4929
Comments (229)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
Ronpaul2028 1 point ago +2 / -1

He can't. Why?

  1. The children and the family would likely not approve of being put in the spotlight this way. (Imagine the fake news headlines: "Trump abuses child to spread debunked conspiracy theory")

  2. Twitter already removes those videos as "child exploitation"

  3. Its hard to even find the videos now because most of them have been removed from YouTube, and Google search results suppress them. (Making people wanting to research the videos have nothing but fake news articles justifying them/calling it conspiracy theory)

  4. Cannot be put in ads either because of these reasons

So it just cannot be used due to tech censorship and the families involved, an too easy for press to spin it against Trump

3
JuicyfearsMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

So we'll excuse Joe Biden molesting children on camera because of Tech censorship? Fuck that mess. We all have to do our part in making this more well known to people. Trump's campaign should as well. This is an election making thing, potentially.

Says a lot about the logic of the left, a trap we need to avoid, that they will call us bringing attention to child molestation, sex trafficking and the like as the "child exploitation" when they're actively involved in those things every single day and it's their policy to normalize and fetishize it.

Those are families of US senators. It's public video. It should be public domain. This isn't a theory I'm saying to peddle like Chelsea not being Hillary's daughter. I would agree we shouldn't use children of politicians in those type of ways, but posting a public video? Come on. What is Joe doing behind the scenes with the camera off, if he's openly molesting them on video?