Philando Castile was by all accounts a good dude who didn't deserve to die. But they didn't riot for him. Maybe it was because it wouldn't have done well in the polls? 🤔🤔🤔
That guy who got killed holding an airsoft rifle in a Walmart was pretty fucked up. But the left couldn't use him because they hate toy guns as much as real ones, always protect the narrative.
Maybe it was because it wouldn't have done well in the polls
No. It's because if they pick "good" cases instead of bad ones, then everyone would come together, fix the problem, and they'd have nothing to divide the nation over.
It's why the riots/looting/intimidation HAD to happen after Floyd. Too many people expected protests, but his case (at the time) seemed clear enough to unify people and fix the issue. It was a genuine "oh Shit!" moment. They needed SOMETHING, ANYTHING about the case to create a wedge and piss off half the country. And that's why we got the riots across the country.
The problem is that when there's an innocent who tragically is wrongfully killed, there's no way to riot against an opposite side. I mean, they do, anyway. With those shitheads screaming "Say her name!" at Rand Paul, the very same Rand Paul who tried to end no-knock raids because of Breonna Taylor's death, the Rand Paul who had said her name a whole lot, in the context of "Breonna Taylor's death is awful, we need to do THIS CONCRETE THING here, today, and we can ensure it never happens again."
But when you're dealing with shitheads, don't be surprised when they act shitheaddedly.
That cuts out damn near every violent police interaction. The truth that they work so hard to hide is that cops don’t go pull innocent civilians from their homes or jobs to kill them (unless you are an innocent Trump supporter defending your home in a blue area).
The rationale is that if they know they're dealing with a violent criminal who is likely to get into a gun battle or take a hostage, you don't want to give them time to barricade themselves.
But in general I agree. There's gotta be a better way to handle it, like perhaps tailing the suspect and swarming them at the right time. But I bet that's more expensive.
A spoon is a tool and you leave that in a drawer in the kitchen where your kids can reach it.
A shotgun is a tool and you leave that in a locked safe or a mount out of reach of children.
No-knock raids are shotguns in the cutlery drawer right now. They're easily accessible on rubber-stamp warrants all across the country. Police departments often choose them based on convenience rather than actual need.
According to what data? Where do you see that they are predominantly chosen in situations that otherwise wouldn't warrant their use? Sounds like you're presuming that media highlights equate to frequency of actual occurrence.
Its almost tough to argue against these "saints of BLM" they need to have actually one person who is decent when looking into their past all you see is shit. The truth looks biased if it comes up snake eyes so often
Trayvon Martin was into drugs, violence
Michael Browns literally robbed a store before arrested then charged the officer and lying first hand witnesses
George Floyd. Porn Star. gun pointed at pregnant womans stomach. domestic abuse history etc.
Jacob Blake. Serial Rapist, violent history etc.
Breonna Taylor even was involved in Drugs Trading.
Kyle Rittenhouse attackers: pedos, burgulars and domestic abuse
Missing the Wendy's guy that grabbed the officer's taser. Eric Garner resisted arrest and was an obese fuck.
Philip Castellano and Daniel Shaver are the only one in recent memory that were 100% wrongfully killed and the Cop got off Scott-free. I got a black friend who's super conservative and he still made the case why the officers acted on a reasonable basis. I disagree, but it is arguable.
Ok so I can bring up Philando Castille as a wrongfully killed person and a name people might recongize. Otherwise every single media story was pretty much a hoax.
Honestly I needed one good person or else I looked biased because it hard to believe all these stories are hoaxes even it is true
Who can blame you for forgetting, there are so many...
Antwon Rose was just involved in a drive by shooting and had gunpowder residue on his hands as well as DNA on one of the guns in the car.
Rayshard Brooks was on probation for felonious child abuse charges when I punched a cop, stole a taser and fired it at an officer.
Alton Sterling had multiple violent offences on his record and was reaching for a gun.
Ricardo Munoz stabbed 4 people last year and had a knife in his hand as he ran towards the cops.
What was the name of the guy that Chicago police killed after he shot at them? The initial reports said he was just 17, it was a fake gun, and police killed him. But in reality he was in his early 20's, it was a real gun, he shot police first, and he was just injured.
I can certainly understand your attitude toward it. I’ll agree with an argument that it definitely doesn’t fall into an “all good things in moderation” group of activities like having a couple/three drinks vs finishing a bottle.
