2682
Comments (117)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
40
nowrongwrong 40 points ago +41 / -1

No, BLM is actually worse than the KKK.

On the whole, the KKK was content with the idea of segregation and separation. The vast majority of the violence they caused was directed at the people, both white and black, who were pushing for integration and desegregation in a culture and time that wasn't ready for it.

On the other hand, BLM want the entire white race genocided. They want whites utterly and completely gone, at which point they can turn their violence on the mixed race "traitors" and people of color who are too light and "white-passing".

8
ArchVileRespawned 8 points ago +10 / -2

There is no such things as a culture and time that is ready for integration and desegregation. It's only a matter of time before it turns out this way. It's inevitable.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
nowrongwrong 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think there are generational shifts.

To my grandparent's generation, rock and roll was pure evil in music form and you were going straight to hell for listening to it. To me, it's classic oldies.

To my parent's generation, heavy metal was pure evil in music form and you were going straight to hell if you listened to it. To me, it's high school nostalgia.

Then I look at the shit black rap artists are putting out now and wonder if my kids will ever feel that I'm out of touch for calling it pure evil in music form.

With regard to the South and segregation, I think over time the kids growing up would have forgotten the pain and horrors of the past. It's like that one 4chan racism post. I really believe that to be true. If BLM and the recent years of racial terrorism hadn't ruined everything we could have had a completely racially-blind culture within a couple more generations.

2
ArchVileRespawned 2 points ago +2 / -0

The hippies rebelled against their parents because their parents didn't want them to be STD-infested junkies with bastard children. Sometimes, the adults in the room are the ones who should be listened to.

I think over time the kids growing up would have forgotten the pain and horrors of the past. It's like that one 4chan racism post.

No, that sucker punch was planned from the beginning. They were just waiting until whites were weak enough and let our guards down. Average white IQ is 100, blacks 85. They're always going to be a resentful underclass in a white society, and unrest will always come from it.

0
nowrongwrong 0 points ago +1 / -1

The hippies rebelled against their parents because their parents didn't want them to be STD-infested junkies with bastard children. Sometimes, the adults in the room are the ones who should be listened to.

In a world before AIDS I don't think STDs were really considered a serious problem, and most hippies eventually got married even if one or two children were born out of wedlock.

Let's not overlook that the adults in the room had just endured two world wars so I don't think that was something the next generation wanted to emulate. It's a mixed bag.

They're always going to be a resentful underclass in a white society

Respectfully, I disagree. Historically I believe the underclass knew they had to pay their dues, take the shitty jobs nobody else wanted, and gradually earn their way up the pecking order. The Irish who first immigrated were treated worse than blacks by the other white races that happened to have settled a generation earlier.

The resentful part is a modern invention. In 2020 some dirt poor piece of shit from Somalia with absolutely no education or skills wins a lottery and gets imported into America and instead of being profoundly grateful, they demand benefits and more benefits and then want things changed to be more like shit-hole Somalia.