I'm thinking they are pointing out the absurdity. Basically these state govs have to be complicit and are destroying us by giving a person who set fires in a very dry wildfire prone area and probably caused millions in damages and just basically letting them go.
Having already destroyed the argument that the police can protect you, BLM-ANTIFA now sets its sights on destroying its own bail reform movement agenda.
In oregon, an arsonist was caught red handed and was given a $250 bond...
Fires can cross state lines how does this make any sense?
I'm thinking they are pointing out the absurdity. Basically these state govs have to be complicit and are destroying us by giving a person who set fires in a very dry wildfire prone area and probably caused millions in damages and just basically letting them go.
He’s pointing out the absurdity of a dude literally caught committing large scale arson only being arrested for like an hour and a $250 bond.
Another arson was arrested and released within hours then literally set SIX more fires the same day.
Having already destroyed the argument that the police can protect you, BLM-ANTIFA now sets its sights on destroying its own bail reform movement agenda.
I understand but I'm saying the same thing essentially. Shouldn't whomever is setting the bond be liable?
Anarcho-tyranny