4484
Comments (298)
sorted by:
197
2020REBOUND 197 points ago +201 / -4

that the woman Trump selects is a gang rapist? lol

111
deleted 111 points ago +124 / -13
59
2020REBOUND 59 points ago +74 / -15

huh? If Trump is re-elected we are in for the best years of our life.

The past 4 were already the best years of America in a 100 years.

Trump will 100% select a woman to win the election.

78
Modus_Pwninz 78 points ago +81 / -3

Trump winning will make the years rocky. Not by his doing or because Trump is bad, but because liberals force it with their lies and actions against this nation.

2016-today is proof of concept. They will turn it up to 11.

If they can't ruin us legally with their policies, they create havoc to ruin our lives in other ways.

Either way, they seek to ruin and have been doing a fine job for decades.

But if they win...it will be so much worse; because they will destroy with the blessing of voters.

29
RiverRunnerVDB 29 points ago +32 / -3

If trump wins it will be because of epic voter turnout voting republican. It’s very likely that we won’t hear from the democrats again because they will be totally eviscerated and lose all political power and the sycophantic media will scramble to change their tune because their cover will be blown away.

51
Modus_Pwninz 51 points ago +52 / -1

Wishful thinking. That didn't happen after 2016...

25
deleted 25 points ago +26 / -1
31
Modus_Pwninz 31 points ago +31 / -0

I mean it's not like liberals are going to disappear.

If their current party is eviscerated, you'll probably see them double down and form a new party, overtly communist in likely all but name, promising sweet nothings, whispered into the ears of America's youth.

This problem isn't just going away...

21
RiverRunnerVDB 21 points ago +21 / -0

Trump wasn’t on the ballot in 2018 so the republicans didnt benefit from down ballot voting.

12
NazisWereSocialist 12 points ago +12 / -0

That’s a really good point that I hadn’t considered

Especially good because it gives me some more hope, even though it seems like we’re winning hard, I fear that this tension is coming to a head, and the deep state globalists are willing to do anything in their power to prevent our, the country and everything it’s ever stood for’s, victory.

Also if any cucks read this Nationalism, patriotism, and populism, does not equal fascism...

11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
Yawnz13 2 points ago +4 / -2

It's also been pretty common-place that mid-terms see lower turn-out. Even then, Republicans won most of the elections. Democrat gains were predominantly in areas where they were already well-entrenched.

1
Strike_Eagle784 1 point ago +1 / -0

Better to have wishful thinking then be a pessimist.

9
unicornpoop 9 points ago +9 / -0

I think it will be an epic turnout, and they will lose. But then the dem run areas will move to secede to cause further chaos. We are already seeing the dem cities encouraging antifa and blm to burn themselves to the ground for no other reason than chaos to make way for communist takeover. This is not going to stop until we CRUSH THEM. And by that I mean prison for treason and sedition.

4
Pure_Coincidence 4 points ago +5 / -1

And then we'll all dance and sing near the candy cane forest and hold hands and swim in the caramel waterfall!

13
BestTimeToBAlive 13 points ago +13 / -0

The one thing you’re missing is that we’ve seen their playbook already. It’s getting old, fast.

And Trump re-expected will be tougher, bolder and more punitive to the Ds than he was this first term. He’s got nothing to lose.... only the fate of the nation.

4
mateus 4 points ago +4 / -0

^^^^ This!

6
NazisWereSocialist 6 points ago +6 / -0

There’s no way to right this ship that won’t be rocky I’m afraid, let’s hope Trump can accomplish this mission in 4 more years with minimal violence, tragedy etc. I hope whatever is on the horizon remains isolated to the major cities, seriously, have an evacuation plan if you live somewhere like Chicago, not saying you should just abandon your home, nor am I saying you shouldn’t defend yourself, but it may come to the point of fight or flight.

4
JesusisKing 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes. THEY WANT US DEAD!

3
2020REBOUND 3 points ago +5 / -2

Only in in libtard cities which will lead to a bigger R majority in 2022.

No worries here. The more they burn down their own cities 'the better'.

19
Modus_Pwninz 19 points ago +19 / -0

Man, those are still American cities and a lot of us live there for work.

We just fled Minneapolis during covid, right before the race riots. Not everyone has the luxury of escaping...it took me nearly five years.

3
2020REBOUND 3 points ago +5 / -2

Sorry for your personally but things have to turn much worse before they get better IF there are not enough smart people there right now to turn it around.

How do you wake people up to Democrat evil if things somewhat go along slowly down to hell?

Always dumbfounded how some states vote for R governors only to then vote for a D years later, like Wisconsin, which to means some R voters didn't do their homework.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
Yawnz13 1 point ago +3 / -2

Usually that happens when some Republican governor either gets wrapped up in a big scandal or doesn't run again and the next Republican isn't as liked for whatever reason.