But I won’t automatically condemn someone for having fallen into the porn trap. If Jenna Jameson can inject some level of sanity into a world she’s closer to than you or me, good on her. Your mileage may vary, and that’s ok.
Yeah I mean respect for Jenna Jameson, but just because the porn industry empowered one famous Trump supporter I still dont think its a good industry.
We dont have enough data but I suspect that industry has led to nuclear family size even smaller sizes and smaller amounts of families. Men not wanting kids, happy to look at a computers screen, which have only been around 15 years, 4k around 5 years. People are too content without a family.
I find it disgusting & morally repugnant as well, but it's not illegal or criminal, so while Floyd engaged in criminal activity being in porn wasn't one of them
It's also an overstatement. Appearing as a stunt cock in one film, half-flaccid at that, is not a 'star'. Nobody saw it and went "yes, I'd like to watch other lurid material with this man in it, please."
How the Heroes of Black Lives Matter Executed Blacks
Humberto Fontova
|
Posted: Jul 04, 2020 12:01 AM
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Source: AP Photo
“We are thankful that he (Fidel Castro) provided a space where the traditional spiritual work of African people could flourish,” reads the eulogy from the U.S.-based Black Lives Matter for the top jailer and torturer of black political prisoners in the Western Hemisphere whose lifelong obsession was the destruction of the U.S. “As Fidel ascends to the realm of the ancestors, we summon his guidance, strength, and power as we recommit ourselves to the struggle for universal freedom. Fidel Vive!”
“You’re from South Carolina, good!” whooped an agent of Castro and Che Guevara’s July 26th Movement who in 1958 was signing up an American volunteer named Neil Macaulay (later a professor Emeritus) for the KGB-mentored terror group. “I really like your treatment of negroes up there in the American south!” gushed Castro and Che’s recruiter. “ Down here in Cuba all negroes are Batistianos (supporters of Fulgencio Batista, the black Cuban leader Castro, and Che overthrew) and marijuaneros,” (marijuana smokers, dope-fiends.)
“The first firing squad victim was a tall handsome mulatto,” a beaming Professor Neil Macaulay later wrote in his memoirs. “He stood blindfolded before the paredon (firing squad wall), his hands bound in front of him. “Muchachos,” he said calmly, “The only crime you are going to commit is to kill me, because I am innocent.”
“I stepped into the field,” continues the obviously proud Macaulay, “and shouted: “Ready!..Aim!–FIRE!”…the negro went down and I went up to him immediately, commanding the firing squad to order arms as I walked. There were bullet holes in his shirt and he seemed dead, but I wasted no time in putting the automatic to his head and pulled the trigger. It made a neat round hole.”
“Next to die was another negro who was hauled kicking and screaming to the paredon,” continues an obviously gloating Macauley in his memoirs. “I told the jailers to throw him up against the wall and get out of the way…the condemned negro froze in terror when he saw his executioners arrayed before him.
“READY!” My command jolted him out of his trance.
“NO!–NO!” he cried, and tried to climb the wall.
“NO!” he yelled while trying to hide behind one of the execution stakes, but the gun muzzles tracked him relentlessly.
“FIRE!” I yelled,” continues an obviously beaming Macaulay in his memoirs. “The negro turned his head and ducked just as the guns went off. Most of the bullets struck him in profile, tearing his nose, lips, chin and most of his cheeks. His face was transformed into a raw, red mass of flesh and bone that contrasted sharply to the smooth black skin bordering it. He lay on his back with what was left of his face turned to the firing squad. Anyone that hideously blasted, I thought, had to be dead…”Well,” I commented to the firing squad, “it is not necessary to give to give him the tiro de gracia.” (coup de grace)
“Yes, Americano!” shouted one of my men. “He still lives! Give him the shot!” His arms and legs were twitching. His movement ceased only when a bullet from my pistol entered his skull,” further gloats Macaulay.
The above comes from University of Florida Professor Emeritus Neill Macaulay’s memoirs titled,A Rebel in Cuba, published in 1970. The judicial process these black Cubans had undergone was best described by Fidel and Che themselves:
“Judicial evidence is an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution, We execute from revolutionary conviction.” (Che Guevara, Feb. 1959)
“Legal proof is impossible to obtain against war criminals. So we sentence them based on moral conviction.” (Fidel Castro Feb. 1959)
“The whole procedure was sickening,” wrote New York Times (no less!) correspondent, Ruby Hart Phillips, about a trial she attended in Havana in early 1959. “The defense attorney made absolutely no defense, instead he apologized to the court for defending the prisoner.”
