5476
Comments (295)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
435
RedSocks157 435 points ago +436 / -1

Finally dealing with them how they should be dealt with. There would be no riots right now if cities had responded this way immediately 90 days ago!

But we all know that they actually wanted those riots.

179
MuadDon 179 points ago +182 / -3

Just like they want the lockdowns and unscientific mask compliance.

93
Shitposter69 93 points ago +96 / -3

But coverin muh face makes me feel better

140
RegularAmerican 140 points ago +154 / -14

What really infuriates me is all the people who know they don't work but wear them out of fear of being harassed.

Wow a 20% downvote ratio? I didn't know we had so many mask cucks on this site.

65
Shitposter69 65 points ago +66 / -1

When you live in a commie state like michigan, you get to look at all of the "no mask no service" signs. Fuck Whitmer. Thankfully the unlock Michigan petition train is racing by with no brakes.

31
Keeneix 31 points ago +31 / -0

I only wear a mask when I need to go into a grocery store. They will refuse me service unless I have a mask on. Half of the people there will wear them as chin guards. I hate the hypocrisy of those retards.

5
Nelsie 5 points ago +5 / -0

If you can smell it when someone farts through undies and jeans, you can imagine how well a mask holds in our breath. Some masks are made out of underwear material.

4
Patriot6969 4 points ago +4 / -0

The mask thing is horseshit but im not about to lose my job over it. If we're talking vaccines or anal probes or tracking, etc... thats a different story.

4
Pelayo 4 points ago +4 / -0

I just rectified the percentage a little by my 👍vote

5
America1stAndOnly 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, and bustin makes me feel good, but I can't just strap a proton nuclear accelerator onto my back and go around bustin whatever ghosts I feel like now can I?

1
krog 1 point ago +2 / -1

Masks are for unattractive people.

8
namechangearoo 8 points ago +8 / -0

And the sham impeachment.

6
trauncher 6 points ago +7 / -1

Exactly.... all of medicine has known that masks do NOTHING against virus... for the past 60+ years.

3
Flipbarryfromreddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Now there’s a mask complicance in Alexandria, Virginia too!

2
Daemoness 2 points ago +2 / -0

They actually thought forced masking and riots would HELP Biden at the polls ! That's how ridiculously out of touch they are

48
vinnychase 48 points ago +49 / -1

In oregon, an arsonist was caught red handed and was given a $250 bond...

8
Sticky 8 points ago +11 / -3

Fires can cross state lines how does this make any sense?

16
Rawnold_Reagan 16 points ago +16 / -0

I'm thinking they are pointing out the absurdity. Basically these state govs have to be complicit and are destroying us by giving a person who set fires in a very dry wildfire prone area and probably caused millions in damages and just basically letting them go.

10
MouthAgapeForBLMJizz 10 points ago +10 / -0

He’s pointing out the absurdity of a dude literally caught committing large scale arson only being arrested for like an hour and a $250 bond.

Another arson was arrested and released within hours then literally set SIX more fires the same day.

4
BallsackPaneer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Having already destroyed the argument that the police can protect you, BLM-ANTIFA now sets its sights on destroying its own bail reform movement agenda.

1
Sticky 1 point ago +1 / -0

I understand but I'm saying the same thing essentially. Shouldn't whomever is setting the bond be liable?

1
TruthyBrat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anarcho-tyranny

13
r_u_srs_srsly 13 points ago +14 / -1

dealing with them how they should be

propulsion of missiles onto a roadway

  1. what
  2. the
  3. fuck

high bail is not enough

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
9
Long_time_lurker 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yeah, but depending on what they throw, that can kill people, cause accidents, etc.

Given that we're dealing with people who use molotovs, I'm not willing to give them the benefits of any doubt right now.

12
zhalias 12 points ago +12 / -0

That reminds me of when I still fell for the MSM narratives, or rather one of the last ones I fell for. It was some "kids" arrested for "tossing rocks" at passing cars. The article made it seem like it was a bunch of 9 year olds throwing pebbles.

Then some independent journalist, don't remember which one, actually goes to the scene and takes a video showing the area, and the "small rocks" being thrown. Turns out, the group of "kids" were all 16 and 17, and the "pebbles" were the size of my head being thrown off an overpass as cars passed underneath it.

They ended up killing someone, and the MSM were basically trying to play it off like it was some horrible tragic accident and they shouldn't be punished for it, even though they did it on purpose and knew what could happen. That was one of the last narratives I fell for, or almost fell for since I ended up realizing what really went down.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
Patriot6969 1 point ago +1 / -0

propulsion of missles seems pretty specific. Im guessing fire works or shitty pipe bombs or something

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
GeoG85 3 points ago +3 / -0

What do you think the consequence will be to this?

They allow riots, allow people to die. And all those with relations to the dead, are just gonna, shut up and never speak of it again?

It's a shitstorm in the making if you ask me.