3
ThirteenPercenter 3 points ago +3 / -0

I live and work in a D city in a R state. Don’t punish me just because more than half of the voters here are retarded.

2
2020REBOUND 2 points ago +2 / -0

I feel ya, I wonder if these cities will be forever D.. just seems like some unwritten law.

10
ProdigalPlaneswalker 10 points ago +10 / -0

A justice will serve on the court for decades.

We'll only have Trump for 12 more years.

7
2020REBOUND 7 points ago +7 / -0

If Trump isn't elected the next 2-3 justices are communists.
This will be one of the biggest parts of the election and anyone Trump nominates is better than RGb.
I doubt he will select someone that will end America lol

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Gyrfalcon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not to mention the chaos that will be the SCOTUS confirmation. Bet they're already printing their protest signs with the blank line for the name.

2
2020REBOUND 2 points ago +2 / -0

Enjoy! :)

6
montominco 6 points ago +6 / -0

No way, that's identity politics. Biden had to pick a black woman (though the hoe part wasn't a requirement). Trump will pick the best person for the job because he's not racist or sexist.

4
2020REBOUND 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not about identity politics though. The best nominee is the one that wins him the election and hence saves America ;) Big Picture.

Basically all people on his list are good picks.

2
PierreDerelicto 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is SOME about it.

Whenever Trump talks about the X group unemployment, he's basically working in the temperature of politics. The key difference is he is not saying "Equal outcome is a human right" where communists just show their hand.

6
hai_Priesty 6 points ago +6 / -0

As a woman I prefer the process to be gender blind. May the most righteous and competent person gets it.

2
DeportAntifa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everyone here agrees it should be purely merit based, but we have to deal with the reality of the situation. If trump rams through a woman or a male of color it will make him less vulnerable to the identity-based character attacks that the left uses on a daily basis. We need to get this nominee in AND get Trump re-elected.

3
Cacciali_Via 3 points ago +4 / -1

No, they will still call him a racist, sexist, homophobe deplorable.

2
2020REBOUND 2 points ago +2 / -0

All people on his list are qualified. Obviously the election will be part of his selection too.
Nothing matters if he looses the election.

4
Tellsyouhow 4 points ago +4 / -0

Whereas I don't agree with "like for like" by electing a woman solely to replace a woman I think a female judge is shielded by her sex and cannot have the same level of allegations made against her.

It's fine in the longer term to nominate a man but so close to the election it needs to be a female to prevent the inevitable "Trump nominated rapist judge" allegations that might stop some sheep voting for him

16
deleted 16 points ago +24 / -8
4
OranjeBlanjeBlou 4 points ago +7 / -3

They downvoted him because he spoke the truth. Most people who hold a constitutionalist perspective aren’t black. Most people who hold a constitutionalist perspective aren’t female. He would have to go out of his way to find “muh woman of color” to fill the role, rather than selecting the best option.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
MadRussian 10 points ago +12 / -2

Exactly. No more women on SCOTUS please. Feminism has had enough influence to last several lifetimes.

Make mine Ted Cruz.

-1
BestTimeToBAlive -1 points ago +5 / -6

Cruz said he wants to stay in senate.

Look up Amy Coney Barrett. She a staunch conservative judge and my bet she’ll be Trumps pick. She’s fab!!

11
MadRussian 11 points ago +12 / -1

No. Just no.

I don't care about her credentials. Women are driven by emotions and hormones. We've had enough of that. The entirety of America has been feminized to the degree that men have forgotten the natural order of things, and allowed women to institute laws that ensure that natural order of things can not legally reassert itself.

We need to make bold changes towards reversing the feminization of American civilization. There are hungry and ruthless civilizations at our doorstep that will eat us alive otherwise, just as the barbarians ate Roman Empire.

The top legislative body of the land must be led by men, and laws must be made by men once again.

This is an existential crisis. It's ugly, but crises are never pretty.

8
BestTimeToBAlive 8 points ago +8 / -0

Lol you should look up her record.

She’s tougher than most men.

Also, don’t be so quick to judge women by the screaming banshee bitches on the left. There are plenty of us conservative women out there with incredible rational thought, persuasiveness & morality.

The top legislative body of the land must be led by men, and laws must be made by men once again.

SC is actually the top “judicial” body. And they do not make laws. They read them. You’re confusing it with the Congress.

2
MuhSoy 2 points ago +2 / -0

hey, this comment right above is EXACTLY why conservative women deserve to be GREATLY APPRECIATED and supported.

an SJW-Marxist-Feminist would scream and screetch and whine. BTTBA cautions you to take a second look and reconsider. a totally opposite type of response you'd see from the left.

yes, i too hate when women get roles because they're women. Conservative women, however, understand the importance of self-defense, the sanctity of human life, and the right to free speech. i'm married to one and raising one.

