An animal that looks like it has a strong patriotic horn - but seen up close, the horn turns out to be a pink faggot dildo with a COVID mask and a Hillary 2016 sticker on it.
Sometimes they are democrats that are in a district where a democrat cannot win, so they just call themselves a republican and support a couple inconsequential republican policies.
And then sometimes they are straight up controlled opposition. Examples of this:
John McStain
Lindsey Graham
Mitt Romney
People might balk at the idea of Romney being on the list, and think he's just a turncoat, but I don't think so. Obamacare was based on Romneycare, Romney's healthcare policy. It was clearly cooked up together by the joint democrat/republican uniparty, the "permanent political class" as they are sometimes referred to. Romney has always been one of them.
Also, I suspect eye-patch man is a newly seeded controlled opposition RINO.
Yes I am. Dan Crenshaw. That's the reason why I think the gigantic cucks on SNL had him on and apologized to him. Because they actually want the right to embrace him, since he's controlled opposition. He hangs out with lefties all the time, he talks like a lefty, and he proposes things that no conservative ever would, like red flag laws.
I could be wrong, because there isn't really enough evidence to say for sure, but my gut says he is not really a conservative/republican.
Romney isn't pedocrat or republican. He's deep state. He's controlled opposition. His only purpose is to be the insane out of touch republican boogieman that pedocrats can point to and say look at how rich and out of touch he is, he hates the common people. They purposely ran him in 2012 to further destroy the Republican's party image
RINOs are easy to spot: 1. the pressitutes love them, and 2. they generally vote with the party on non-important issues, but without fail, vote with the communists on important issues, e. g., McCain on Obamacare repeal; Murkowski (Present vote) on Kavanagh....
Lindsey Graham is probably the BIGGEST Rino of them all.
WEALTH, FAME, POWER, John McCain, the king of the RINOs attained this and everything else the republic had to offer, and his dying words drove countless souls to the streets
"you want my power, you can have it!! I left everything i gathered together in one place, now you just have to find it
These words drove cuckservatives to the Senate Floor in pursuit of power greater than they could ever dare to imagine. This is the time known as The GREAT RINO ERA (AKA Clown World)
No one answered your question. The answer is they easily can. There are most likely more. You don’t think that Richard Burr wouldn’t take this opportunity to get out of the trouble he is in just by voting no?
That ruling is horrifying. Also approving governors being kings and having authority to violate the constitution and religious freedom. Disgusting. She is scum.
I'm looking at the opinion, and I think it's actually a very pro-religious rights opinion. the SCOTUS should not hand out rulings based on political associations. that's not how it goes.
You should see some of the looks I get when I make this argument to friends of mine in person. You’d think I slapped a baby in the face in front of them.
Even so called conservatives are either afraid to acknowledge biology or have bought into the blue pilling.
The women and men are just alike crowd. That works until XX needs someone's ass kicked or something heavy moved. Or they get cornered on a tough decision in the boardroom and then here come the waterworks. I've seen it ALL.
I’ve watched a project manager for a large ERP system (who was a woman) break down into flooding tears and ugly, shriek crying over being pressed on a question about a completion date for certain modules. She did all of this in front of internal executive staff and external staff from a large software company.
She’s still with this organization, although on a different, smaller project. They couldn’t even fire her over that because they are afraid of the repercussions, yet they had no problem firing one of our internal developers because he spoke out about all the waste and mishandling that was occurring on the same project.
Ruth’s death was specifically planned most likely with her consent for this exact date for a multitude of reasons. There is not enough time to fill seat. When they try, all it takes is a few Senators to say no. Calling Burr. The senate votes are saved because at least they tried. The date of death was on the eve of the Jewish new year. Death on this day meant that the person is considered exalted.
Her death gets in the way of the roll out of the Durham report, energizes the relatively flat democratic base, turns the Supreme Court into an 4x4 tie that would take the ruling of the lower court. Don’t worry, the path upward through the courts to contest the election has already been mapped. This is why they continued to say that he would refuse to leave office. This path forward would be legit.