Edwin Tetlow, a Havana correspondent for London’s Daily Telegraph, wrote about a “trial” by Che Guevara’s judicial dream – a team where he noticed the dozens of death sentences posted on a board – before the trial had started.
Future professor Emeritus Neil Macaulay who gleefully carried out these death sentences continues gloating in his memoirs:
“Escalona (a communist commander later notorious for exterminating rural Cuban rebels with Soviet arms and officers) introduced me to Fidel as “the man who is training the firing squads.” Fidel threw his head back and roared with laughter. As I stretched out my hand, he grabbed me by my shoulders and gave me a bear hug. Everybody was happy. At the University (of Havana) he was known as Greaseball. To me, however, he (Fidel) was very attractive.”
This attraction probably grew when Fidel Castro gifted Yankee executioner Neill Macaulay with property stolen from rightful Cuban owners under penalty of firing squad and torture chamber. More from professor Macaulay’s book:
“Fidel says to give the Americano what he wants. So I selected a plot of about sixty-five acres from an immense plantation that had been jointly owned by some friends of Batista. The INRA (Che Guevara’s Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agraria) gave me virtually unlimited credit…there was no house on my land so I chose as a residence the former country home of Pepe Fraga, Batista’s former chief of parking meters in Havana. Late in July my wife and infant son joined me there.”
Let's step back for a second and try to wrap our heads around these astounding crimes: An American mercenary joins Castro and Che Guevara’s KGB-mentored criminal band, executes (murders, actually) Cubans without trial, steals the property of Cubans at gunpoint. Then he serves for decades as Professor Emeritus of Latin American Studies at the University of Florida, apparently with nobody batting an eye!
The University of Florida is a state college, so there’s a good chance his salary was paid partly by his victims’ families. And again apparently nobody bats an eye!
Upon Macaulay’s death in 2007 (some suspect by suicide) leftist professor and documentarian Glenn Gebhard wrote: “He (Macaulay) was not a socialist or a communist, and he left (Cuba) after he realized he couldn’t make a living…He was a man of action and really smart.”
Does that somehow exonerate him? Che Guevara, whatever else we can say about him, seemed to actually believe in the communist holy book. Macaulay apparently murdered Cubans for fun and profit.
In the early 1960s, South Carolinian Neill Macaulay briefly lost his US citizenship for serving in a foreign nation’s military. Then “family friend” Strom Thurmond pulled some strings to get it back. In brief: a “good ‘ole southern boy” boasts of murdering “Negroes” as a mercenary. Then among the nation’s most prominent segregationists of the time (Strom Thurmond) retrieves his U.S. citizenship. Then a southern institute of higher learning hires and honors him!
And not one liberal peep in protest! Who but a gleeful servant (as murderer/lyncher) of Fidel Castro and Che Guevara could possibly get away with something like this in the eyes of the U.S. media and academia?
(Some of the Macaulay-type lynchings in Cuba were lovingly filmed (ISIS-style) by the heroes of Black Lives Matter. Warning, graphic!)
About the same time that Trayvon happened I was subscribed to r/badcopnodounght. It was a decent sub at the time documenting fucked up cops, unlike today where every thing a cop does is considered evil incarnate.
So there was this story bout a black guy that got into a car wreck and his car caught on fire, he escaped but had burns to around 70% of his body. Guy ends up sitting on the curb near his car and goes into shock. When the cops show up they tazed him repeatedly before throwing him to ground and cuffing him because he was mostly naked (stripped his burning cloths off) and unresponsive to commands (because he was in shock). I've tried to find the story and failed, but the truth of that particular story isn't important.
I was amazed that drugged out shitwad Trayvon was getting all this attention, while these other stories (there were many) that were far more outrageous were ignored. That's when I realized, it was not accidental. They intentionally pick the most fucked up people to use as martyrs.
They need the push back from us to show that we are racists. If they picked some one who was actually wronged, they know we would agree and it might cause real change to happen. For every Trayvon and Floyd, there are 10 or 20 blacks who were truly wronged, that are completely ignored by the MSM and BLM.
They don't want the problem fixed, they want to divide us. They need us at each others throats, not working together to fix a problem.