2
BestTimeToBAlive 2 points ago +2 / -0

BTTBA

👍 I like it!

i too hate when women get roles because they're women.

Same here. No diversity hire, affirmative action needed, wanted or warranted. Give the job to the best person. That’s all that matters.

1
MadRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

I phrased it badly. What I meant to say was supposed to be closer to "laws should be made and interpreted by men", but it was late and I was not sober.

I stand by the general idea of it though.

3
DZP1 3 points ago +3 / -0

The feminization is true. Look at the Democratic party - the males are either cucks or crooked, or commies - it's a requisite to be in the party hierarchy. I think they also hate Trump because he has a masculine attitude. He's not a soyboi, and he doesn't take shit, he fires back. I'm fine with his perspective. And the elite want a manipulatable feminized man or a crooked woman as president.

1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Has she publicly stated she wants to mass deport illegals?

8
gamexa 8 points ago +9 / -1

Yeah, too many women on the Court as it is.

4
Granite_MAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, but Trump is going to nominate a woman. Pro-life I really, really hope, but it will definitely be a woman.

5
BestTimeToBAlive 5 points ago +7 / -2

Amy Coney Barrett.

Conservative Catholic pro-life judge.

I heard that he didn’t run her last time bc he thought she’d be hard to get in since she is very outspoken on being an originalist w regards to the constitution

8
Granite_MAGA 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah, I remember that too and while I fully backed Kavenaugh against the Mob, I was not very excited about his views. Pretty open-borders, with a hint of Constitutional-fluidity. Not RBG though.

Now is when he will run Amy if she agrees to the fact that her life is never going to be the same again.

He's got the Democrats in a trap of their own making....they have wound themselves up into hysteria to try and fake (as usual) some kind of momentum because they know that nobody actually wants to vote for Joe Biden.

You add in a last minute play to push a pro-life Catholic into RBG's seat and fucking Armageddon is going to come to the streets of America as the demonic abortion worshipper coven of the millions of female Democrat voters touches off like vampires exposed to the sun.

That complete chaos and breakdown of all rational thought is going to cause the Democrats into a Gideon scenario mixed with the pigs Jesus cast the demons into. Destroying themselves in a psychotic fury while simultaneously jumping off a cliff.

Its a tactical nuke to turn their outrage machine against them. The blue areas are going to be a bloodbath of BLM slaughtering the cat ladies who are protesting them for distracting from their Holy Sacrement of Crushing Baby's Skulls.

For the love of all that is holy get out of the cities NOW.

3
Long_time_lurker 3 points ago +3 / -0

You add in a last minute play to push a pro-life Catholic into RBG's seat and fucking Armageddon is going to come to the streets of America as the demonic abortion worshipper coven of the millions of female Democrat voters touches off like vampires exposed to the sun.

For anyone who thinks the GP is kidding, go read reddit.com/r/witchesvspatriarchy

They're literally praising satan and lamenting RBG right now. They were casting spells and other nonsense to "protect" her a while ago too (you can see how that turned out...)

But yeah, with this one, we're going to need to stock up more ammo to defend our homes.

2
BestTimeToBAlive 2 points ago +2 / -0

Reading this made me laugh. And then made me sad.

Sad that the fact that ppl will take to the streets to riot w fire and pitchforks above what we’ve seen thus far, is a strong probability of he puts forth a nominee. And I think he will.

Sad that evil fucking left is more triggered by a fear of having less free abortions than anything else. It’s so scary how obsessed they are with it.

3
Granite_MAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every culture has a child sacrifice ritual to appease the same demons humans have been worshiping since the ancient times. Moloch and Ba'al are not statues with fairy tales people weirdly believed. They are real demons who demand the blood of children.

Abortion is our culture's blood ritual dressed up in a lab coat instead of a feathered headdress. And what's really spooky is how our culture worships people in labcoats the same way the ancients worshiped those in feathered crowns who demanded the lives of their children.

You can see it any video of rabid abortion supporters. They gnash their teeth, scream, howl, foam at the mouth, and actually chant Hail Satan. It is very spiritual and I believe demons feed off the negative energy of the millions of women whose lives have been devastated and who see the faces of their destroyed children at night as they cry themselves to sleep knowing they will never get to hold that little baby and say mommy is so very, very sorry.

21
ChrisSuperDude 21 points ago +22 / -1

It would force the left to admit that men can get raped, it would force the left to admit that men can be victims, it would force them to admit that women aren't perfect little angels who can do no wrong. I get why people are against him nominating a woman, but I half want Amy Bennett to be RBG's replacement just for the mental gymnastics and the possible brain aneurysms they will have over it. Hopefully it will unironically lead the left to take a "Repeal the 19th" position just to cope with what has happened.

