yes get it right. Biden doesn't know what is going on. if its day or night. RBG i bet she could not talk for at least a week. coma. so i doubt she said anything. and yes my typing sucks
Every time she doesn’t have an answer for something (which is every time) she just cackles like the drunk slut at a party. That’s all the Dems have, is Kamala the cackling slut, and Joe the stale nut. Best strategy, is to hide both of them.
Man, I fucking forreal think some Pedes got into high levels of the Democrat party, just to push Kamala and Biden as viable candidates. Because I legit can not believe the left thinks they're fucking going to landslide lol.
Same delusion they had in 2016, "if we assume all the swing states go blue then the blues win by a landslide". Before it was "they voted blue before so we think they will again" now its "Trumps mishandling of the coronavirus means that literally everyone will vote blue so if Trump wins it means he cheated democracy"
I guess it's like that Eddie Murphy movie (Distinguished Gentleman; great movie btw). They want people to 'Vote for the name you know'. They probably were the two biggest names on the Dem ticket this year.
I mean with literally millions of unrequested, unverified "vote by mail" ballots without postmarks just floating around out there that were sent to dead people, pets, etc what's to stop them from being targeted by tech algorithms and people harvesting them after Nov. 3rd? All you need is a teeny tiny fraction of the millions to make a landslide either way. A couple hundred here in this close district, a couple hundred there in that swing district. Boom, I just illegitimately forced my candidate of choice into the presidency using "legitimate" ballots.
Yeah, lol. I guess she can either say “duh” and let drool fall off her chin, or she can bust her best laugh, and try to fool the NPC’s into thinking something charming and whimsical is happening.
Its a great time to pull up clips of her harassing Kavanaugh and make ads about it.
She's going to pull the "its disrespectful to try to replace her" card and we should all respond "since when have you cared about respect for the Supreme Court?"
Yep! She’s gotta get busy interviewing scriptwriters and actors for the upcoming allegations play. The life of an Executive Hoax Producer is very demanding!
Four years isn’t a long term by any means and President Trump hasn’t been permitted anything like a real four year term. Fighting off multiple coups and monstrously bigoted media has hugely diluted what he would have achieved unimpeded.
Despite all that he’s accomplished so much more than the globalists ever wanted to.
Yeah, well McConnell was pretty steamed with the whole incident with Reid and "The Nuclear Option" and since Dems wanted to play politics instead of being fair McConnel played politics too. And he was better.
The Senate has to vote on the SCOTUS for a reason, and it’s to provide checks and balances. If Obama had done a better job the Senate would have been Democratic and he would have been able to push through his nominee.
But he did a poor job and the Senate was Republican....pretty sure House might have been too.
The argument at the time was that a supreme court justice could not be confirmed during an election year. We are in the same situation here. What arguments do we have against being hypocrites?
Hypocrisy? The Democrats changed the game in 2013 under Harry Reid. I remember when Bill Frist floated the nuclear option way back in 2003 or 2004 and the Left went nuts. They changed the rules, constantly shit on our history/traditions but now want to invoke some rule that is not actually a law? Gentleman's agreements only exist if both sides are Gentlemen.
President Trump has a duty to nominate a Supreme Court Justice. The Senate has a duty to vote on those nominees. As President Obama once said, "elections have consequences."
As mentioned below, the logic behind the rule is that the people vote specifically because of the supreme court. If there is a mismatch between president and senate in terms of not knowing what the political desire of the majority is, then you wait for the next election to see.
Eg. If the senate had flipped to democrats in 2018, you would wait to see if trump was rejected in 2020 by the voters too. But the republicans kept control of the senate, so there is no conflict.
Similarly, in the previous case, it was a democrat president but the senate had flipped to republican. So they waited to see the results in 2016. The people rejected the democrats.
I would like to see them ratify new amendments that puts in term limits for senators and congress, as well as upper bound age limits for all elected federal government roles. If you were to turn 80 or above while in office, you do not qualify
Hrm. So you'd be fine with the Dems packing the courts if (big if) they win both senate and presidency and also control the house? because that's politics and they played the game properly?
But those are the rules and this how the game is played.
Did Obama wait to nominate someone after Scalia died? No. And I don’t think he should have waited. If they had a Dem senate at the time I wouldn’t have blamed them at all for getting someone in the seat. But America didn’t like the direction he was taking us in and in 2014, 2016 and 2018 the Senate has been a Republican majority.
If America doesn’t like how their states are being run then they can vote the other way and power will shift back. Our system isn’t perfection but it’s pretty damn good and kind of a beautiful thing to watch, even when it’s not in the favor I’d like to see it go.