Yes, picking out wedges to divide us. That boils my rambling down to the base components. They know their adherents will blindly accept what ever shit they shovel down their throats, so just push the stories we won't accept to foment strife.
Okay, but think about this though. Imagine your only goal is destabilization and destruction of the country. Then would it be better to pick someone good or bad to become a martyr? I think bad is better. That way when the police actions are determined justified, you can feed the narrative and cause more rioting, destruction, and destabilization.
You realize the Zog-bots pick the most fuckt nogs to be martyrs. Its called race baiting. It radicalizes normal whites against them. Its not by accident...
To be fair, the left is attempting to change the meanings of these words.
Instead of “rapist”, it’s probably some bullshit like “uninvited sexual activity facilitator.” “Violent offender” becomes “poor black man who ain’t do nuffin’”
Next time someone tells you they hate cops, just ask them if they have a DUI, always a priceless reaction. I swear 90% of these people hate cops because they think they were some kind of victim for paying the fines and jail time for driving drunk.
The only systemic racism is affirmative action. Black people are not oppressed in the USA. The only racial injustice is the disproportionate unanswered amount of black on white crime.
This is a good meme, it will trigger a lefty into proving you wrong, they will go look at the criminal history of all these dindus and discover... holy shit they're all violent felons.
Because it's not about police brutality; not really. It's that a certain segment of society literally believes they should be able to violently assault anyone they get mad at and get away with it; SJW orthodoxy preaches that inflicting any consequences at all on this segment of society is racist, and that the appearance of racism under any circumstances is the single greatest sin possible.
You're missing the point. That's EXACTLY WHY they selected the people they did. For the specific purpose of creating a firestorm between races. People that support BLM will jump to his defense immediately due to the kneejerk programming they've been indoctrinated with, and people who see BLM for what it is will immediately call it as they see it (correctly). Unfortunately being correct about the ultimate facts of the situation doesn't have any effect whatsoever on the resolve of those who are already indoctrinated. So in effect the left (and various members of the UNIPARTY if were being honest) is using these obvious criminals for red meat to get both "sides" at each others throats, and it is devastatingly effective.
We truly need to craft an effective response, and reaction to this type of propaganda. As much as I agree that calling it as we see it and slapping people on the fence or in the middle with the indisputable facts in order to wake them up, is one of the first lines of attack, and possibly the most effective one at our disposal, we truly need to develop strategy that is geared towards diffusing the programming that so many who have been duped by the left are suffering under (whether they realize it or not).
As easy as it is to dismiss and even have disdain for some of these people, we need to remember that they are people, and they (many) are victims of brainwashing. Of course there are those who are completely beholden to the actual Marxist / communist / anarcho ideologies, and any conversion in these cases is likely a 0% chance, and those are not the ones I reference here.
Sorry for the wall of text but I've been thinking about the whole "why do they only defend those who are actually pieces of shit" scenario, and after some thought it really makes perfect sense. It's important to understand the why, in order to form the most effective means of combating this evil.
That's literally all they have though. If they had anyone to legitimately celebrate, they would. The demand for racism far exceeds the supply.
Philando Castile was by all accounts a good dude who didn't deserve to die. But they didn't riot for him. Maybe it was because it wouldn't have done well in the polls? 🤔🤔🤔
That guy who got killed holding an airsoft rifle in a Walmart was pretty fucked up. But the left couldn't use him because they hate toy guns as much as real ones, always protect the narrative.
The left loves guns... they just hate the idea of YOU having them.
When you finally find an effective martyr to further your racys narrative but it inconveniently conflicts with your disarm america narrative...
firstworldcommieproblems
To be fair we also have no idea what happened with Castille.
The dash cam shows literally nothing, and the witness only started filming after the shooting.
No. It's because if they pick "good" cases instead of bad ones, then everyone would come together, fix the problem, and they'd have nothing to divide the nation over.
It's why the riots/looting/intimidation HAD to happen after Floyd. Too many people expected protests, but his case (at the time) seemed clear enough to unify people and fix the issue. It was a genuine "oh Shit!" moment. They needed SOMETHING, ANYTHING about the case to create a wedge and piss off half the country. And that's why we got the riots across the country.
Damn good point.