Oh yeah, this was absolutely planned and I believe the Trump admin got word of this info a few weeks ago...This is why Trump released that shortlist of potential Supreme Court nominees before RBG died
A golden opportunity on a sliver platter. Senate GOP could literally not have been handed a better opportunity. If they mess this up you know where their intentions lie
I don't disagree with you at all I just hate that Mitch wasn't smart enough to forsee the tables being turned on him. He has given them unearned ammo to fire back at him and drag Trump into this. Now Obama is calling him out and saying rules should be applied consistently.
Remember when Trump said the Republicans didn't know how to win and he would teach them? Class is in session, Mitch.
Obama was leaving to an antagonistic Senate elected to counter him. Trump is the incumbent candidate to a Senate that supports him. Of course we would dely the SCOTUS pick.
Respectively disagree with the hypocrite part. The idea was that a president in his final term in office with no hope of reelection whose party lost the senate to the opposition shouldn't nominate before an election. That the people elected the current senate majority as a check against the direction the country was going.
If the democrats had won 2016, well, that could be seen as a refutation and authorization to nominate. The fact that Trump won in 2016 reinforces the idea that people were skeptical of Obamunism, and Obamunist judges. That the republican senate majority held in 2018 also reinforces that.
The fact is, Trump has the support of the people right now, and is running for office while previously Obama was out of favor in the lead up to an election he couldn't even participate in.
There is no hypocrisy here as the situations are not the same, and the principle involved is consistent. The equivalent scenario would be if, in 2024, democrats had control of the senate and Trump was in his final year, and some other republican was running for re-election. We all know for damn sure democrats would 100% block it. They'd block even if it was day 1 if they could, and would block for all 8 years shamelessly.
We're literally weeks away from electing Trump to his second term, and I'm literally not sure if he's even gotten 100% of his initial appointments yet. I think he might have, but they blocked his starting day 1 cabinet for years.
Though I do overall agree with your sentiment that all is fair. With the democrats openly declaring they will stack the Supreme Court next time they are in power, with the openly abusing the impeachment mechanic, with them openly planning on contesting an election they know they are going to lose, most likely causing a civil war would could lead into a world war...
Fuck the democrats. Give them nothing, and take from them everything. Only once they are completely routed can the spell be broken and they can have a chance to mentally heal. As is right now, they've so deeply embraced sin, the various weaknesses of the mind, that they are incapable of self correction.
It is a game and that's why republican MUST confirm a new justice before the election.
If they don't then democrats will be energized to vote for a Biden-named justice. He'll say he's going to nominate a lesbian woman of color who's an illegal immigrant and they'll all pokemon go to the polls to vote for the supreme court not for Biden.
If Trump gets a replacement confirmed then the oldest one at 82 is Breyer and will almost certainly last 4 years so they will not have the court as a reason to vote. They could vote out of spite for fast tracking a replacement right before the election, but they're already full of spite.
“There is nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last years.”- RBG . IF RBG was such a staunch defender of the Constitution, why was it her alleged dying wish to ignore the Constitution?
This is the most cogent argument for moving forward quickly. The Dems have created a mess with universal mail-in voting and it is imperative that someone be confirmed in order to break ties.
The phrase constitutional crisis has been so overused it's lost all meaning. Similar to racist and sexist.
We are past the point of negotiation. Maybe if the pedocrats would have even attempted to negotiate with us, they would be in a better position. But no instead they doubled, tripled, and even quadrupled down on their stupidity, and lost anyways.
Even if there is a constitutional crisis I don't care. The only way we will fix this country is by watering the tree of liberty with pedocrat blood.
This is the last time the Republican Party can redeem itself. If they screw this up, it is over for them.
I wish somebody here could explain to me how the four Senate RINOs cannot fuck this up even worse than Kavanaugh.
What's a RINO?
An animal that looks like it has a strong patriotic horn - but seen up close, the horn turns out to be a pink faggot dildo with a COVID mask and a Hillary 2016 sticker on it.
LoL best answer I read all day. 🤣
Right out of the centipede dictionary...
And stop calling me RHINO.
I can visualize that.
