4159
()
posted ago by TBTGXOR ago by TBTGXOR +4159 / -0
Comments (71)
sorted by:
61
Fadedglory 61 points ago +61 / -0

Because just like everyone of the "Ruling Class ELite" of Washington D.C. they think they know better than us deplorables.

57
nozonozo 57 points ago +57 / -0

She was a flawed thinker and an activist.

Her job was to rule according to the constitution, period.

Ruth Bee Gee wanted to use international court rulings as precedent for American law. She didn't understand, at it's core what her job was.

32
I_Love_45-70_Gov 32 points ago +32 / -0

I believe she understood her job description perfectly, yet, chose to take a communist shit on the American people.

22
DivvyDivet 22 points ago +22 / -0

This. The leaders on the left aren't stupid. They know what they are doing is wrong. They know they can manipulate the useful idiots with empty promises. Assume their treasonous acts are intentional, because they are.

7
Ask_If_Im_A_Cactus 7 points ago +7 / -0

A lot of them actually are stupid

RBG was not one of the stupid ones, nor is Obama

Pelosi used to be a competent politician, but now is old and has TDS

Good thing Biden is an idiot and Harris isn't very clever

4
Calico_fox 4 points ago +4 / -0

They're what I call Stupid Evil, those who are Stupid Evil will do anything to maintain the power they have however their efforts can easily & unknowingly lead to their downfall.

-4
Dr0neRec0very -4 points ago +3 / -7

I always knew democrat politicians are detached and pompous, but it wasn't until this year that they really showed they believe themselves to be royalty.

3
Leatherwood 3 points ago +3 / -0

Her mission was to subvert the Constitution. She performed admirably, and I am sure her masters were pleased. The vacancy created by her departure will be filled with ruthless precision, and the new justice will be her mirror opposite.

18
LibsAreBabyKillers 18 points ago +19 / -1

Was thinking the exact same thing about the precedents of international courts. Lets just stop the charade that these people are above politics. They're political actors just like everyone else in government.

6
Visolatte 6 points ago +6 / -0

She knew. Her job was to undermine the Constitution so that her fellow collectivists could impose their will not through the ballot box, which would never happen, but through judicial fiat.

18
Grady_Wilson 18 points ago +18 / -0

The Crypt Keeper also said she would not use the US Constitution as a model if she were creating a new country.

So, she is a SCOTUS justice but thinks that the Constitution would not be a good model for a fledgling country?

Fuck that old hag.

Burn in hell.

6
swimminginthoughts 6 points ago +6 / -0

The entire country of Liberia disagrees with her on this.

2
Leatherwood 2 points ago +2 / -0

She said she wanted to model a new constitution for us similar to what they have in South Africa.

37
fjobb 37 points ago +37 / -0

Who fucking cares what her wishes are? Politics are way too divided at this point for that sort of foolishness. If she had stepped down willingly maybe you could consider it (I still wouldn't), but when she holds on as long as absolutely possible and dies while in the seat because she's such an ideologue, well she obviously was not working right up until she actually died. She was just trying to hold the seat so Trump couldn't fill it, complete derangement just like McCain. Pathetic inability to let go of power and just enjoy their sunset years.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
21
NoMoreMao 21 points ago +21 / -0

Exactly. She was a Marxist cunt.

4
Stinkynuts 4 points ago +4 / -0

Was

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
19
myswedishfriend 19 points ago +19 / -0

Claiming she defended the Constitution is laughable, since RBG directly stated that any country looking to adopt a constitution should cite ours as an example of what not to do.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
10
FRENS 10 points ago +10 / -0

She's not a mini-dictator... we don't respect the edicts of some random public servant. This is a Republic, we follow the rule of law. It says that the President nominates Justices which are then confirmed by the Senate. If she wanted to change how the Constitution works, she should have lobbied the congress to introduce and pass legislation to do so. Too late.

10
BeachCruisin22 10 points ago +10 / -0

Absolutely zero chance those were her dying words.

Zero

7
DivvyDivet 7 points ago +7 / -0

Don't care about her totally made up dying wish. The SCOTUS doesn't have a say in who gets put on the bench. Checks and balances. The people voted for Trump. He gets to decide. Bitch should have stepped down under Obama, but she chose to wait for Hillary. That's RBG's problem, not the citizens.

5
RockyMin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep, dems fucked themselves again. Just like they always do.

2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +2 / -0

It shows how little regard they actually held for her that they pimp her death for politics.

6
makethemwatch 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's super telling that a judge simply following the constitution gets a special moniker like "Textualist". The defining characteristic of a liberal judge vs a conservative one is a willingness to redefine the constituion because its a "living document". If the meaning of a document can change arbitrarily for no reason then it never had meaning in the first place.

6
BirthHole 6 points ago +6 / -0

It wasnt her dying wish.

It was a phrase the DNC added to her press release to use as a rallying call to place peer pressure on senate republicans to forestall any nomination attempt.

2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +2 / -0

And now we have three RINO pieces of shit that are against confirming Trumps pick, not even knowing who it is yet! Fuck Murkowski, Collins and Romney

1
BirthHole 1 point ago +1 / -0

Opportunists will do their thing..