There are some cultures better than others. In my culture we believe in equality of opportunity, in competence-based hierarchies, in the right to life, in the freedom of women.
Gangster Culture and Islamism are the cancer of the world
It's also the root of the problem that the BLoMe movement is supposedly trying to fix. Hip Hop Rap culture has bred a throng of lawless losers who hate the police and law and order.
Eh, I'd say a group of people with a higher IQ than average purposefully promoted thug culture of rap and hip hop.
But art is, like, art, man. Who can deny the intricate introspection and commentary of such works as Juvenile's Back That Azz Up or Akinyele's Put It In Your Mouth? Don't be racist.
Those darn higher IQ people and their promotion of degeneracy. Literally never ends. Look at the famous "melting pot" catchphrase and realize it came from a playwright named Israel
I've heard it's exquisite. I fear my intellectual levels will fail me in trying to understand a certified masterpiece, so I am putting off my indulgence in Cardi B's genius use of metaphors and symbolism.
I'm reminded of one day when I was in my study, leaning over an oaken desk, pondering the meaning of Tupac's Rather Be Your N.I.G.G.A, in particular the part where he boldly exclaims, "so we can get drunk and smoke weed all day". Is he making a statement on existence and the existential feeling of aging? Or is he perhaps diagnosing the biggest obstacles to world peace and harmony? Our prophets, I mean rappers, have left us with so many important questions to ponder and debate.
Debatable though, some early hip hop artists wanted to about big ol butts and others wanted to rap about being fat/eating all the time. It was more about the beat than fucking any police
Does Roberts have to die to get a new Chief Justice? Cause he has really been fucking shit up for us. Would have been better off with RGB as CJOTS cause the rulings would have been the same and she'd be dead.
Because one of the few things he does know, aside from how to read from a teleprompter, is that nothing he does is going to matter to him in a few months or so.
It's a false equivalence to compare this to Scalia's replacement. They like to ignore that when Mitch McConnell said we should wait to select a new supreme court justice under Obama we were near the end of Obama's second term. There was going to be a "new" president either way when Obama's time was up.
Biden's OWN proposal put forth that Justices shouldn't be nominated when the President and Senate aren't politically aligned. Per his own beliefs, we'd need to nominate someone right now. (Seems like being a career politician has fucked him yet again.)
Then you have issues like if it's a contested election and we risk a 4-4 vote. (Which has happened fairly recently - Bush v. Gore - and can very likely happen again given how Michigan and Pennsylvania Democrats are actively trying to steal their votes with their bullshit counting rulings.)
You also have Ginsburg's own comments regarding Garland and her saying "The President is President for four years", meaning Trump still has the complete right - even in her own view - to nominate.
Trump and Obama's situations are also different as Obama was on his last term and without question we'd have a new president while Trump is only finishing his first term.
And, what I find especially most delicious of all of this, the Democrats have already decided that ceremony, mutual respect, and tradition went out the door LONG AGO when they politicized impeachment proceedings (because "orange man bad") trying to sway midterm elections. They have NEVER - not once - granted any form of respect or kindness to our side (from the very clearly partisan impeachment to the Kavanaugh debacle, both being utter lows for our nation). So fuck 'em. What goes around comes around. I want him to select a justice that will make Thomas look liberal and I want that justice on their for decades.
This was the best comment I read on r/politics while mining for salt last night:
“We’ve all been saying that this coming election will be the most important election of our lives, but it turns out that election already happened. The most important election of our lives was 2016 and it’s over.”
Part of me would just love it if it happened after the re-election, because they'd all die of horror. But if they had that carrot in front of them they'd push harder to cheat, get someone on the bench now that won't uphold their election shenanigans when the fight inevitably ends up in the S.C. before January 21st.
You know they will install a full on commie as soon as they get the chance. The Constitution is clear - there is no reason to do anything other than affirm and swear in President Trump’s nominee. The democrats riot, burn and loot no matter what we do, and this is why we voted for him, and the senate it the first place. #DoYourJob
That’s why I voted for the first time like my life depended on it. Anybody with half a brain could see how many Supreme Court justices were going to be picked. And we could not let that corrupt woman pick them. Now since taking the redpill it’s quite apparent the whole Dem party is corrupt.
Exactly this. Anyone with eyes could see. People always think SCOTUS is along party lines, but really you are choosing between activists who will derail our society based on the Zeitgeist OR preservationists that respect our Constitution and recognize that our society has lasted this long because of our Constitution.
this is the ULTIMATE fuck you to the left! trump god dammit. DO NOT PLAY BY THE RULES!! mitch! do NOT play by the rules! the leftist democrat shitlords WOULD NOT DO THE SAME!!
