623
Comments (37)
sorted by:
57
geneticMessiah 57 points ago +59 / -2

Looking forward to a better nominee than this.

31
Dingus 31 points ago +31 / -0

Honestly, the idea that this seat belongs to a woman is nonsense. It literally doesnt matter who we put up, these lunatics will go bananas, so why not just put the best person up? What are they gunna do, continue rioting like they already were?

9
IAbsolutelyDare 9 points ago +9 / -0

I say the candidate who provokes the biggest riots wins, so (based and qualified) white male here we come!

9
Chelsea_hubbell 9 points ago +10 / -1

Tucker for SCOTUS!

8
TrumpsWall 8 points ago +8 / -0

Cruz all the way

2
DeplorableWeWin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unfortunately it can’t be Cruz bc his vote is needed to confirm

7
MeSewCorny [S] 7 points ago +11 / -4

I'm pretty sure Trump chooses her. We dont have the time for a circus, especially with Romney, Collins and that other RINO cunt who voted no on Kavanaugh.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
4
2016TrumpMAGA 4 points ago +5 / -1

No shit. This crazy cultist would make Roberts look like a solid conservative. She'd be another Anthony Kennedy.

19
deleted 19 points ago +20 / -1
10
Djashburn 10 points ago +10 / -0

I'm not sure if it's a "pick a woman because they're a woman" or a "Dems are gonna do some fucked up shit to block any appointment and they'll have a harder time blocking a woman nominee" kinda thing.

If nothing else the Clinton appointed justice Steven Breyer is 82 years old, the Pres might get a 4th scotus appointment in his second term. Maybe a 5th if someone finally starts asking Roberts what he was doing on Epstein's island

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
Djashburn 4 points ago +6 / -2

I get what you mean but this isn't left vs right tug of war, it's a 3d chess game. We may have to sacrifice a bishop (nominate someone quickly) to put their king in checkmate (foil any thing they have planned such as mail in voter fraud). Everything POTUS does is measured and carefully planned, he won't let us down.

1
FullAutoFlintlock 1 point ago +1 / -0

My body is ready

12
yallsegregationist 12 points ago +14 / -2

i like her less and less. the president has put out 2 list with over 40 candidates

7
Niqlndym 7 points ago +8 / -1

That’s her sister

4
VoterIDMatters 4 points ago +5 / -1

As long as she adopted legally

Last thing we need is another situation like that

2
blumenkraft 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every time a white woman adopts african children I think of virtue signaling. Like, no local children to adopt, really?

1
VoterIDMatters 1 point ago +1 / -0

Totally

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
SharonaZamboni 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump pretty much has to nominate someone who has zero skeletons in their closet. We all saw the lies and horrific bullshit they pulled on Kavanaugh. The need for squeaky clean narrows the pool considerably.

2
MeSewCorny [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. Everyone screaming about not liking ACB but we have 45 days to election and we dont have time to jump through the lies and circus and fake rapes from a dozen women coming out of nowhere. If we didnt have traitors like Romney, Murkowski, and lukewarm like Susan Collins we could push through whoever. Right now we can afford 3 no votes and use Pence to break the tie, but who knows who else we'll have that might vote no. Time isnt on our side. People need to use a little common sense on this site.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
OutcastSeal 2 points ago +14 / -12

Have your own babies with your wife, fucking cuck.

19
Yupyupyup 19 points ago +22 / -3

They have five biological kids, they adopted two. Also she's 48. Chill pede.

6
OutcastSeal 6 points ago +14 / -8

Looks to me like 6 years down the line, she'd flip blue and start being pro-critical race theory

10
Yupyupyup 10 points ago +10 / -0

Honestly I don't disagree. I want to see someone in there right, I mean hard right, not just some fucking center-right shill that will go along with whatever. I don't really think she's the best good choice. On the other hand, strategically it might be smart to get someone in there fast, to deal with the post-election fraudulence that is definitely coming. I'm sure that GEOTUS knows better than us. Was just saying lay off with the kids thing, they had a special needs child and probably started adopting then. I would have too. If she's a bad candidate, she's a bad candidate, no need to go there.

3
epicgamer 3 points ago +4 / -1

I agree. And the fact that she had to adopt black kids is cringe. likely influenced by a "I'm not racist I raise black children."

If you're so afraid of being labeled racist you'd pull this shit, you might as well not be in a position of power.

2
OutcastSeal 2 points ago +2 / -0

THIS

2
HazelHen 2 points ago +9 / -7

Seriously, what a cuck.

0
deleted 0 points ago +7 / -7
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Dudemanfoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I find it VERY interesting that the OP of the twat was either gay or supporting gay... and looks like a Trump supporter...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-3
Sexual_Assault_Rifle -3 points ago +1 / -4

I like to think these are his kids from 2 previous affairs during their marriage.

-6
unique_string -6 points ago +2 / -8

Is dat sum baby importing sick fuck pedos?