The problem is that when there's an innocent who tragically is wrongfully killed, there's no way to riot against an opposite side. I mean, they do, anyway. With those shitheads screaming "Say her name!" at Rand Paul, the very same Rand Paul who tried to end no-knock raids because of Breonna Taylor's death, the Rand Paul who had said her name a whole lot, in the context of "Breonna Taylor's death is awful, we need to do THIS CONCRETE THING here, today, and we can ensure it never happens again."
But when you're dealing with shitheads, don't be surprised when they act shitheaddedly.
Yea, nonviolent offenders tend to listen to police orders and don't attempt to be violent towards them
His name was David Dorn!
That cuts out damn near every violent police interaction. The truth that they work so hard to hide is that cops don’t go pull innocent civilians from their homes or jobs to kill them (unless you are an innocent Trump supporter defending your home in a blue area).
The rationale is that if they know they're dealing with a violent criminal who is likely to get into a gun battle or take a hostage, you don't want to give them time to barricade themselves.
But in general I agree. There's gotta be a better way to handle it, like perhaps tailing the suspect and swarming them at the right time. But I bet that's more expensive.
Like anything else, they're a tool, and you don't throw away tools because they have the capacity to be used improperly.
A spoon is a tool and you leave that in a drawer in the kitchen where your kids can reach it.
A shotgun is a tool and you leave that in a locked safe or a mount out of reach of children.
No-knock raids are shotguns in the cutlery drawer right now. They're easily accessible on rubber-stamp warrants all across the country. Police departments often choose them based on convenience rather than actual need.
According to what data? Where do you see that they are predominantly chosen in situations that otherwise wouldn't warrant their use? Sounds like you're presuming that media highlights equate to frequency of actual occurrence.
According to the most common justification clause, preventing destruction of evidence rather than protecting the lives of innocents or even officers.
So you have no supporting evidence backing yourself up, got it.
The reason BLM has to heroicize filthy criminals is because regular citizens who follow instructions don't regularly get shot by the police
Its almost tough to argue against these "saints of BLM" they need to have actually one person who is decent when looking into their past all you see is shit. The truth looks biased if it comes up snake eyes so often
Im sure im forgetting some
Missing the Wendy's guy that grabbed the officer's taser. Eric Garner resisted arrest and was an obese fuck.
Philip Castellano and Daniel Shaver are the only one in recent memory that were 100% wrongfully killed and the Cop got off Scott-free. I got a black friend who's super conservative and he still made the case why the officers acted on a reasonable basis. I disagree, but it is arguable.
Ok so I can bring up Philando Castille as a wrongfully killed person and a name people might recongize. Otherwise every single media story was pretty much a hoax.
Honestly I needed one good person or else I looked biased because it hard to believe all these stories are hoaxes even it is true
Who can blame you for forgetting, there are so many...
Antwon Rose was just involved in a drive by shooting and had gunpowder residue on his hands as well as DNA on one of the guns in the car.
Rayshard Brooks was on probation for felonious child abuse charges when I punched a cop, stole a taser and fired it at an officer.
Alton Sterling had multiple violent offences on his record and was reaching for a gun.
Ricardo Munoz stabbed 4 people last year and had a knife in his hand as he ran towards the cops.
What was the name of the guy that Chicago police killed after he shot at them? The initial reports said he was just 17, it was a fake gun, and police killed him. But in reality he was in his early 20's, it was a real gun, he shot police first, and he was just injured.
Porn Star is not disqualifying. Jenna Jameson is doing heavy lifting against the hollyweird pedo industry.
For me it kinda is. Our Bodys are sacred. Go against the grain of this common affliction
I can certainly understand your attitude toward it. I’ll agree with an argument that it definitely doesn’t fall into an “all good things in moderation” group of activities like having a couple/three drinks vs finishing a bottle.
But I won’t automatically condemn someone for having fallen into the porn trap. If Jenna Jameson can inject some level of sanity into a world she’s closer to than you or me, good on her. Your mileage may vary, and that’s ok.
Yeah I mean respect for Jenna Jameson, but just because the porn industry empowered one famous Trump supporter I still dont think its a good industry.
We dont have enough data but I suspect that industry has led to nuclear family size even smaller sizes and smaller amounts of families. Men not wanting kids, happy to look at a computers screen, which have only been around 15 years, 4k around 5 years. People are too content without a family.
Im guilty of this myself some days too.
We aren’t that far apart brother. Peace 👍🏼
I think other factors have had a far bigger factor in deterring men. Porn has just made it a more comfortable place to be.