RAM IT THROUGH!! ram the fucking judge through NOW. fuck the left. give them a knockout punch then a killing blow on nov 3rd.
I might get downvoted here but I think this is the time for Republicans/conservatives to extend an olive branch to the left. Tell them, "you're right, we will hold off on the pick" and make them always remember that we are the ones with principles. America will have the chance to vote on the Supreme Court pick on November 3rd. Maybe by us doing this, we can pull back the extremes from both sides and work together towards making America great for everyone, with less vitriol.
....said some cuck loser who hasn't been paying attention. Mr. McConnell, jam that pick down their throats and take pleasure in it! Eat a dick, lefties!!
One only needs to ask yourself. Would the Democrats do this if in the same position? Would they have done that in 2016 too if they controlled the senate and a Republican was in office? I think we all know the answer to that.
Romney is fucking garbage so he'll be a no. There's the 2 squishy girl GOPS that may go no based on past comments. Toomey who knows. 50 is still good enough with Pence standing by, right?
It's a simple, long-precedented thing. If the American people choose to give the senate to the opposite party from the President, then the American people are choosing not to let that President fill a seat in an election year. The senate thus acting as a check on the President. If the American people choose to give the senate to the same party as the President, then the American people are granting that President their permission to fill seats right up to the day he leaves office.
The guy you're replying to is correct. Republican Senate leaders declared that because Scalia's seat had become vacant during an election year, the Senate would not even consider a nomination from the president.
I know. People keep derailing the discussion. I was just letting you know that the guy was right, in that the republican senators who said they would never appoint a SCJ during an election year were technically hypocrites (per definition). And there's nothing wrong with that, what's best for the America comes first!
Split President and Senate. Republicans control the senate and presidency. The Biden rule was just for when they are different parties. It would be fucking retarded not to confirm when the Senate and President are the same party.
While I do 100% agree with you in that he should appoint a new Judge, it is definitely hypocritical. Republican Senate leaders declared that because Scalia's seat had become vacant during an election year, the Senate would not even consider a nomination from the president.
If anything, that makes this so much more juicy. I can't wait to see their reaction!
That definitely wasnt the conclusion the Senate came to back in 2016. You are just misleading people. The Senate was under no compulsion to approve Obama's nomination, because they werent from the same party. If it was a democrat Senate you could have bet they would have pushed it through.
How am I misleading? I'm 100% for Trump picking a judge for the vacant seat, I was just letting you know that the guy you were replying to was, in fact, right.
Also, I'm absolutely not implying that Trump is a hypocrite, just the republican senators who said they would not consider a nomination during an election year.
The rationale being they are 2 different parties back then. The Senate is well within its right to not affirm Obama's choice.
Now both the WH and Senate are the same parties.
It doesnt make them hypocrites. They are functioning within their constitutional authority. Thats the whole purpose of Senate affirmation (checks & balances in a multi party (2 party) democracy), otherwise it would just be a rubber stamp approval.
I know. People keep derailing the discussion. I was just letting you know that the guy was right, in that the republican senators who said they would never appoint a SCJ during an election year were technically hypocrites (per definition). And there's nothing wrong with that, what's best for the America comes first!
Cocaine Mitch didn't have to confirm anything because Republicans ran the senate. Obama was a Democrat. Biden rule is for when a different party runs the Senate to justify stopping THE OTHER PARTY from getting a pick near a lame duck election.
There's no logical reason to stop the appointment pick of OUR GUY. There's no precedent for that because it would be fucking suicide politically.
Dude, I'm agreeing with you, he should pick it. I was just letting you know that the guy you replied to was correct. Multiple republican senators claimed they wouldn't consider a replacement during an election year.
The guy you're replying to is correct. Republican Senate leaders declared that because Scalia's seat had become vacant during an election year, the Senate would not even consider a nomination from the president.
No, the Senate didnt consider it because the Senate and the WH were not the same parties. The Senate specifically mentioned it was under no compulsion to approve a Justice nominated by a sitting lame duck president.
Its not really hypocrisy at all. Senate has complete authority to not affirm the President's nomination if it feels so. This is the power provided to the Senate by the Constitution. When the President and Senate are from opposing parties, there is no compulsion on the Senate to do so.
There's two facts they left out. One, not only did we have an election in 2016, nomination of SCOTUS justices was a key campaign issue. It was one of the primary issues that got people out to vote. WE VOTED! Now we need our votes to count!