13
ShakeNBake 13 points ago +14 / -1

Repeal the 19th is fine with me

-5
unicornpoop -5 points ago +3 / -8

Back to MGTOW reddit with you Oh wait...

10
ShakeNBake 10 points ago +10 / -0

Even my own mom doesn't like women in high offices of political power. Says they are too unstable and dangerous. Lol and I have a gf. Although MGTOW can be helpful for some. I admittedly almost went that route. Until the bullshit ca$h and prizes divorce con is fixed, marriage is a risky bet, including for conservatives.

2
Emperorvoid 2 points ago +2 / -0

It has to do with agreeability. Women are far more agreeable than Men. Men are more apt to negotiate. This also has something to do with the wage gap issue. Men tend to also focus more on logic instead of emotion where as Women tend to be the opposite... BTW, most liberal Men have female traits... But we already knew this. Not to disparage Conservative Women... They tend to be more on the logical side.

0
somethinga9230k 0 points ago +1 / -1

Genuine conservative women (not those that merely LARP as such) in "modern" times tend to have access to firearms. A woman that has no gun can be much more easily physically threatened and coerced by an average man, even without a gun, since women are on average physically much weaker than men muscle-wise. A women that does have a gun, on the other hand, is much more difficult to threaten and coerce physically. This doesn't fix everything, for there are other kinds of threats, coercion, etc. etc. etc. than merely physical threats, and there are a multitude of other aspects, such as women having the challenges of being less durable physically, but the 2nd amendment is an extreme help reg. meaningful, sustainable and actual equality.

(as a side-note, being less durable physically is a major reason why women tend to be very/extremely poor choices for front-line soldiers - see for instance the female marine corps officer that become infertile due to her work: https://archive.li/o7cQt , and she was one of the female officers that AFAIK took her job seriously and was capable and competent. And women being unavailable due to pregnancy can be critical reg. war. Other kinds of roles than front-line fighting can make much more sense reg. this, but there is still a multitude of aspects reg. this, some of which is changed in various directions by technological advances. There is also the issue reg. generational changes as well as survival, for if you in war only send men out, you can still replenish your people (including the part of your people that are willing and able to fight) given that the women stayed at home. But if you send out everyone.............. what consequences will that have for your people over generations? And then there is the issue of the kind of people that are willing to use women as cannon fodder....... women should have guns and have the competence, clarity and knowledge on how to use them, and they should not be forced or pressured to stand in the front line and be blown to pieces).

If you do not believe the extreme severity of the issue reg. coercion, including reg. politicians and judges, this is an extreme issue that applies to everyone, men included. Trump had the resources, organization, etc. etc. etc. to have his own body guards and not rely on the SS. Ronald Reagan, as far as I know, did not, and he was shot a few months into his presidency, and it is said that he changed course greatly after that shooting, such as reg. "amnesty" for millions of illegal invaders late in his presidency. And then consider the many other shootings, assassinations, etc. etc. etc., such as reg. John F. Kennedy, Seth Rich, Scalia, etc. etc. etc.

2
Emperorvoid 2 points ago +2 / -0

After being shot, I think Reagan played ball.

4
ThirteenPercenter 4 points ago +4 / -0

You haven’t lived with a woman going through menopause I’ll bet

8
2020REBOUND 8 points ago +9 / -1

I don`t need Amy, there are other woman on his list.

Any woman of the list will do it. Very hard for R cucks to not vote for and it will all be about abortion destroying Kamala Harris on the Judicary Committee.

13
terrichris 13 points ago +13 / -0

She's a RINO, and will be worse than Roberts.

Adopted babies from Clinton's Haiti so open borders.

Also pro-BLM

https://cookcountyrecord.com/stories/553524774-appeals-court-pritzker-ok-to-limit-or-not-limit-religious-political-gatherings-to-combat-covid-19

Find another Clarence Thomas

-1
2020REBOUND -1 points ago +3 / -4

Adopted babies from Clinton's Haiti

good for her and the kids, better than raping or eating them...

Nominating her will win the election though when she faces Kamala Harris in Senate judicary, 7 of her kids behind her while Democrats rave about abortion lol
The adoptions alone will destroy D's arguments for abortion for the next 20 years.

But I guess if she's that bad Trump wont nominate her.. it's that easy, other woman on the list.. I have no worries.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
2020REBOUND 2 points ago +3 / -1

She will put them in re-education camps to turn them into patriotic Americans.

Whatever guys, Trump will nominate the right candidate. stop crying.-

1
RPD2 1 point ago +2 / -1

She's pretty anti-white if she's adopting black kids (virtue signaling) and is pro-BLM. No way would I want her near anything political.

4
Granite_MAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

We should be brainstorming the attack vectors against a woman rather than preemptively laughing about rape allegations. Of course they won't go down that road.

