Granted the DNC sets the rules but Kamala received less than 1% support and dropped out before the first debate. Why would they choose her for the main candidate?
Probably because of her history with law enforcement and a strong pivot to a topic she can speak to. Regardless if shes right or not she maybe be able to build a platform on it. That + TDS
I understand the basis for the speculation, but I am deeply troubled by the idea that the Democrats can/will run a candidate that NOBODY has actually voted for.
Granted the DNC sets the rules but Kamala received less than 1% support and dropped out before the first debate. Why would they choose her for the main candidate?
Probably because of her history with law enforcement and a strong pivot to a topic she can speak to. Regardless if shes right or not she maybe be able to build a platform on it. That + TDS
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-election/kamala-harris-police-biden-vp-pick-california-senate-a9662801.html
Please be Hillary as vp. The humiliation would be through the roof
I understand the basis for the speculation, but I am deeply troubled by the idea that the Democrats can/will run a candidate that NOBODY has actually voted for.
Would someone explain how she would be Constitutionally eligible to be Potus? I don't think she's constitutionally eligible to be human.