Two, Ginsburg made her choices, not just personally, but as a SCOTUS judge. Those decisions should be just as final and consequential as any other decision she made as a justice. She could have retired during Obama's term to ensure that the Democrats got to nominate her replacement. We don't know why she did that. Maybe she was making deals with the Clintons, and rested on the assurance that Hillary was going to win. Who knows. She made a decision to extend her term into Trump's presidency. Then she decided to hold on to her position well beyond reason for her age and health clearly trying to out last Trump's presidency. She voted on key issues that should have been made by a Trump replacement. Now, she didn't make it. Voters have had to put up with her unconstitutional rulings for four more years. Enough is enough. She's dead, and Trump is our president. Every Republican in the House and Senate need to pull every favor, use every leverage, make every threat, to get every vote needed to get this job done. We need to throw out every Republican in the House or Senate if they don't get this done by the end of Trump's term.
They completely ignore the fact that, at the time, I was speaking of the dangers of nominating an extreme candidate without proper Senate consultation," he said. "They completely neglected to quote my unequivocal bottom line, so let me set the record straight as they say: I said and I quote 'if the president consults and cooperates with the Senate or moderates his selections, then his nominees may enjoy my support as did Justice Kennedy and Justice Souter,' end of quote."
They act like he magically ends his presidency in November. The reality is late January, should he not be reelected, which we all know he will be. Obama was underming him until his last days. Absolutely no reason to stall, I could see a case if it was January 15th and she died.
The Dems are so obviously trying to rig the election via mail-in ballots despite GOP objections then have the audacity to demand the GOP wait on installing a SCOTUS judge. Our President has the tight & duty to nominate a SCOTUS judge ASAP and the GOP senate has the right to vote that judge into SCOTUS.
The left signed up for this because iT wAs hEr TuRn. Also Nuclear Harry Reid. Also Peach Mints, Russia, Kavanaugh, Pussy Grabbin', 4 years of non stop bullshit and now that shit is for real real the left wants to negotiate and talk about how we should have dignity and wait to select.
This is how children below the age of 8 act. They don't stop until they either get their way or they finally get their ass whipped and sent to bed.
As I told my wife, RGB wanted out years ago. She had a whole vision of being replaced by the first female president. The first black president wouldn’t do. She wanted the first female. Then we decided otherwise and she had to spend the last years of her life just trying to to outlast Trump. It’s fucking hilarious if you think about it.
What would be really great is if he nominated a black dude or whatever (I don’t care about their race or sex but I want a constitutionalist at the end of the day) and they do their normal democrat fuckery and put their racism on display right before election time. Disappoint their base. Yum.
I find it satisfying that the Narcoleptic Pedo has no distinguishing title. After nearly a half century of being “Senator Biden” or”Vice President Biden,” he’s just “Mr.”
Shit. I know shit's bad right now, with all that Corona™ bullshit, and the Antifa Arrests, and we are running out of Supreme Court Justices and burrito coverings.
So, yesterday was my birthday. I received President Trump cards and gifts from my loved ones in the morning. I asked them to clear the schedule for the evening so we could watch the great rally. Our wonderful President said his rally was a peaceful protest against stupidity. Almost immediately after, the chryon said RBG had died. Best Birthday Ever.....
No comments on a stickies post???! ITS FREE REAL ESTATE!!
BILL CLINTON IS A RAPIST - INFOWARS.COM
Orange man bad! Cop and Feel 2020!
Pedos 4 Biden 2020
This is really wrong in all kinds of ways. Please dont spread wrong ideas here.
Its Pedos 4 Kamala.
Thats why Biden went for Kamala
yes get it right. Biden doesn't know what is going on. if its day or night. RBG i bet she could not talk for at least a week. coma. so i doubt she said anything. and yes my typing sucks
You're actually right and I apologize. I was misinformed. If Biden wins, though, would be he King Pedo?
As the Lord Lives, We must praise him for these Good turns of Events. Praise the Father God in Jesus Name. Amen!!!
Praise GOD!
Cop a feel, man!
JOE BIDEN IS A RAPIST
HOE BIDIN
Hoe/Biden 2020
And he likes it!
LOOK, FAT
FRIKN FROGS GAY!!!
yeth
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvf6gz58xnI
Harris is the Candidate!
Kamala Harris is a rapist.
Best part is this pulls cum-all-over Harris off the campaign trail for this vote.
The less they see of her the less they hate her.
Every time she doesn’t have an answer for something (which is every time) she just cackles like the drunk slut at a party. That’s all the Dems have, is Kamala the cackling slut, and Joe the stale nut. Best strategy, is to hide both of them.