I believe their primary strategy will to (sexistly) attempt to destroy her emotionally so that she drops out. Watch how sexist and "HAHAHA....Women can't take the heat of politics!!!" they get the instant she's nominated. They're going to go after her like 30's New York City stockbrokers descending on a woman who dares to suggest she can be a stockbroker too. Its gonna get all retro-sexism up in this bitch.

And no, before anybody starts making "But you guys are hypocrites" memes its not going to matter. That is not a valid attack strategy either at them or at the general public to counter it. The general public will already know that but the Lefty's won't care. The Democrats won't care any more than they care about being caught calling black conservatives "Uncle Toms" and "dumb n-words".

1
LesboPregnancyScare 1 point ago +1 / -0

I remember the CCPeddit screenshots of Kavanaughs angry face with captions that he is unstable. All for looking angry. Imagine not getting angry when ruthless satanists gather to falsely mass accuse you of rape and its broadcast to the general public.

4
bitterbut_true 4 points ago +5 / -1

We were ALL on board 3 years ago for Amy...she's already passed the pede vetting process. But it would be a super distraction...they'd falsely bludgeon her as a catholic nutter that won't let women have abortions. Can Trump weather this now?...6 weeks out. Mitch would have to get it done and dusted in two weeks max; so its memory holed 4 weeks out.

1
BeanieGuac 1 point ago +1 / -0

What if they say she raped a woman?

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
17
EpicPede 17 points ago +27 / -10

please don't be a woman

25
MythArcana 25 points ago +28 / -3

I agree. We will have immigration issues coming up and women will stumble left on that every time, among other things. I want a based version of Andrew Dice Clay in his 30s.

2
KonyHawk_ProSlaver 2 points ago +2 / -0

lmao I never realized Dice has a great judge name

-2
JuicyfearsMAGA -2 points ago +6 / -8

To be fair, I trust Amy Barrett on these issues, more than I'd trust John Roberts or any justice except Thomas or Alito.

I think she'd make a great justice, and it would benefit Trump to select a woman.

After he's reelected and gets another court pick, or 2? Yes, he needs to pick a staunch, strong, man, similar to Scalia

11
unicornpoop 11 points ago +11 / -0

NO. Why is everyone kissing her asshole on this site? Hm

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
7
MythArcana 7 points ago +7 / -0

From what I understand, she's a pro-BLM advocate. I need confirmation on her stances with leftist agenda and a blood oath to God. She will be raked over the coals like anybody else in her confirmation, believe me.

5
JuicyfearsMAGA 5 points ago +6 / -1

What proof is there that she is pro BLM terrorism? I'd be really interested to know where people are getting that info!!

6
MythArcana 6 points ago +6 / -0

She voted for limited religious gatherings while BLM is tearing up our cities. That's a huge strike against our Constitution.

https://cookcountyrecord.com/stories/553524774-appeals-court-pritzker-ok-to-limit-or-not-limit-religious-political-gatherings-to-combat-covid-19

3
aaafirefly123 3 points ago +3 / -0

When was this, if it was the first 2 weeks of the lockdowns in which everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, including this site, was TERRIFIED of COVID. So if this ruling happened in the first 2 weeks I’ll allow it in the since that she thought of a worst case scenario (like we all did) and made ruling to prevent that worst case scenario.

3
JuicyfearsMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you for the link. That is quite a disturbing ruling

3
MythArcana 3 points ago +3 / -0

Had a Pede in here who just posted links tonight. I'm trying to find them, but this issue will definitely come up if she's in the running.

4
2020REBOUND 4 points ago +15 / -11

of course it will be a woman. Trump is smart.

Will hand him the election, destroy Kamala and hand him 2 more judges which will be male I guess..

2
EpicPede 2 points ago +4 / -2

what?

2
2020REBOUND 2 points ago +4 / -2

what what?

6
unicornpoop 6 points ago +7 / -1

Because shills want to convince us that we have to play identity politics to win. We win by playing ball breaking, no apologies, patriot MEN.

2
2020REBOUND 2 points ago +4 / -2

I trust Trump to make the smartest play.

Lot's of dogmatic people on our side that are not that smart and nimble looking at big picture.
Can`t wait for you to call Trump a shill when he nominates a woman to play Democrats and win the election.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
-12
td_didnt_kill_itself -12 points ago +7 / -19

Amy Coney Barrett is based tho

Edit: why is this being downvoted? Before kavanaugh was chosen this entire sub had a hard-on for her

19
EpicPede 19 points ago +22 / -3

No she is not. Not at all. BLM cuck and weak on immigration.

10
UpTrump 10 points ago +10 / -0

I want Ted Cruz

4
ObamasLooseButthole 4 points ago +4 / -0

So you still want a female justice

3
UpTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
WildSauce 3 points ago +3 / -0

If he went to the court now then there would be a special election for his replacement. We would certainly win that election. The democrats couldn't even win an election in a midterm year when they dropped tens of millions of dollars on the seat, so there is no way they would win a special election. And then that replacement would have 4 years to establish name recognition. I don't think we would have a senate problem if Cruz was appointed.