Family law.
I find it disgusting & morally repugnant as well, but it's not illegal or criminal, so while Floyd engaged in criminal activity being in porn wasn't one of them
It's also an overstatement. Appearing as a stunt cock in one film, half-flaccid at that, is not a 'star'. Nobody saw it and went "yes, I'd like to watch other lurid material with this man in it, please."
My guess would have been prison or hell.
Omg this is soooo fucking spicy!
Just pick from the police blotter.
Can’t use images anymore since many places have banned mugshots.
Shoutout to my brown euro ‘asians’
A little long, but y'all will appreciate this:
How the Heroes of Black Lives Matter Executed Blacks
Humberto Fontova | Posted: Jul 04, 2020 12:01 AM The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Source: AP Photo
“We are thankful that he (Fidel Castro) provided a space where the traditional spiritual work of African people could flourish,” reads the eulogy from the U.S.-based Black Lives Matter for the top jailer and torturer of black political prisoners in the Western Hemisphere whose lifelong obsession was the destruction of the U.S. “As Fidel ascends to the realm of the ancestors, we summon his guidance, strength, and power as we recommit ourselves to the struggle for universal freedom. Fidel Vive!”
“You’re from South Carolina, good!” whooped an agent of Castro and Che Guevara’s July 26th Movement who in 1958 was signing up an American volunteer named Neil Macaulay (later a professor Emeritus) for the KGB-mentored terror group. “I really like your treatment of negroes up there in the American south!” gushed Castro and Che’s recruiter. “ Down here in Cuba all negroes are Batistianos (supporters of Fulgencio Batista, the black Cuban leader Castro, and Che overthrew) and marijuaneros,” (marijuana smokers, dope-fiends.)
“The first firing squad victim was a tall handsome mulatto,” a beaming Professor Neil Macaulay later wrote in his memoirs. “He stood blindfolded before the paredon (firing squad wall), his hands bound in front of him. “Muchachos,” he said calmly, “The only crime you are going to commit is to kill me, because I am innocent.”
“I stepped into the field,” continues the obviously proud Macaulay, “and shouted: “Ready!..Aim!–FIRE!”…the negro went down and I went up to him immediately, commanding the firing squad to order arms as I walked. There were bullet holes in his shirt and he seemed dead, but I wasted no time in putting the automatic to his head and pulled the trigger. It made a neat round hole.”
“Next to die was another negro who was hauled kicking and screaming to the paredon,” continues an obviously gloating Macauley in his memoirs. “I told the jailers to throw him up against the wall and get out of the way…the condemned negro froze in terror when he saw his executioners arrayed before him.
“READY!” My command jolted him out of his trance. “NO!–NO!” he cried, and tried to climb the wall. “NO!” he yelled while trying to hide behind one of the execution stakes, but the gun muzzles tracked him relentlessly.
“FIRE!” I yelled,” continues an obviously beaming Macaulay in his memoirs. “The negro turned his head and ducked just as the guns went off. Most of the bullets struck him in profile, tearing his nose, lips, chin and most of his cheeks. His face was transformed into a raw, red mass of flesh and bone that contrasted sharply to the smooth black skin bordering it. He lay on his back with what was left of his face turned to the firing squad. Anyone that hideously blasted, I thought, had to be dead…”Well,” I commented to the firing squad, “it is not necessary to give to give him the tiro de gracia.” (coup de grace) “Yes, Americano!” shouted one of my men. “He still lives! Give him the shot!” His arms and legs were twitching. His movement ceased only when a bullet from my pistol entered his skull,” further gloats Macaulay.
The above comes from University of Florida Professor Emeritus Neill Macaulay’s memoirs titled,A Rebel in Cuba, published in 1970. The judicial process these black Cubans had undergone was best described by Fidel and Che themselves: “Judicial evidence is an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution, We execute from revolutionary conviction.” (Che Guevara, Feb. 1959)
“Legal proof is impossible to obtain against war criminals. So we sentence them based on moral conviction.” (Fidel Castro Feb. 1959)
“The whole procedure was sickening,” wrote New York Times (no less!) correspondent, Ruby Hart Phillips, about a trial she attended in Havana in early 1959. “The defense attorney made absolutely no defense, instead he apologized to the court for defending the prisoner.”