Man, I fucking forreal think some Pedes got into high levels of the Democrat party, just to push Kamala and Biden as viable candidates. Because I legit can not believe the left thinks they're fucking going to landslide lol.
Same delusion they had in 2016, "if we assume all the swing states go blue then the blues win by a landslide". Before it was "they voted blue before so we think they will again" now its "Trumps mishandling of the coronavirus means that literally everyone will vote blue so if Trump wins it means he cheated democracy"
Man. Honestly, If Trump doesn't win by 300 electoral point landslide, I'd call that election interference lol.
I'll take 270 just to hear the REEEEEE! lol
I guess it's like that Eddie Murphy movie (Distinguished Gentleman; great movie btw). They want people to 'Vote for the name you know'. They probably were the two biggest names on the Dem ticket this year.
Thia can be the only explanation.
I mean with literally millions of unrequested, unverified "vote by mail" ballots without postmarks just floating around out there that were sent to dead people, pets, etc what's to stop them from being targeted by tech algorithms and people harvesting them after Nov. 3rd? All you need is a teeny tiny fraction of the millions to make a landslide either way. A couple hundred here in this close district, a couple hundred there in that swing district. Boom, I just illegitimately forced my candidate of choice into the presidency using "legitimate" ballots.
Yeah that's fair. That's why gotta ram our Supreme court nominee into the Supreme court to prevent that lol.
When does their sex tape drop?
IT WAS A DEBATE
Kamala is pseudo-black Hillary, change my mind.
Obama was a pseudo-black President
Yup, that's a nervous response..
Yeah, lol. I guess she can either say “duh” and let drool fall off her chin, or she can bust her best laugh, and try to fool the NPC’s into thinking something charming and whimsical is happening.
Its a great time to pull up clips of her harassing Kavanaugh and make ads about it.
She's going to pull the "its disrespectful to try to replace her" card and we should all respond "since when have you cared about respect for the Supreme Court?"
Or any court... Or any position she's ever held.
Blew her way to the top, joked about how much weed she used to smoke when she put black people away for half their lives for doing the same.
IT WAS A DEBATE!! *evil cackle*
This seems to be a constant motif with Dem candidates.
He has advanced dimentia, she has Hilary disorder.
Next she'll be coughing up lozenges at the debate.
Jeeze Louise
Nah every time she opens her mouth more people get red pilled.
Sunlight is the best cure for cancer.
They'll be seeing her running her mouth in the Senate, putting her disgusting behavior during the Kavanaugh shitshow to shame.
I'm on board for that
They’ll see her run her mouth at the senate.
Ah. Good point.
It was so obvious the whole time! Why didn't we see it? 😂
Can't get any sun on your head cancer when its shoved firmly up your ass.
Love it, another dose of her lunacy front and center and throws a wrench in her campaign.
It’s a twofer!
She is The Candidate, it's not Hiden.
Yep! She’s gotta get busy interviewing scriptwriters and actors for the upcoming allegations play. The life of an Executive Hoax Producer is very demanding!
Yep.
It's a four year term for the President.
Not three. Not three and a half. Not three and three quarters.
Safely get fucked, including all you milquetoast cuckbeard Reddit refugees.
And Binders Mitt's face is on the box
It stays soft, spongy, and soggy even without milk! But it hardens up every 5 1/2 years.
Absolutely.
Four years isn’t a long term by any means and President Trump hasn’t been permitted anything like a real four year term. Fighting off multiple coups and monstrously bigoted media has hugely diluted what he would have achieved unimpeded.
Despite all that he’s accomplished so much more than the globalists ever wanted to.
Ummm...Merrick Garland ring a bell? I'm all for our team winning, but lets not forget the past of "its just politics"
Yeah, well McConnell was pretty steamed with the whole incident with Reid and "The Nuclear Option" and since Dems wanted to play politics instead of being fair McConnel played politics too. And he was better.
So? McConnell played politics last time and won.
The Senate has to vote on the SCOTUS for a reason, and it’s to provide checks and balances. If Obama had done a better job the Senate would have been Democratic and he would have been able to push through his nominee.
But he did a poor job and the Senate was Republican....pretty sure House might have been too.
The argument at the time was that a supreme court justice could not be confirmed during an election year. We are in the same situation here. What arguments do we have against being hypocrites?
*when the opposing party controls the Senate
Hypocrisy? The Democrats changed the game in 2013 under Harry Reid. I remember when Bill Frist floated the nuclear option way back in 2003 or 2004 and the Left went nuts. They changed the rules, constantly shit on our history/traditions but now want to invoke some rule that is not actually a law? Gentleman's agreements only exist if both sides are Gentlemen.