I don't think that Trump will actually appoint Cruz, but a man can dream.

2
FarageHommage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump would 100% appoint Cruz but Ted has already stated he wants to stay in the Senate for now.

9
unicornpoop 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's almost like her fucking campaign team is on every thread tonight.

7
EpicPede 7 points ago +9 / -2

well they can fuck off

6
meals23 6 points ago +6 / -0

preach

2
Soros 2 points ago +2 / -0

She has said she will refuse to enforce the death penalty.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
2
LesboPregnancyScare 2 points ago +2 / -0

that is the playbook.

5
jjacksonRIAB 5 points ago +5 / -0

Barrett raped a woman in 1994 while wearing a realistic Bill Clinton mask after traveling through Don Lemon's black hole.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
2020REBOUND 2 points ago +2 / -0

DAMN RIGHT! And she's Ralphy Northams KKK buddy!

2
jjacksonRIAB 2 points ago +2 / -0

She was also the shooter on the grassy knoll when she was -9 years old.

75
McFatty7 75 points ago +75 / -0

BREAKING: Dr. Ford says the next nominee had raped her 30 years ago!

21
GodEmperorUSA 21 points ago +21 / -0

Whoever it is is, their guilt is indelible in the hippocampus.

7
basedtexapede 7 points ago +7 / -0

And the story is backed up by all muh beach friends.

8
UpTrump 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ah yes, Amy Barrett raped her!

4
BladderBeerPoopin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Id watch that.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
48
AlcoholicRetard 48 points ago +48 / -0

Amy touched my weiner.

18
FluhanWu 18 points ago +18 / -0

Calendar or it didn’t happen.

17
wartooth6 17 points ago +17 / -0

It's ingrained on my hippocampus

5
PartandParcel 5 points ago +5 / -0

Kek

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
7
ArdentGrasshopper 7 points ago +7 / -0

We'll believe you if you're a woman.

4
otistoole 4 points ago +4 / -0

You wish

1
ValhallaGorilla 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice

1
WildSauce 1 point ago +1 / -0

Congrats pede

48
pursuitoftruth1776 48 points ago +48 / -0

Suddenly Ted Cruz, who's ran for president, been in the senate for many years, been in the public spotlight for a long time, has 999,999 "survivors" come out and accuse him of raping them 600 years ago.

And drinking at some point in his life.

13
ArdentGrasshopper 13 points ago +13 / -0

I think he wants to try for the Prez bid though, on 2024.

9
KonyHawk_ProSlaver 9 points ago +9 / -0

He doesn't have the right personality. Same problem Rand had. They're both perfect in the Senate.

1
realPhantomFuck 1 point ago +3 / -2

Zodiac can't become President

11
CastlesMadeofSand01 11 points ago +11 / -0

Can't be Cruz. Need him to vote for the nominee. We're already looking at Romney, Murkowski, and probably Collins abstaining or voting no. Every single remaining R vote is needed.

29
CovefefeREEEE 29 points ago +29 / -0

I like beer.

8
NikolasConservative 8 points ago +8 / -0

nice comment

5
Freeflow488 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tom t hall agrees

1
Work2gethrBiglyOrDie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Boof

24
ImReallyRich 24 points ago +24 / -0

The media is already saying people will riot if the republicans try to nominate somebody.

Let them do it. Not like they’ve been peaceful the last 4 months anyway

17
JamesSunderland 17 points ago +17 / -0

"Our protests are going to become even more peaceful!"

11
PartandParcel 11 points ago +11 / -0

If they riot it’ll just make more republicans. That’s why they cancelled their commie siege

15
Wemann 15 points ago +24 / -9

Pick a woman, problem solved. #BelieveAllAmyBarretts

28
BestTimeToBAlive 28 points ago +29 / -1

You think sweet lil catholic boy kavanaugh got it bad?...

They’re gonna go apeshit of Amy Coney Barrett. They’ll make her a racist, since they can’t make her a rapist.

Only one letter change so it’s easy for ‘em.

11
JuicyfearsMAGA 11 points ago +14 / -3

When they attack her for being a Catholic, again. Biden's been parading his Catholicism around and claiming Trump isn't Christian.

It'll be easy to attack the Dems on their hypocrisy if they go that route

8
BestTimeToBAlive 8 points ago +8 / -0

Pelosi is even a “Catholic”

And as a practicing Catholic, I can say that liberal “Catholics” are shitty ppl.

4
JuicyfearsMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Absolutely true. It's not the Catholic that makes them shitty, its the liberal part.