Edwin Tetlow, a Havana correspondent for London’s Daily Telegraph, wrote about a “trial” by Che Guevara’s judicial dream – a team where he noticed the dozens of death sentences posted on a board – before the trial had started.
Future professor Emeritus Neil Macaulay who gleefully carried out these death sentences continues gloating in his memoirs:
“Escalona (a communist commander later notorious for exterminating rural Cuban rebels with Soviet arms and officers) introduced me to Fidel as “the man who is training the firing squads.” Fidel threw his head back and roared with laughter. As I stretched out my hand, he grabbed me by my shoulders and gave me a bear hug. Everybody was happy. At the University (of Havana) he was known as Greaseball. To me, however, he (Fidel) was very attractive.”
This attraction probably grew when Fidel Castro gifted Yankee executioner Neill Macaulay with property stolen from rightful Cuban owners under penalty of firing squad and torture chamber. More from professor Macaulay’s book:
“Fidel says to give the Americano what he wants. So I selected a plot of about sixty-five acres from an immense plantation that had been jointly owned by some friends of Batista. The INRA (Che Guevara’s Instituto Nacional de Reforma Agraria) gave me virtually unlimited credit…there was no house on my land so I chose as a residence the former country home of Pepe Fraga, Batista’s former chief of parking meters in Havana. Late in July my wife and infant son joined me there.”
Let's step back for a second and try to wrap our heads around these astounding crimes: An American mercenary joins Castro and Che Guevara’s KGB-mentored criminal band, executes (murders, actually) Cubans without trial, steals the property of Cubans at gunpoint. Then he serves for decades as Professor Emeritus of Latin American Studies at the University of Florida, apparently with nobody batting an eye!
The University of Florida is a state college, so there’s a good chance his salary was paid partly by his victims’ families. And again apparently nobody bats an eye! Upon Macaulay’s death in 2007 (some suspect by suicide) leftist professor and documentarian Glenn Gebhard wrote: “He (Macaulay) was not a socialist or a communist, and he left (Cuba) after he realized he couldn’t make a living…He was a man of action and really smart.”
Does that somehow exonerate him? Che Guevara, whatever else we can say about him, seemed to actually believe in the communist holy book. Macaulay apparently murdered Cubans for fun and profit.
In the early 1960s, South Carolinian Neill Macaulay briefly lost his US citizenship for serving in a foreign nation’s military. Then “family friend” Strom Thurmond pulled some strings to get it back. In brief: a “good ‘ole southern boy” boasts of murdering “Negroes” as a mercenary. Then among the nation’s most prominent segregationists of the time (Strom Thurmond) retrieves his U.S. citizenship. Then a southern institute of higher learning hires and honors him!
And not one liberal peep in protest! Who but a gleeful servant (as murderer/lyncher) of Fidel Castro and Che Guevara could possibly get away with something like this in the eyes of the U.S. media and academia?
(Some of the Macaulay-type lynchings in Cuba were lovingly filmed (ISIS-style) by the heroes of Black Lives Matter. Warning, graphic!)
Great meme, but I have to shit all over it.
About the same time that Trayvon happened I was subscribed to r/badcopnodounght. It was a decent sub at the time documenting fucked up cops, unlike today where every thing a cop does is considered evil incarnate.
So there was this story bout a black guy that got into a car wreck and his car caught on fire, he escaped but had burns to around 70% of his body. Guy ends up sitting on the curb near his car and goes into shock. When the cops show up they tazed him repeatedly before throwing him to ground and cuffing him because he was mostly naked (stripped his burning cloths off) and unresponsive to commands (because he was in shock). I've tried to find the story and failed, but the truth of that particular story isn't important.
I was amazed that drugged out shitwad Trayvon was getting all this attention, while these other stories (there were many) that were far more outrageous were ignored. That's when I realized, it was not accidental. They intentionally pick the most fucked up people to use as martyrs.
They need the push back from us to show that we are racists. If they picked some one who was actually wronged, they know we would agree and it might cause real change to happen. For every Trayvon and Floyd, there are 10 or 20 blacks who were truly wronged, that are completely ignored by the MSM and BLM.
They don't want the problem fixed, they want to divide us. They need us at each others throats, not working together to fix a problem.
Very good comment and very true. Communist shit bags at blm and Antifa pick the worst examples to drive wedges.
Yes, picking out wedges to divide us. That boils my rambling down to the base components. They know their adherents will blindly accept what ever shit they shovel down their throats, so just push the stories we won't accept to foment strife.