You win the internet today
A person who says/runs as Republican, but votes/partners Democrat. "Republican In Name Only" ie traitors
Souter, Stevens, Roberts
Republican In Name Only. Somebody who is under the Republican party title, but behaves and/or votes against party values.
Gotcha, thanks for that. Would lindsey graham be considered a Rino? I sometimes question his loyalty to the republic.
Sometimes they are democrats that are in a district where a democrat cannot win, so they just call themselves a republican and support a couple inconsequential republican policies.
And then sometimes they are straight up controlled opposition. Examples of this:
John McStain Lindsey Graham Mitt Romney
People might balk at the idea of Romney being on the list, and think he's just a turncoat, but I don't think so. Obamacare was based on Romneycare, Romney's healthcare policy. It was clearly cooked up together by the joint democrat/republican uniparty, the "permanent political class" as they are sometimes referred to. Romney has always been one of them.
Also, I suspect eye-patch man is a newly seeded controlled opposition RINO.
Eye patch man? Are you talking about the navy seal dude? Dan something?
Yes I am. Dan Crenshaw. That's the reason why I think the gigantic cucks on SNL had him on and apologized to him. Because they actually want the right to embrace him, since he's controlled opposition. He hangs out with lefties all the time, he talks like a lefty, and he proposes things that no conservative ever would, like red flag laws.
I could be wrong, because there isn't really enough evidence to say for sure, but my gut says he is not really a conservative/republican.
Romney isn't pedocrat or republican. He's deep state. He's controlled opposition. His only purpose is to be the insane out of touch republican boogieman that pedocrats can point to and say look at how rich and out of touch he is, he hates the common people. They purposely ran him in 2012 to further destroy the Republican's party image
mitt is 100% RINO. anyone who was against trump is a RINO and should be laughed out of the public eye
Yes. Graham is a RINO.
RINOs are easy to spot: 1. the pressitutes love them, and 2. they generally vote with the party on non-important issues, but without fail, vote with the communists on important issues, e. g., McCain on Obamacare repeal; Murkowski (Present vote) on Kavanagh....
Lindsey Graham is probably the BIGGEST Rino of them all.
WEALTH, FAME, POWER, John McCain, the king of the RINOs attained this and everything else the republic had to offer, and his dying words drove countless souls to the streets
These words drove cuckservatives to the Senate Floor in pursuit of power greater than they could ever dare to imagine. This is the time known as The GREAT RINO ERA (AKA Clown World)
Yes. Crenshaw, Kasich, Capito are examples
DINOs don’t exist, RINOs are real. No elephants are pretending to be DINOs. RINOs are jackasses in cosplay.
that west virigina guy is a DINO, but only when it's an election year
Republican in name only
No one answered your question. The answer is they easily can. There are most likely more. You don’t think that Richard Burr wouldn’t take this opportunity to get out of the trouble he is in just by voting no?
unfortunately the GOP is famously full of cowards
Sen. Susan Collins
Sen. Chuck Grassley
Sen. Lisa Murkowski
Sen. Mitt Romney
The answer is to nominate a woman, Amy Barrett, then how could those 4 women be against it?
With about 8 kids, many adopted. Which is lovely. But she folds after the first anonymous phone call from the Deep State.
Can't find anything that. Hate to be like a libtard, but your statement makes it warranted:
wHeRe YoUr sAuCe?!?!11
Thanks so much for that link. A nice preview of her jurisprudential thinking. And did y'all notice the gender composition of the 3 judge panel?
That ruling is horrifying. Also approving governors being kings and having authority to violate the constitution and religious freedom. Disgusting. She is scum.
I'm looking at the opinion, and I think it's actually a very pro-religious rights opinion. the SCOTUS should not hand out rulings based on political associations. that's not how it goes.
NO WOMEN!!
They are very susceptible to bleeding heart bullshit .
Take this woman lawyer's upvote. I'm done with female chiefs of police and mayors too..
Take my upvote in return. Not being able to speak freely about biological norms of the brain is just PC newspeak bullshit for the "conservatives."
You should see some of the looks I get when I make this argument to friends of mine in person. You’d think I slapped a baby in the face in front of them.