6
okayfilet 6 points ago +6 / -0

The USA are a constitutional republic. You don't pick your successor like in a fucking shithole autocracy. Fuck her alleged wish.

6
redditadminssuckit 6 points ago +6 / -0

She never said it. Her activist daughter made it up

1
booblitchutz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyway her last words were probably a year ago.

5
Ithrowawaay 5 points ago +5 / -0

Let the mass triggering begin!!

Strap in Pedes, we are in for a ride!!!!

2
booblitchutz 2 points ago +2 / -0

They can’t help themselves, of course, but they will not be helping themselves to flip shit over this.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
4
julianReyes 4 points ago +4 / -0

They don't give a shit about anyone. That's why communism is laughable to anybody who adopts it, because as soon as they die their "comrades" are going to strip their body of any valuables and flesh like a horde of insects while their sphincter is loosening. All the while their mind in its death throes is still thinking they're going to be on top and rule over all the "suckers."

5
ignorant_slob 5 points ago +5 / -0

She was always trying to rewrite it, not defend it.

4
CmonPeopleGetReal 4 points ago +4 / -0

We get to spit on her dying wish. Bye Felicia

4
Jutts 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have a feeling her daughter is a liar. Made it up as a last ditch effort to try to stall the inevitable.

4
Deathlessly 4 points ago +4 / -0

She's a Narcissist. She believes she knows better than the ones before her.

3
Bubbahax 3 points ago +3 / -0

She never gave a crap about the Constitution. Look at her rulings.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
MechanicalMarvel 3 points ago +4 / -1

Got em!

3
rentfREEEE_since2016 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don’t think the people that like RGB even LIKE the constitution. . . I’m not joking, I don’t think they even consider it.

3
SavingPrivateGrace 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looks like she knew she could vote, even when she's dead.

3
HumblePede 3 points ago +3 / -0

As if a SC seat is inherited like a throne? Well, that makes sense given the left's sense of entitlement and superiority.

3
snuggs316 3 points ago +3 / -0

i keep remembering that scalia and rbg were besties; maybe he kept her baser instincts in check and she lost that after he was murdered. she was openly partisan regarding prez maga, insulted him and publicly discussed politics. so it is not outside the realm of possibility that she did utter these words.

but...if she didn't, and the left is pretending that she did---The Powers That Be sullied her reputation in death. as another pede stated, "rbg can't put the court seat in her will." of course, she's dead, so what do they care? just about everything the left pulls, backfires on them.

2
Wohwoh1911 2 points ago +2 / -0

She was a Libtard Cunt,not a hero not a trailblazer,just a privileged Cunt at the right time for privileged Cunt.

2
Veylis 2 points ago +2 / -0

She didn’t even respect the constitution.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Jan. 30, 2012: You should certainly be aided by all the constitution writing that has gone on since the end of World War II. I would not look to the U.S. Constitution if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012. I might look at the constitution of South Africa

2
drsowells1fan 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's the South African constitution she had the hard on for. Not ours.

2
dagoat4l 2 points ago +2 / -0

Commies believe in one thing and its not the US Constitution

2
philnmdg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let’s blame it on the corona virus.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Redked 2 points ago +2 / -0

I doubt she even said it. Her commie Dem relative was just lying for the propaganda perks.

2
DontTreadOnThee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Twat was not a constitutionalist, was a communist.

2
EagleRod 2 points ago +2 / -0

KABOOM!

2
Staatssicherheit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Her dying wish was entirely consistent with her living wishes/rulings.

2
julianReyes 2 points ago +2 / -0

uuuuuh she's a woman bitch are you a misogynist are you one of those "n-cells" why would you even criticize her i bet you hate mattress girl toooooooo

2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

She is consistent. She always.ignored it.

2
Joanie-Detlefsen 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe her last wish was to make the journey on Rosh Hashanah eve or whatever it is. Not saying it's engineered anyway other than the quantum field. And brava for her, and to her. Glorious ending to a very obstacle strewn life.

2
Methodmapper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well said!

2
Butcher_bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because she was a Christ rejecting, demonic jew.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
joemalarkey -2 points ago +1 / -3

probably because Merrick Garland wasn't admitted when there was almost a year to go until the election, so it was fair to think that's how the supreme court works now.

5
NotProgCensored 5 points ago +5 / -0

The constitution says nothing about denying confirmations during election years.

1
joemalarkey 1 point ago +1 / -0

so you're saying it's OK to deny confirmations during election years (so it shouldn't have been done in 2016) or that it isn't OK to deny confirmations? Or are you saying since it's not in the constitution we can do whatever we want and consistency and precedent doesn't matter?

2
Staatssicherheit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you seriously think Obama couldn't have talked Collins or Lisa Murkowski into voting for Garland? Merrick Garland was not seated on the Supreme Court because there was bipartisan support against his nomination. They thought Hillary was going to win for sure.

1
booblitchutz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Man, fuck Garland. The democrats have time and time again shown they have zero interest in honorable actions. They pull shady shit constantly and have for decades. They haven’t stopped fake crying over Garland yet and they never will, but they’ll fuck over the Republicans endlessly without a moment of self awareness.