Now. I am a mechanic by trade. I think that qualifies me to point out chainsaws use a gasoline oil mixture to run (sarcasm). There is a chainsaw present in the picture. There are no gas stations nearby in the forest. Its pretty typical for forest services to backpack gasoline into the wilderness when operating chainsaws. While it could be used to fuel a fire this isnt proof of anything. You dont need gasoline to start a raging brush fire.
No. I agree. But this doesn't prove anything and just becomes a strawman for people to say "see baseless claims of antifa arson! They're helping stop wildfires you hillbilly!"
I believe there are arsonists lighting fires. I think its likely that it's leftist activists. But this picture does nothing to backup the claim that antifa is involved. It's possible there are antifa sympathizing firefighters (their gear is all legit... kinda expensive and would take a lot of research to come up with as a disguise). Its POSSIBLE these guys did light fires. But again this photo isn't going to convince anyone on the fence.
I think its better to redpill people just on the actual proven cases of arson alone. Let them come to their own conclusions.
I’ll agree with you on your statement as well. There is no way to prove anything by looking at this unless they were actually lighting a fire and it was caught in this pic. Carry on, Pede.
Anon claims to be a “mechanic by trade” and then attempts to qualify that claim by pointing out the fuel-oil mixture requirement of two-stroke chainsaws, as if you you need to be a “mechanic by trade” to understand that, then connects the appearance of the gas can to the chainsaw (as if it takes a “mechanic by trade” to realize this, even though other anons would most likely connect the two even if they didn’t understand the oil requirement), then claims without proof that “there are no gas stations in the forest” [presumably near the site where picture was taken] which isn’t necessary true as any pede from CA knows, then imparts forestry knowledge without proof, then states the obvious (with authority!), then clams pic is proof of nothing while completely ignoring an entire body of evidence that proves BLM/Klantifags are domestic terrorists who give zero fucks about responsible forestry and instead are inclined to burn, loot, and murder in the name of fascism.
I literally said I believe its arson. I think its likely a lot of it is leftists. This picture proves nothing though other than some people looking like firefighters have a antifa flag. Everything else is conjecture. Seriously chill out you sound like some woke leftist with their "russian bot" response. Btw I was being sarcastic about "qualification". Because any person presented with this as evidence would say the same thing about the gas being for the chainsaw.
Look at my post history Sherlock. I made a post about an actual BLM associate being arrested for arson. Pretty terrible shill huh?
Look at my post history Sherlock. I made a post about an actual BLM associate being arrested for arson. Pretty terrible shill huh?
Astroturfing shills like you have to make a lot of legit but irrelevant posts (that are often short and cliché because you people are very low IQ) to build repertoire so that when you’re finally noticed you can point to your post history and say “see I’m one of you and def not a shill!”
Now. I am a mechanic by trade. I think that qualifies me to point out chainsaws use a gasoline oil mixture to run (sarcasm). There is a chainsaw present in the picture. There are no gas stations nearby in the forest. Its pretty typical for forest services to backpack gasoline into the wilderness when operating chainsaws. While it could be used to fuel a fire this isnt proof of anything. You dont need gasoline to start a raging brush fire.
But, Antifa flags are not standard issue for firefighters.
No. I agree. But this doesn't prove anything and just becomes a strawman for people to say "see baseless claims of antifa arson! They're helping stop wildfires you hillbilly!"
I believe there are arsonists lighting fires. I think its likely that it's leftist activists. But this picture does nothing to backup the claim that antifa is involved. It's possible there are antifa sympathizing firefighters (their gear is all legit... kinda expensive and would take a lot of research to come up with as a disguise). Its POSSIBLE these guys did light fires. But again this photo isn't going to convince anyone on the fence.
I think its better to redpill people just on the actual proven cases of arson alone. Let them come to their own conclusions.
I’ll agree with you on your statement as well. There is no way to prove anything by looking at this unless they were actually lighting a fire and it was caught in this pic. Carry on, Pede.
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/09/western_wildfires_are_due_to_arson_and_stupidity_not_climate_change.html
Anon claims to be a “mechanic by trade” and then attempts to qualify that claim by pointing out the fuel-oil mixture requirement of two-stroke chainsaws, as if you you need to be a “mechanic by trade” to understand that, then connects the appearance of the gas can to the chainsaw (as if it takes a “mechanic by trade” to realize this, even though other anons would most likely connect the two even if they didn’t understand the oil requirement), then claims without proof that “there are no gas stations in the forest” [presumably near the site where picture was taken] which isn’t necessary true as any pede from CA knows, then imparts forestry knowledge without proof, then states the obvious (with authority!), then clams pic is proof of nothing while completely ignoring an entire body of evidence that proves BLM/Klantifags are domestic terrorists who give zero fucks about responsible forestry and instead are inclined to burn, loot, and murder in the name of fascism.
Found the shill.
Also:
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2020/09/western_wildfires_are_due_to_arson_and_stupidity_not_climate_change.html
I literally said I believe its arson. I think its likely a lot of it is leftists. This picture proves nothing though other than some people looking like firefighters have a antifa flag. Everything else is conjecture. Seriously chill out you sound like some woke leftist with their "russian bot" response. Btw I was being sarcastic about "qualification". Because any person presented with this as evidence would say the same thing about the gas being for the chainsaw.
Look at my post history Sherlock. I made a post about an actual BLM associate being arrested for arson. Pretty terrible shill huh?
Lol no, you did not. [gaslighting, no pun intended]
Backpedaling. [more gaslighting]
Yet more gaslighting. [pun intended]
Conjecture.
Gaslighting. [yawn]
Gaslighting. [nodding off]
Minimization: ignoring massive pile of evidence of BLM/Klantifa terrorist activities
Astroturfing shills like you have to make a lot of legit but irrelevant posts (that are often short and cliché because you people are very low IQ) to build repertoire so that when you’re finally noticed you can point to your post history and say “see I’m one of you and def not a shill!”
Shill confirmed lmao