Sheeeit, readins is rayciss, Fredo!
Okay, but think about this though. Imagine your only goal is destabilization and destruction of the country. Then would it be better to pick someone good or bad to become a martyr? I think bad is better. That way when the police actions are determined justified, you can feed the narrative and cause more rioting, destruction, and destabilization.
Yes. Gaslighting in general. Drive your victim insane while claiming victimhood yourself.
Shoutout to Jacob Blake for singlehandedly ending MeToo.
You realize the Zog-bots pick the most fuckt nogs to be martyrs. Its called race baiting. It radicalizes normal whites against them. Its not by accident...
You got me. Involuntary belly laugh.
To be fair, the left is attempting to change the meanings of these words.
Instead of “rapist”, it’s probably some bullshit like “uninvited sexual activity facilitator.” “Violent offender” becomes “poor black man who ain’t do nuffin’”
Here to say this made me lol, thanks fren
blackmail & leverage
Next time someone tells you they hate cops, just ask them if they have a DUI, always a priceless reaction. I swear 90% of these people hate cops because they think they were some kind of victim for paying the fines and jail time for driving drunk.
High spice! Muy picante!
Worse still is having a media who won't even investigate this shit.
"Damn, I'm glad I pretend I can't read!"
“Let me axe you”
Shut up. Fentanyl Floyd died of an OD
kek
They don't care about the poor black kid who is trying to study and elevate himself.
No, they defend the violent psychopaths.
You can't make this shit up.
The stickied posts are on fire right now!
That's a spicy meatball!
Question, why would this guy have picked the book up in the first place if he couldn’t read?
I'm ded. Great way to end the night.
This subverted my expectations! Kek!
Ouch! Too spicy!
75% of black California boys are functionally illiterate.
Also, this!
You can tell that quiet student has had enough of that shit.
We all have.
That leaves the simple question
How does Dindu know what the book is about ?
:)
Don't care, still share
All I know for sure is that joggers ruin everything.
No problem was ever solved by adding more joggers to it.
Accurate
I’m glad we brought this meme back 😂 holy shit I love it
Antifa and BLM's new chant should be "Power to the Pedos!"
Ow ow ow this one is hot!
Colorized.
Asked: Where where you last week when they killed a white boy?
Response
Black Lives Matter.
/pol/ tier keks
Well done....
The only systemic racism is affirmative action. Black people are not oppressed in the USA. The only racial injustice is the disproportionate unanswered amount of black on white crime.
This is a good meme, it will trigger a lefty into proving you wrong, they will go look at the criminal history of all these dindus and discover... holy shit they're all violent felons.
Because it's not about police brutality; not really. It's that a certain segment of society literally believes they should be able to violently assault anyone they get mad at and get away with it; SJW orthodoxy preaches that inflicting any consequences at all on this segment of society is racist, and that the appearance of racism under any circumstances is the single greatest sin possible.
You're missing the point. That's EXACTLY WHY they selected the people they did. For the specific purpose of creating a firestorm between races. People that support BLM will jump to his defense immediately due to the kneejerk programming they've been indoctrinated with, and people who see BLM for what it is will immediately call it as they see it (correctly). Unfortunately being correct about the ultimate facts of the situation doesn't have any effect whatsoever on the resolve of those who are already indoctrinated. So in effect the left (and various members of the UNIPARTY if were being honest) is using these obvious criminals for red meat to get both "sides" at each others throats, and it is devastatingly effective.
We truly need to craft an effective response, and reaction to this type of propaganda. As much as I agree that calling it as we see it and slapping people on the fence or in the middle with the indisputable facts in order to wake them up, is one of the first lines of attack, and possibly the most effective one at our disposal, we truly need to develop strategy that is geared towards diffusing the programming that so many who have been duped by the left are suffering under (whether they realize it or not).
As easy as it is to dismiss and even have disdain for some of these people, we need to remember that they are people, and they (many) are victims of brainwashing. Of course there are those who are completely beholden to the actual Marxist / communist / anarcho ideologies, and any conversion in these cases is likely a 0% chance, and those are not the ones I reference here.
Sorry for the wall of text but I've been thinking about the whole "why do they only defend those who are actually pieces of shit" scenario, and after some thought it really makes perfect sense. It's important to understand the why, in order to form the most effective means of combating this evil.