I saw a post about using science as a way to control people unfortunately I thought I saved if but it appears I didn't. The main point of the post was that people could treat science like a religion and follow it blindly even though science is ever changing and should always be objected to and changed. Treating modern science as undeniably true is dangerous because much of it hasn't been tested super thoroughly. I mean to make a distinction between scientific facts we know like the existence of atoms or bacteria versus the uncertainty of the 'science' we hear on covid-19. We don't know if it'll become something like the common cold that we can't create a reliable vaccine for, among other things we don't know.
I saw a post about using science as a way to control people unfortunately I thought I saved if but it appears I didn't. The main point of the post was that people could treat science like a religion and follow it blindly even though science is ever changing and should always be objected to and changed. Treating modern science as undeniably true is dangerous because much of it hasn't been tested super thoroughly. I mean to make a distinction between scientific facts we know like the existence of atoms or bacteria versus the uncertainty of the 'science' we hear on covid-19. We don't know if it'll become something like the common cold that we can't create a reliable vaccine for, among other things we don't know.