Then we become space colonizers and the progressives make up a minority of moonmen that we can oppress. Then they ban the term moonmen because it's patriarchal.
Have a vote up 'cus it's good to ask such questions.
First vid: Ice fell off the turbopump assembly, which gets frosted up during the prestart chilldown sequence in the atmosphere because of the liquid oxygen. Parts of it warm up after the engine starts the LOX impeller sections will remain very cold. When this piece falls, it lands on the skirt coolant duct which carries ballpark 800K gas generator exhaust, and is therefore hot enough to cause the LeidenfrostEffect. To recreate the effect on a stovetop, first make sure you have at least one ice cube. Get a very clean cast iron skillet or stainless steel saucepan (the latter works better), and crank the stove up to max and give about ten minutes to warm up the pan (maybe longer for a cast iron skillet; turn off the heat if you see or smell smoke to prevent damage to the seasoning - if it doesn't work, there was crud on the element or pot support frame.) Drop the ice cube into the sauce pan and watch it float around like a little hovercraft on the cushion of steam.
Second vid: I never saw anything leave his hand, so I don't think he dropped anything at all. It looks like he thinks he dropped something and reflexively looks "down" because astronauts do act like there's gravity in space. In the last minutes of her life, Kalpana "Kacey" Chawla put something down and it floated away towards Willie McCool; she admits the error with "Sorry, I was acting one gee." (This was in the recovered cabin video of STS-107.)
Have a vote up 'cus it's good to ask such questions.
I like this attitude. We should naturally question things, especially when the PTB are involved. However, there needs to be a point where critical thinking needs to be applied.
Case in point: The 'mouse'. Not only does it move exactly like the ice you describe, and completely unlike a mouse, but on the scale of the rocket that 'mouse' would have to be ~10 times larger than any mouse I have ever seen. Yet, because it is a white blob it is declared to be a mouse, with absolutely no critical thought or analysis.
And looking further down this comment chain it seems the guy you are replying to is a lost cause: Denial, illogical, ad hominem attack when coolly presented with evidence.
It actually surprised NASA and Aerojet engineers how much ice the SSMEs had to shed when they first flew the Shuttle. Rocket engines have a "Prandtl-Meyer" limit beyond which no rocket exhaust can go further forward in a vacuum, however, the boundary layer, maybe a millimeter above the surface of the rocket nozzle, remains subsonic, and actually pretty cold because the SSME wall is cooled by liquid hydrogen in the -259C ballpark and with roughly triple the specific and latent heats of water by mass. Enough of this mostly-water exhaust would recirculate up the cold side of the nozzle on the outside to freeze to it, and also, the residual exhaust venting after MECO would freeze to the hot wall. Then these would come off in great chunks, and the astronauts scrambled for their cameras. Some of these pieces were astonishingly large (a square foot or more) and worried engineers that they might ding up the entry protection tiles. John Glenn's famous fireflies were ice crystals from the Mercury spacecraft's hydrogen peroxide thrusters freezing against the spacecraft skin while it was in Earth's shadow. A bunch of them float off during the shadow passage, and Scott Carpenter was able to knock some off his Mercury spacecraft during orbital morning by whacking the hull with a flashlight (and getting almost catastrophically behind in his spacecraft activities schedule in the process.)
This is the right attitude as well. The thing that frustrates me the most about Climate Change is that very few people actually look at it with a scientific mind. Science means questioning. Are we changing the climate? Yes, I’m some way. How long have we been doing this? For 1000s of years. Is the climate static absent our interference? No the climate changes over time and goes through natural cycles. How much change are we actually effecting? Debatable and inconclusive. Is the only way to negate possible damage to stop our use of fossil fuels? It’s not even the best way, technology can help us to filter pollution and Geo-Engineer on a scale not imagined by most people to bring our climate and weather under our control. And if we want to colonize other worlds, it’s tech we’ll need ready to go. When people tell me they “believe science” I question their intelligence, science must be kept honest by constant questioning and reaffirming principles. When something has been reaffirmed so many times as to be considered infallible, only then can you call it a Law instead of a Theory.
So two points, and the first, simpler, you really should take to heart is that the second source mirrors the first, so it is just one source. (I also mistrust the BBC to an extent that I did not even click on your link to them; the only outlet for which I have a lower opinion is the Daily Beast. Maybe The Young Turks, but nobody ever cites them in my presence.)
The second is that I can't see what you're referring to at all. I can't get it in higher than 360p/30fps, and I did watch this thing live and it was going out at 720p https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX4kpM6Upfc&t=29m30s.
Even if it is there, what does a "Space Bug" actually prove? That spacecraft shed debris? You've made the claim that NASA has "bullshit Moon Landing videos" ...can you actually support that claim?