President Trump has a duty to nominate a Supreme Court Justice. The Senate has a duty to vote on those nominees. As President Obama once said, "elections have consequences."
As mentioned below, the logic behind the rule is that the people vote specifically because of the supreme court. If there is a mismatch between president and senate in terms of not knowing what the political desire of the majority is, then you wait for the next election to see.
Eg. If the senate had flipped to democrats in 2018, you would wait to see if trump was rejected in 2020 by the voters too. But the republicans kept control of the senate, so there is no conflict.
Similarly, in the previous case, it was a democrat president but the senate had flipped to republican. So they waited to see the results in 2016. The people rejected the democrats.
I would like to see them ratify new amendments that puts in term limits for senators and congress, as well as upper bound age limits for all elected federal government roles. If you were to turn 80 or above while in office, you do not qualify
None! I don’t disagree at all, it’s completely hypocritical.
But that’s politics and McConnell played the game properly. Those are the rules.
It would suck with the boot on the other foot, but I would expect nothing less from the opposite side.
Hrm. So you'd be fine with the Dems packing the courts if (big if) they win both senate and presidency and also control the house? because that's politics and they played the game properly?
Okay with it? Yes. Happy? No.
But those are the rules and this how the game is played.
Did Obama wait to nominate someone after Scalia died? No. And I don’t think he should have waited. If they had a Dem senate at the time I wouldn’t have blamed them at all for getting someone in the seat. But America didn’t like the direction he was taking us in and in 2014, 2016 and 2018 the Senate has been a Republican majority.
If America doesn’t like how their states are being run then they can vote the other way and power will shift back. Our system isn’t perfection but it’s pretty damn good and kind of a beautiful thing to watch, even when it’s not in the favor I’d like to see it go.
That's fair.
Nobody cares, Captain Cuckbeard.
Slither back to your pathetic greasehole and do not speak unless spoken to.
There are some cultures better than others. In my culture we believe in equality of opportunity, in competence-based hierarchies, in the right to life, in the freedom of women.
Gangster Culture and Islamism are the cancer of the world
"There are some cultures better than others."
That's God's truth right there.
It's also the root of the problem that the BLoMe movement is supposedly trying to fix. Hip Hop Rap culture has bred a throng of lawless losers who hate the police and law and order.
Actually a throng of lawless losers who hate police bred Hip Hop/ Rap Culture.
Eh, I'd say a group of people with a higher IQ than average purposefully promoted thug culture of rap and hip hop.
But art is, like, art, man. Who can deny the intricate introspection and commentary of such works as Juvenile's Back That Azz Up or Akinyele's Put It In Your Mouth? Don't be racist.
(((A group of people)))
Those darn higher IQ people and their promotion of degeneracy. Literally never ends. Look at the famous "melting pot" catchphrase and realize it came from a playwright named Israel
the slave trade was a Trojan Horse.
Cardi B's WAP is a fine example of classical myxolodian melodies using the sonata format to convey deep personal thoughts on Cardi B's vagina.
I've heard it's exquisite. I fear my intellectual levels will fail me in trying to understand a certified masterpiece, so I am putting off my indulgence in Cardi B's genius use of metaphors and symbolism.
I'm reminded of one day when I was in my study, leaning over an oaken desk, pondering the meaning of Tupac's Rather Be Your N.I.G.G.A, in particular the part where he boldly exclaims, "so we can get drunk and smoke weed all day". Is he making a statement on existence and the existential feeling of aging? Or is he perhaps diagnosing the biggest obstacles to world peace and harmony? Our prophets, I mean rappers, have left us with so many important questions to ponder and debate.
also true
I see, it's a chicken / egg kind of thing.
Yes. It's a culture is downstream from genetics thing.
Debatable though, some early hip hop artists wanted to about big ol butts and others wanted to rap about being fat/eating all the time. It was more about the beat than fucking any police
They held off announcing Ruthies death until now. Its the one thing they figure will fire up their base to vote for Biden than for no other reason.
I’m thinking this as well.
u leave anime out of this my anime pillow wears a maga hat uwu
Make anime great again?
This.
Won't some lovely MAGA lady kiss this poor gentleman for once?!
3DPD
Based AF.
But it would be great to have the SCOTUS with a 5-4 conservative majority, if Trump's nominee passes.
The SCOTUS might be involved in deciding the elections, so we need a conservative majority there asap
Does Roberts have to die to get a new Chief Justice? Cause he has really been fucking shit up for us. Would have been better off with RGB as CJOTS cause the rulings would have been the same and she'd be dead.