Even so called conservatives are either afraid to acknowledge biology or have bought into the blue pilling.
The women and men are just alike crowd. That works until XX needs someone's ass kicked or something heavy moved. Or they get cornered on a tough decision in the boardroom and then here come the waterworks. I've seen it ALL.
I’ve watched a project manager for a large ERP system (who was a woman) break down into flooding tears and ugly, shriek crying over being pressed on a question about a completion date for certain modules. She did all of this in front of internal executive staff and external staff from a large software company.
She’s still with this organization, although on a different, smaller project. They couldn’t even fire her over that because they are afraid of the repercussions, yet they had no problem firing one of our internal developers because he spoke out about all the waste and mishandling that was occurring on the same project.
I’m so glad I am no longer there.
I just got called a Maren in another thread. That's ok. My point still stands. This is PC bullshit, right wing style. Tough cookies.
Governor Noem seems to be the one in a million that uses her brain over her feelz.
Not only smart and logical, but totally hittable too.
And DAs. Female district attorneys are almost always either a joke or a deep state plant (thanks, Soros!)
IDGAF what you do. I'm tired of OLD WOMEN.
Maybe your women.
Amy Barrett for the win!
Weak on immigration unfortunately
Wrong again. She voiced a very strong 2A opinion.
https://www.pfaw.org/blog-posts/confirmed-judges-confirmed-fears-amy-coney-barrett-tries-to-overturn-law-banning-people-convicted-of-felonies-from-possessing-firearms/
Is she really not Pro 2nd?!?!?
Lol they dont care.
It blows my fucking mind that Grassley would cuck to this when he sat as chairman for the Kavanaugh hearings.
Grassley is fine
If Susan Collins refuses to confirm, she can say goodbye to her seat. Republican voters will not cast a vote for her.
His argument is right on the mark....
If the DEMS DRAG OUT THE RESULTS.... And it heads to the SUPREME COURT, we need 9 judges.... not 8.....
It is actually critical the 9th judge be seated BEFORE THE ELECTION!
Ruth’s death was specifically planned most likely with her consent for this exact date for a multitude of reasons. There is not enough time to fill seat. When they try, all it takes is a few Senators to say no. Calling Burr. The senate votes are saved because at least they tried. The date of death was on the eve of the Jewish new year. Death on this day meant that the person is considered exalted.
Her death gets in the way of the roll out of the Durham report, energizes the relatively flat democratic base, turns the Supreme Court into an 4x4 tie that would take the ruling of the lower court. Don’t worry, the path upward through the courts to contest the election has already been mapped. This is why they continued to say that he would refuse to leave office. This path forward would be legit.
Plenty of time to fill the seat.. many vacancies are filled in 30-40 days.
Trump already released his nomination list - so we know the short list.
Oh yeah, this was absolutely planned and I believe the Trump admin got word of this info a few weeks ago...This is why Trump released that shortlist of potential Supreme Court nominees before RBG died
As soon as I saw that press conference I knew she was a goner any moment now. Of course that’s if you believe she hasn’t been dead for months already.
We could fill a seat in days the big long show you have become accustomed too is all political grandstanding that does not need to happen.
This will actually energize Republicans far more, they've historically been motivated by SC issues more than the left.
Asap actually. This mail in/harvesting shit will come sooner than that.
A golden opportunity on a sliver platter. Senate GOP could literally not have been handed a better opportunity. If they mess this up you know where their intentions lie
Regardless of the need to do it because of a contentious election people need to realize that politics is not a game of footsies.
Is McConnel going to be a hypocrite? Yes. So the fuck what??? This isn't a game this is for keeps. The GOP owns the Senate, they should wield power.
Power flows to those that use it, it has flowed left for a century because the left isn't afraid to use it.
I don't disagree with you at all I just hate that Mitch wasn't smart enough to forsee the tables being turned on him. He has given them unearned ammo to fire back at him and drag Trump into this. Now Obama is calling him out and saying rules should be applied consistently.
Remember when Trump said the Republicans didn't know how to win and he would teach them? Class is in session, Mitch.
