3083
Comments (244)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
TRUMPTRAINTODC 3 points ago +3 / -0

Absolutely The World’s Top Epidemiologists all agree - Masks Don’t Work! | Zero Hedge https://www.zerohedge.com/political/worlds-top-epidemiologists-masks-dont-work But here’s what actually works https://media.thedonald.win/post/RiuhE8VK.jpeg All clinical studies and data supporting use of HCQ https://c19study.com/

2
SauronWasFramed 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cdc says so too

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/cdc-guidelines-say-wearing-a-mask-during-prolonged-exposure-to-coronavirus-wont-prevent-possible-infection

https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/php/public-health-recommendations.html

Data to inform the definition of close contact are limited. Factors to consider when defining close contact include proximity, the duration of exposure (e.g., longer exposure time likely increases exposure risk), and whether the exposure was to a person with symptoms (e.g., coughing likely increases exposure risk). While research indicates masks may help those who are infected from spreading the infection, there is less information regarding whether masks offer any protection for a contact exposed to a symptomatic or asymptomatic patient. Therefore, the determination of close contact should be made irrespective of whether the person with COVID-19 or the contact was wearing a mask. Because the general public has not received training on proper selection and use of respiratory PPE, it cannot be certain whether respiratory PPE worn during contact with an individual with COVID-19 infection protected them from exposure. Therefore, as a conservative approach, the determination of close contact should generally be made irrespective of whether the contact was wearing respiratory PPE, which is recommended for health care personnel and other trained users, or a mask recommended for the general public.