So, there is this Yuri Bezmenov guy who warns us of exactly the kind of "journalist" we now have all over the media right now, which make defamatory, mendacious, and even scurrilous lies about President Trump literally every day. Yuri Bezmenov was a Soviet. Find me even one claim from a Soviet Union official that the Apollo landings were fake. If anyone is going to lie about the moon landings, it will be them. Likewise if anyone is going to affirm the truth, if it is so, that the moon landings were fake, it is going to be them. Yet not once did the Soviet Union dispute the reality of the lunar landings, why is that? It is because it is so ridiculous to claim the lunar landings were fake that not even the unscrupulous communists of the Soviet Union were going to do so?
The second link proves nothing. The third link I wont watch bc I saw his flatearth doc and it was riddled with inaccuracies. I will check out the first link when I have time.
Probanbly because the interviewers came off as a bit assholish.
I saw the press conference apollo 11 gave after returning and it was much more strange than these interactions. The vid you linked (or at least the first few mins I watched) only proves old men get angry when their legacy is threatened.
YES! Pedes you are so "in" within the elections right now (understandably) that I fear sometimes you may overlook the positive effects that Trump's admin has had (and another term will increase) on the whole free world. America is the last bastion for freedom and prosperity. It is she who holds the lantern high to light the way.
As the moon cries BIGOT!
Then we become space colonizers and the progressives make up a minority of moonmen that we can oppress. Then they ban the term moonmen because it's patriarchal.
Moonmen. Look at the fucking bigot right here!
Have a vote up 'cus it's good to ask such questions.
First vid: Ice fell off the turbopump assembly, which gets frosted up during the prestart chilldown sequence in the atmosphere because of the liquid oxygen. Parts of it warm up after the engine starts the LOX impeller sections will remain very cold. When this piece falls, it lands on the skirt coolant duct which carries ballpark 800K gas generator exhaust, and is therefore hot enough to cause the Leidenfrost Effect. To recreate the effect on a stovetop, first make sure you have at least one ice cube. Get a very clean cast iron skillet or stainless steel saucepan (the latter works better), and crank the stove up to max and give about ten minutes to warm up the pan (maybe longer for a cast iron skillet; turn off the heat if you see or smell smoke to prevent damage to the seasoning - if it doesn't work, there was crud on the element or pot support frame.) Drop the ice cube into the sauce pan and watch it float around like a little hovercraft on the cushion of steam.
Second vid: I never saw anything leave his hand, so I don't think he dropped anything at all. It looks like he thinks he dropped something and reflexively looks "down" because astronauts do act like there's gravity in space. In the last minutes of her life, Kalpana "Kacey" Chawla put something down and it floated away towards Willie McCool; she admits the error with "Sorry, I was acting one gee." (This was in the recovered cabin video of STS-107.)
I like this attitude. We should naturally question things, especially when the PTB are involved. However, there needs to be a point where critical thinking needs to be applied.
Case in point: The 'mouse'. Not only does it move exactly like the ice you describe, and completely unlike a mouse, but on the scale of the rocket that 'mouse' would have to be ~10 times larger than any mouse I have ever seen. Yet, because it is a white blob it is declared to be a mouse, with absolutely no critical thought or analysis.
And looking further down this comment chain it seems the guy you are replying to is a lost cause: Denial, illogical, ad hominem attack when coolly presented with evidence.
It actually surprised NASA and Aerojet engineers how much ice the SSMEs had to shed when they first flew the Shuttle. Rocket engines have a "Prandtl-Meyer" limit beyond which no rocket exhaust can go further forward in a vacuum, however, the boundary layer, maybe a millimeter above the surface of the rocket nozzle, remains subsonic, and actually pretty cold because the SSME wall is cooled by liquid hydrogen in the -259C ballpark and with roughly triple the specific and latent heats of water by mass. Enough of this mostly-water exhaust would recirculate up the cold side of the nozzle on the outside to freeze to it, and also, the residual exhaust venting after MECO would freeze to the hot wall. Then these would come off in great chunks, and the astronauts scrambled for their cameras. Some of these pieces were astonishingly large (a square foot or more) and worried engineers that they might ding up the entry protection tiles. John Glenn's famous fireflies were ice crystals from the Mercury spacecraft's hydrogen peroxide thrusters freezing against the spacecraft skin while it was in Earth's shadow. A bunch of them float off during the shadow passage, and Scott Carpenter was able to knock some off his Mercury spacecraft during orbital morning by whacking the hull with a flashlight (and getting almost catastrophically behind in his spacecraft activities schedule in the process.)
This is the right attitude as well. The thing that frustrates me the most about Climate Change is that very few people actually look at it with a scientific mind. Science means questioning. Are we changing the climate? Yes, I’m some way. How long have we been doing this? For 1000s of years. Is the climate static absent our interference? No the climate changes over time and goes through natural cycles. How much change are we actually effecting? Debatable and inconclusive. Is the only way to negate possible damage to stop our use of fossil fuels? It’s not even the best way, technology can help us to filter pollution and Geo-Engineer on a scale not imagined by most people to bring our climate and weather under our control. And if we want to colonize other worlds, it’s tech we’ll need ready to go. When people tell me they “believe science” I question their intelligence, science must be kept honest by constant questioning and reaffirming principles. When something has been reaffirmed so many times as to be considered infallible, only then can you call it a Law instead of a Theory.
