Will democrats be able to submit more "fraudulent" votes than are lost due to flaws/inefficiencies in mail voting systems? Is fraud a coping strategy rather than winning strategy? Obviously, this doesn't address using uncertainty as the weapon to win rather than actual vote counts.

• Given that more dems will vote by mail, a higher percentage of votes for dems will be lost/undelivered/etc than for reps.
• Are blue area mail systems capable of handling peak election mail throughput?
• The chokepoints in fraud systems are the activists who have to physically gather, submit, challenge, and process votes as well as lawyers at every stage.
• Significant percentages of mail votes have been discarded in recent elections.

(Fraudulent meaning post election votes, "corrected" votes, harvested votes, etc)