Pelosi, Diane Frankenstein, Durbin, all attacked Barrett relentlessly over her religion when she was up for nomination in the lower courts in 17. She's a great woman, and her main knock was lack of experience. I think appointing someone who might serve for around 30 years, on our side, is extremely important.

1
LesboPregnancyScare 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pelosi admitted she is a shabbos goy and married off her children to jews. I dont care which brand of christianity anyone claims to practice, serving another master goes against the first commandment.

Thou shalt have no other gods before me

5
Shallers 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh sweet summer child. Dems are totally immune to calling them hypocritical, rolls right off their backs.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
3
Penguinrevenge 3 points ago +3 / -0

C'mon man

6
CastlesMadeofSand01 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes. They will come up with an ex-boyfriend from 30 years ago who claims she goose stepped like Hitler or some other equivalent salacious nonsense.

2
BestTimeToBAlive 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’ll only hurt the left.

They looked disgusting during kavanaugh & if they try this shit w her, they’ll actually look worse.

5
CastlesMadeofSand01 5 points ago +5 / -0

They really don't care about optics at this point. It's all about raw power. It's civil war right now.

If they can find a way to obstruct / delay a vote on filling Ginsburg's seat, they will do it. In my opinion, that includes violence. It sickens me, but there is no low they will not stoop to achieve their goals to eliminate Trump..

4
BestTimeToBAlive 4 points ago +4 / -0

If they resort to any more violence, they will lose even harder. They might be loud and taking over media, movies & schools... but they are still the minority.

Edit to add: I worry about Trump’s safety. The left has no depths to how low it can’t reach.

5
whippeat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Racist? Her two black adopted children might disagree, rofl.

That’s partly what makes her a good candidate. They have NOTHING on her.

1
LesboPregnancyScare 1 point ago +1 / -0

imagine believing dems have to have something to claim any kind of __ism: racism, sexism, whatever.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
2
OranjeBlanjeBlou 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because that would ensure we pick a white male candidate

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
13
UpTrump 13 points ago +13 / -0

BLM cuck. See her recent ruling on churches

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
13
WAstateConservative 13 points ago +13 / -0

Looked through Trump's list (https://www.scotusblog.com/2020/09/trump-releases-new-list-of-potential-supreme-court-nominees/) and this one looks really great: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allison_Jones_Rushing. Woman (harder to attack with 20-year-old rape hoax accusations). 38 years young. I think she's the youngest among all the people on Trump's list Clerked for Gorsuch when he was on the 10th Circuit. Clerked for Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Member of the Federalist Society.
I think the Dems would have trouble if they tried to torpedo such an impressive, accomplished woman in the confirmation hearings!

2
farfiman 2 points ago +2 / -0

The will attack her on LGBT stuff.

3
whippeat 3 points ago +3 / -0

That’s fine. LGBTQPAblahblah is a vote loser anyway.

13
Freeflow488 13 points ago +13 / -0

Here in pennsylvania philadephia shit fuck hole. Drinking whiskey, ccw, at a party. Subtly redpilling libfags all night. One additional vote for Trump is a fucking victory. Must continue.

6
Yucky 6 points ago +6 / -0

Good job, be safe!

12
Trump4a3rdTerm 12 points ago +12 / -0

"This is very good. Will points out that the Democrats have forfeited the right to have hearings because of how they treated Kavanaugh, as well how they behaved in the sham impeachment. Skip the hearings and go straight to a vote." https://twitter.com/HansMahncke/status/1307148863711711233?s=20

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
11
Kaarous 11 points ago +13 / -2

It's probably going to be Amy Barrett, so I would love to see them try. I want the entire country to see the Democrats scream and howl and spew slurs at a well mannered white woman.

9
everylastjuan 9 points ago +9 / -0

He's way too old, but nominating Bork would cause them all to melt into a pile of salt.

9
MythArcana 9 points ago +9 / -0

Man your stations, Pedes!

PREPARE FOR BATTLE!

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
Spark-001 4 points ago +4 / -0

Full meme jacket!

7
daddywhippedcream 7 points ago +7 / -0

Free Kekistan

5
sustainable_saltmine 5 points ago +5 / -0

Shadilay

6
LLegendary 6 points ago +6 / -0

muh-hippocampus!!!! muh-hippocampus!!!! reeeEEEEEEEE!!!

6
NO_RINOs 6 points ago +6 / -0

Remember, if the dems in the senate aren't freaking out by making up ridiculous against Trump's third supreme court pick, then you know that pick is a RINO like Gorsuck or Roberts.

5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
5
wapsi109283 5 points ago +5 / -0

Have to admit Im looking forward to them trotting out some libtard cuck who talks in “baby voice” that he was raped by some MAGA girl.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
KekistanPM 5 points ago +5 / -0

She turned me into a newt!

2
RussianBot_23198a 2 points ago +2 / -0

A newt?