He should be impeached and removed from office. The dirt on him is good enough
Biden’s selfish and reckless and does not give a shit about you and me. A bad guy!
Because one of the few things he does know, aside from how to read from a teleprompter, is that nothing he does is going to matter to him in a few months or so.
It's a false equivalence to compare this to Scalia's replacement. They like to ignore that when Mitch McConnell said we should wait to select a new supreme court justice under Obama we were near the end of Obama's second term. There was going to be a "new" president either way when Obama's time was up.
Exactly. It would be like a Democrat senate majority refusing to approve Trump's nominee. Which obviously they'd refuse regardless.
Biden's OWN proposal put forth that Justices shouldn't be nominated when the President and Senate aren't politically aligned. Per his own beliefs, we'd need to nominate someone right now. (Seems like being a career politician has fucked him yet again.)
Then you have issues like if it's a contested election and we risk a 4-4 vote. (Which has happened fairly recently - Bush v. Gore - and can very likely happen again given how Michigan and Pennsylvania Democrats are actively trying to steal their votes with their bullshit counting rulings.)
You also have Ginsburg's own comments regarding Garland and her saying "The President is President for four years", meaning Trump still has the complete right - even in her own view - to nominate.
Trump and Obama's situations are also different as Obama was on his last term and without question we'd have a new president while Trump is only finishing his first term.
And, what I find especially most delicious of all of this, the Democrats have already decided that ceremony, mutual respect, and tradition went out the door LONG AGO when they politicized impeachment proceedings (because "orange man bad") trying to sway midterm elections. They have NEVER - not once - granted any form of respect or kindness to our side (from the very clearly partisan impeachment to the Kavanaugh debacle, both being utter lows for our nation). So fuck 'em. What goes around comes around. I want him to select a justice that will make Thomas look liberal and I want that justice on their for decades.
Start the process IMMEDIATELY. Let the left destroy what little chance they had to win by rioting even more.
Let’s make this old news by the time Election Day comes around
This was the best comment I read on r/politics while mining for salt last night:
“We’ve all been saying that this coming election will be the most important election of our lives, but it turns out that election already happened. The most important election of our lives was 2016 and it’s over.”
Haha Americans go brrrrrr
Haha POTUS go “ Please raise your right hand and repeat after me…“
He isn’t wrong.
Part of me would just love it if it happened after the re-election, because they'd all die of horror. But if they had that carrot in front of them they'd push harder to cheat, get someone on the bench now that won't uphold their election shenanigans when the fight inevitably ends up in the S.C. before January 21st.
She probably died at the 10th hour, but they couldn’t hide it any longer.
You know they will install a full on commie as soon as they get the chance. The Constitution is clear - there is no reason to do anything other than affirm and swear in President Trump’s nominee. The democrats riot, burn and loot no matter what we do, and this is why we voted for him, and the senate it the first place. #DoYourJob
That’s why I voted for the first time like my life depended on it. Anybody with half a brain could see how many Supreme Court justices were going to be picked. And we could not let that corrupt woman pick them. Now since taking the redpill it’s quite apparent the whole Dem party is corrupt.
Exactly this. Anyone with eyes could see. People always think SCOTUS is along party lines, but really you are choosing between activists who will derail our society based on the Zeitgeist OR preservationists that respect our Constitution and recognize that our society has lasted this long because of our Constitution.
this is the ULTIMATE fuck you to the left! trump god dammit. DO NOT PLAY BY THE RULES!! mitch! do NOT play by the rules! the leftist democrat shitlords WOULD NOT DO THE SAME!!
RAM IT THROUGH!! ram the fucking judge through NOW. fuck the left. give them a knockout punch then a killing blow on nov 3rd.
I might get downvoted here but I think this is the time for Republicans/conservatives to extend an olive branch to the left. Tell them, "you're right, we will hold off on the pick" and make them always remember that we are the ones with principles. America will have the chance to vote on the Supreme Court pick on November 3rd. Maybe by us doing this, we can pull back the extremes from both sides and work together towards making America great for everyone, with less vitriol.
....said some cuck loser who hasn't been paying attention. Mr. McConnell, jam that pick down their throats and take pleasure in it! Eat a dick, lefties!!
I actually started feeling ill pretending to be a cuckservative.
Got me lmao
Damn right we did
Bad day for illegals, welfare cheats and frauds. Good day for future law abiding citizens.
One only needs to ask yourself. Would the Democrats do this if in the same position? Would they have done that in 2016 too if they controlled the senate and a Republican was in office? I think we all know the answer to that.
Do we have the votes? They're so many cuckseratives in congress.
