentions. Fuck you, sincerely.

1
Dashmoomoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Be wary of division. This is the goal of the enemy. While our words (and individual dictionary definitions) may conflict, the spirit of the TRUTH rings louder than any b.s. semantic argument. Don't fall in their [DS] trap! I just had this problem in a 9/11 thread. This is GOD vs satan. FYI; God wins.

My $0.02. Don't be a victim of the (Satanic, bi-tri-queer-communist-CIA-et al, ad nauseum) PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATION

-1
Dr0neRec0very -1 points ago +1 / -2

We either follow the law and the intentions laid out by the founders or we don't. Any idiot going off half-cocked, ABUSING the Second Amendment with vigilantism or other crimes, is a criminal mob and not a patriot. This isn't a 'satanic strategy'; it's just frustrated meat-heads fantasizing out-loud about breaking the law. Most of them will never do it. A few of them need to be discouraged. It's up to people like us to do the discouraging. Otherwise, fake news is going to get a whole bunch of good video of 'loan white male shooters' to rub in America's face.