4
everylastjuan 4 points ago +4 / -0

[insert name here] sniffed my eardrum when I was in college. That's why I had to install an extra door in my basement.

4
AbrahamLincoln 4 points ago +4 / -0

[Insert pick here] sexuallty assaulted me 37 years ago by [insert plot from a tv show]!

4
behemoth887 4 points ago +4 / -0

"the new supreme court nominee is literally hitler and raped this woman that we found back in the 70s probably"

1
JamesSunderland 1 point ago +1 / -0

Inb4 the pick is a woman.

4
PartandParcel 4 points ago +4 / -0

_______________ touched my weewee in 1987 while I was watching crocodile Dundee and eating corn pops.

3
Nanteen 3 points ago +3 / -0

I heard Amy drugged and raped 10 men 5 years before she was even born

3
TheSuperStableGenius 3 points ago +3 / -0

No guarantee the Republicans hold the Senate and now with RHINO romney trying to fuck everything up, murkowski saying there's not enough time and weak collins saying no you have to ram this through...I guarantee SCOTUS will have to decide this election like 2000 with these illegal aliens mailing it in, can't do that with a 4-4 court, you want to see a real crisis? Speaking of illegals having a voice, I've told the census guy 4 times to fuck off. You want to count illegals and give them representation in Congress? Suck my dick I'm doing my part.

3
Tcrlaf1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dems are fucked.... The SCOTUS nomination will bury all of the dirty tricks they intended. And they have already burned out any rioting goodwill they may have had. And, as an added bonus, the Never-Trumpers HAVE TO PLAY NICE NOW, to have any hope at all of re-election. Except for Romney....

3
buckiemohawk 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Funny thing with RBG was that she hated what they did during the Kavanaugh. And said can we turn towards more civility. Yet, she didn't want to leave because of Roe vs Wade which is ridiculous. Its going to be law and never reversed.

3
UnclePorkchops 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nope, I'm pretty sure senate can just vote a new justice in.. none of that circus show of confirmation will happen... of course democrats will use it as election fodder ..

3
PeytonManThing 3 points ago +3 / -0

We have to fight 4-5 cuckservatives who care more about arbitrary procedure than the lives of babies

3
Afeazo 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have already seen Reddit accuse Trump of poisoning RBG and saying things will be "fucky" during the autopsy. These people live in an alternate reality.

3
JamesSunderland 3 points ago +3 / -0

I can almost see the spine of the Republicucks softening once Trump chooses. Mitch needs to prop them up with sticks and duct tape and get on with the vote.

3
NimblePepeCentipede 3 points ago +3 / -0

You are right OP but the Left is going to have to choose....

Black Life Matter/Antifa Peaceful Riots!!

OR

Supreme Court Justice Clown Show!!

Theres not enough time for both.

2
55thPresidentofMars 2 points ago +3 / -1

Definitively needs to be a woman to avoid that whole hidden accuser circus with only 45 days left.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deekarmy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Prediction, Deep state will allow Trump to nominate and appoint. Democrats have been losing ground. Using this political theater will allow them to paint Trump as a tyrant for going against the unwritten rule of not nominating during election year. And thus gain voters this November.

4
ImReallyRich 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not the same. Obama had an opposite party majority in the senate. Trump doesn’t. And if the seat gets filled the democrats have nothing to vote for

1
Gyrfalcon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Opposite party Senate and it's Joe Biden's rule.

2
monochromedout 2 points ago +2 / -0

ya'll thought Kavanaugh was bad. Wait until they do worse to a WOMAN. I promise it is coming. That or some insane event happens where the Senate is out of session and literally can't vote or have enough GOP'ers to advance. I feel some bad shit coming now. We know Romney will pull a McCain. Who else will? They need what, 3 or 4 total....

But we knew it would get worse the closer to election day. Trump and Mitch are the men for the moment. Say what you want about Mitch, there is no one I would want fighting on our side in the political arena, especially this close to election, when shit gets disgusting af. His re-election is up to, so you can be sure he is on our side for the next couple months until the dust has settled.

2
Emperorvoid 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump will likely release a list. Liberals will attack every single person on the list with absolute bullshit. Trump will then nominate someone not on the list. Liberals unprepared quickly make up new bullshit... But too late!

1
farfiman 1 point ago +1 / -0

He already put out his list last week.

2
Quesadilla 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shoot better start digging up calendars

2
MagAdmin36 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shits about to go down

2
RogueLeaderX 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree that Trump should replace Ginsberg with a woman. Get Janine Pirro on the phone! 😁

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
letrain 1 point ago +1 / -0

Allegations? The deep state would not take out ginsburg like they did scalia.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SomeGuysCat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rest assured dems right now are meeting to discuss how to stop this and expect a statement from Biden something to the effect: “If Trump nominates someone before the election and the senate confirms, I promise to create three new supreme court seats if I’m elected.”

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0