So two points, and the first, simpler, you really should take to heart is that the second source mirrors the first, so it is just one source. (I also mistrust the BBC to an extent that I did not even click on your link to them; the only outlet for which I have a lower opinion is the Daily Beast. Maybe The Young Turks, but nobody ever cites them in my presence.)
The second is that I can't see what you're referring to at all. I can't get it in higher than 360p/30fps, and I did watch this thing live and it was going out at 720p https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fX4kpM6Upfc&t=29m30s.
Even if it is there, what does a "Space Bug" actually prove? That spacecraft shed debris? You've made the claim that NASA has "bullshit Moon Landing videos" ...can you actually support that claim?
So, there is this Yuri Bezmenov guy who warns us of exactly the kind of "journalist" we now have all over the media right now, which make defamatory, mendacious, and even scurrilous lies about President Trump literally every day. Yuri Bezmenov was a Soviet. Find me even one claim from a Soviet Union official that the Apollo landings were fake. If anyone is going to lie about the moon landings, it will be them. Likewise if anyone is going to affirm the truth, if it is so, that the moon landings were fake, it is going to be them. Yet not once did the Soviet Union dispute the reality of the lunar landings, why is that? It is because it is so ridiculous to claim the lunar landings were fake that not even the unscrupulous communists of the Soviet Union were going to do so?
Progressives are communists. Let’s drop the label “progressive” and call them what they are, “communists”!.
well it's nice if we can just deport all woke idiots to the moon, isn't it?
CNN Reports: The Russians Must Have Landed On The Moon!
And we are putting women on the moon too!!!
Too bad moon, the USA claimed your ass.
The second link proves nothing. The third link I wont watch bc I saw his flatearth doc and it was riddled with inaccuracies. I will check out the first link when I have time.
Probanbly because the interviewers came off as a bit assholish.
I saw the press conference apollo 11 gave after returning and it was much more strange than these interactions. The vid you linked (or at least the first few mins I watched) only proves old men get angry when their legacy is threatened.
Based. Sad I had to scroll this far. Eric dubay is good but I don't like his anti-Jesus stuff.
Kek
Hurry up Jesus I don't think you want us trying out for your job
MEGA MAGA
EARTHSLIDE
LandWhaleSlide.
Eww
Make it so!
Uranus is pretty comfy. ; )
G I G G I T Y
I just got my Make Space Great Again hat. We're gonna plant the first flag on Mars within a decade.
👌 This is Bigly!
I was 1000th upvote
We are rising to the moon!
The peace maker making the world great again
I had this picture (without text) as my laptop background all of 2016 my senior year of college. Crazy it’s already time to buckle down and MAGA again
this image but without the text has been my laptop's wallpaper for a few years now.
Very motivational.
The President of peace is making the WORLD SAFE AGAIN
One small step for People.
One giant leap for Peoplekind.
Did you just assume our species?
It's a typo. He meant to write "one small step for pepe, one.. giantleap for pepekind".
Solid gold world peace, Trump-style!
I love this!!!!! Great work pede! Bravo!
"Always has been."
Done
After we get bored with helicopter rides for commies, cab we do it with space shuttles?
Paiging Elon Musk
https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/from-a-million-miles-away-nasa-camera-shows-moon-crossing-face-of-earth_20129140980_o/from-a-million-miles-away-nasa-camera-shows-moon-crossing-face-of-earth_20129140980_o~orig.png
This "photo" is supposedly taken from even further away, yet the earth looks massive.
This picture used to be my phone background minus the text
Always has been
Better get to sewing, Canadians.
If kids saw the opening of 2001 Space Odyssey today they would chimp out harder than the opening sequence.
This photo is called Earthrise, it is from the Apollo missions and is perhaps the second most famous photo from the missions
https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/from-a-million-miles-away-nasa-camera-shows-moon-crossing-face-of-earth_20129140980_o/from-a-million-miles-away-nasa-camera-shows-moon-crossing-face-of-earth_20129140980_o~orig.png
Looks a lot closer in this "photo"
I thought the OP was taken from the moon, yet this one is even further away?
With God’s Help!!
A rat done bit my sister Nell.
(with Pepe on the moon)
Her face and arms began to swell.
(and Pepe's on the moon)
I can't pay no doctor bill.
(but Pepe's on the moon)
Pede's will Maga and Maga still.
Cuz Pepe's on the moon.
Incredible
Globalism that I can get behind
YES! Pedes you are so "in" within the elections right now (understandably) that I fear sometimes you may overlook the positive effects that Trump's admin has had (and another term will increase) on the whole free world. America is the last bastion for freedom and prosperity. It is she who holds the lantern high to light the way.
You must not fail.
Classic!
"Make the earth decline some more"
-Democrats
insert 2001 music here
Yes. I'd vote for him, and I'm not even American.
Good photo cover for fuhrerbook
MAGA over Moon.
Needs more black hole for diversify.
America should own the moon.
We need more "Trump for President of Earth" memes. xD Their rage will cause California to finally pinch off.