Specifically, Neocons were originally formed by northeastern Jewish Democrats who became suddenly afraid of the antisemetic lurch of the Democrats in the post-WWII era. Right after the founding of Israel.
They have been obsessed with the Middle East and never gave up their lefty-leanings. They viewed joining conservatism as a matter of survival and not a conversion to conservative ideology.
If you were a poltard you might suggest that there was an ideological subversion of American conservatism by elite Neocons. We are slowly pushing them out it seems.
Which is odd, because neo-con idealism is more in line with neo-liberalism (and it's 1930s German socialist roots) than anything remotely conservative. They own their success in the Republican party by high-jacking patriotic nationalism and the military/foreign policy. I guess one can consider that a prerequisite for high-jacking domestic policy. The recent revelations of the Color Revolution outlined in the Revolver.news exposé can attest to that.
Specifically, Neocons were originally formed by northeastern Jewish Democrats who became suddenly afraid of the antisemetic lurch of the Democrats in the post-WWII era. Right after the founding of Israel.
They have been obsessed with the Middle East and never gave up their lefty-leanings. They viewed joining conservatism as a matter of survival and not a conversion to conservative ideology.
If you were a poltard you might suggest that there was an ideological subversion of American conservatism by elite Neocons. We are slowly pushing them out it seems.
Which is odd, because neo-con idealism is more in line with neo-liberalism (and it's 1930s German socialist roots) than anything remotely conservative. They own their success in the Republican party by high-jacking patriotic nationalism and the military/foreign policy. I guess one can consider that a prerequisite for high-jacking domestic policy. The recent revelations of the Color Revolution outlined in the Revolver.news exposé can attest to that.