Here's a very simple response for Mitch.
Respectively disagree with the hypocrite part. The idea was that a president in his final term in office with no hope of reelection whose party lost the senate to the opposition shouldn't nominate before an election. That the people elected the current senate majority as a check against the direction the country was going.
If the democrats had won 2016, well, that could be seen as a refutation and authorization to nominate. The fact that Trump won in 2016 reinforces the idea that people were skeptical of Obamunism, and Obamunist judges. That the republican senate majority held in 2018 also reinforces that.
The fact is, Trump has the support of the people right now, and is running for office while previously Obama was out of favor in the lead up to an election he couldn't even participate in.
There is no hypocrisy here as the situations are not the same, and the principle involved is consistent. The equivalent scenario would be if, in 2024, democrats had control of the senate and Trump was in his final year, and some other republican was running for re-election. We all know for damn sure democrats would 100% block it. They'd block even if it was day 1 if they could, and would block for all 8 years shamelessly.
We're literally weeks away from electing Trump to his second term, and I'm literally not sure if he's even gotten 100% of his initial appointments yet. I think he might have, but they blocked his starting day 1 cabinet for years.
Though I do overall agree with your sentiment that all is fair. With the democrats openly declaring they will stack the Supreme Court next time they are in power, with the openly abusing the impeachment mechanic, with them openly planning on contesting an election they know they are going to lose, most likely causing a civil war would could lead into a world war...
Fuck the democrats. Give them nothing, and take from them everything. Only once they are completely routed can the spell be broken and they can have a chance to mentally heal. As is right now, they've so deeply embraced sin, the various weaknesses of the mind, that they are incapable of self correction.
All well and good but a simple "Life isn't fair" is good enough. The senate has the power to confirm or not as they see fit.
It's not hypocritical. He was and is represented his base. That's his job.
It is a game and that's why republican MUST confirm a new justice before the election.
If they don't then democrats will be energized to vote for a Biden-named justice. He'll say he's going to nominate a lesbian woman of color who's an illegal immigrant and they'll all pokemon go to the polls to vote for the supreme court not for Biden.
If Trump gets a replacement confirmed then the oldest one at 82 is Breyer and will almost certainly last 4 years so they will not have the court as a reason to vote. They could vote out of spite for fast tracking a replacement right before the election, but they're already full of spite.
“There is nothing in the Constitution that says the president stops being president in his last years.”- RBG . IF RBG was such a staunch defender of the Constitution, why was it her alleged dying wish to ignore the Constitution?
How many RINOs will not vote? Let's keep them in check
this dude grew his patriot beard for this special moment in history. he's ready to let his balls HAAAAANG
Lion mode activated
This is the most cogent argument for moving forward quickly. The Dems have created a mess with universal mail-in voting and it is imperative that someone be confirmed in order to break ties.
He's out of the running now, we need his vote and he can't vote for himself.
The phrase constitutional crisis has been so overused it's lost all meaning. Similar to racist and sexist.
We are past the point of negotiation. Maybe if the pedocrats would have even attempted to negotiate with us, they would be in a better position. But no instead they doubled, tripled, and even quadrupled down on their stupidity, and lost anyways.
Even if there is a constitutional crisis I don't care. The only way we will fix this country is by watering the tree of liberty with pedocrat blood.
Well of course GEOTUS's nominee is going to say that!
Put Ted Cruz on the supreme court. Id prefer Rand Paul but hes a Doctor more than a lawyer.
I got news for you; there is already a crisis
It’s going to be tough, there’s 37 working days left on the senate calendar until the 2020 term ends for the senate
They’ve still got stimulus work and the last two nominations took 39 and 42 working days.
The Dems can drag this out all the way, it’s a race.
Sounds like Vegas odds though
He is absolutely correct.
Time to put a pro 2A constitutionalist and start passing some serious rulings asap
And herein lies the reason that she "died" now
Sorry Teddy it's not you. If it's you it's another 2-3 year long federal investigation at my expense because you're high profile.
I don't want to pay that. Shouldn't have had to pay for the last one.