Well, it depends on if liquer licenses are in the LA State constitution. Powers not explicitly given to the feds go to the states, and if the state constitutions don't explicitly give those powers to the state they are reserved by the people.
I would not disagree with that at all, however I commented before if one accept a license of any type, legally a license is a privilege, not a right. I got a JD License to “practice” law and then learned about the privilege & surrender the license which is not required.
Unconstitutional
It is constitutional, the bar owner applied and excepted the license (privilege) to sell liquor.
"Accepted."
Might want to use correct words otherwise you're opinion is easy to invalidate.
It's unconstitutional to require a license to sell anything, change my mind.
Oi, got a loicense for that freedom, guv'nor?
State's rights.
Take it up with your state government.
I suggest reminding them where rights come from
Well, it depends on if liquer licenses are in the LA State constitution. Powers not explicitly given to the feds go to the states, and if the state constitutions don't explicitly give those powers to the state they are reserved by the people.
Please show where that is stated in the US Constitution. Or in the Louisiana Constitution.
I would not disagree with that at all, however I commented before if one accept a license of any type, legally a license is a privilege, not a right. I got a JD License to “practice” law and then learned about the privilege & surrender the license which is not required.
Aren't you a good little bootlicker, you cum belching fuckwit.