Romney is fucking garbage so he'll be a no. There's the 2 squishy girl GOPS that may go no based on past comments. Toomey who knows. 50 is still good enough with Pence standing by, right?
My fear is that with a tiny nominal majority Trump will be forced to pick a moderately conservative one, instead of a proper bases judge.
It's a simple, long-precedented thing. If the American people choose to give the senate to the opposite party from the President, then the American people are choosing not to let that President fill a seat in an election year. The senate thus acting as a check on the President. If the American people choose to give the senate to the same party as the President, then the American people are granting that President their permission to fill seats right up to the day he leaves office.
But REEEEE
The guy you're replying to is correct. Republican Senate leaders declared that because Scalia's seat had become vacant during an election year, the Senate would not even consider a nomination from the president.
It was the end of Barry's second term and we were guaranteed to get a new president
And they owned the Senate.
Why does everyone leave out this distinction?
Exactly if the democrats wanted their pick of SCJ, then they should have won the senate. “Elections have consequences”
I know. People keep derailing the discussion. I was just letting you know that the guy was right, in that the republican senators who said they would never appoint a SCJ during an election year were technically hypocrites (per definition). And there's nothing wrong with that, what's best for the America comes first!
Split President and Senate. Republicans control the senate and presidency. The Biden rule was just for when they are different parties. It would be fucking retarded not to confirm when the Senate and President are the same party.
While I do 100% agree with you in that he should appoint a new Judge, it is definitely hypocritical. Republican Senate leaders declared that because Scalia's seat had become vacant during an election year, the Senate would not even consider a nomination from the president.
If anything, that makes this so much more juicy. I can't wait to see their reaction!
That definitely wasnt the conclusion the Senate came to back in 2016. You are just misleading people. The Senate was under no compulsion to approve Obama's nomination, because they werent from the same party. If it was a democrat Senate you could have bet they would have pushed it through.
How am I misleading? I'm 100% for Trump picking a judge for the vacant seat, I was just letting you know that the guy you were replying to was, in fact, right.
Also, I'm absolutely not implying that Trump is a hypocrite, just the republican senators who said they would not consider a nomination during an election year.
The rationale being they are 2 different parties back then. The Senate is well within its right to not affirm Obama's choice.
Now both the WH and Senate are the same parties.
It doesnt make them hypocrites. They are functioning within their constitutional authority. Thats the whole purpose of Senate affirmation (checks & balances in a multi party (2 party) democracy), otherwise it would just be a rubber stamp approval.
I know. People keep derailing the discussion. I was just letting you know that the guy was right, in that the republican senators who said they would never appoint a SCJ during an election year were technically hypocrites (per definition). And there's nothing wrong with that, what's best for the America comes first!
Cocaine Mitch didn't have to confirm anything because Republicans ran the senate. Obama was a Democrat. Biden rule is for when a different party runs the Senate to justify stopping THE OTHER PARTY from getting a pick near a lame duck election.
There's no logical reason to stop the appointment pick of OUR GUY. There's no precedent for that because it would be fucking suicide politically.
Dude, I'm agreeing with you, he should pick it. I was just letting you know that the guy you replied to was correct. Multiple republican senators claimed they wouldn't consider a replacement during an election year.
It's not hypocritical at all.
The guy you're replying to is correct. Republican Senate leaders declared that because Scalia's seat had become vacant during an election year, the Senate would not even consider a nomination from the president.
When the Senate and President are different parties, and the president is finishing his second term.
Nice new account. Weird. 5 minutes old.
No, the Senate didnt consider it because the Senate and the WH were not the same parties. The Senate specifically mentioned it was under no compulsion to approve a Justice nominated by a sitting lame duck president.
Now the Senate and WH are the same parties.
Its not really hypocrisy at all. Senate has complete authority to not affirm the President's nomination if it feels so. This is the power provided to the Senate by the Constitution. When the President and Senate are from opposing parties, there is no compulsion on the Senate to do so.
Now WH and Senate are the same parties.
Ratios of 2016 and 2020 are completely different.
There's two facts they left out. One, not only did we have an election in 2016, nomination of SCOTUS justices was a key campaign issue. It was one of the primary issues that got people out to vote. WE VOTED! Now we need our votes to count!
Two, Ginsburg made her choices, not just personally, but as a SCOTUS judge. Those decisions should be just as final and consequential as any other decision she made as a justice. She could have retired during Obama's term to ensure that the Democrats got to nominate her replacement. We don't know why she did that. Maybe she was making deals with the Clintons, and rested on the assurance that Hillary was going to win. Who knows. She made a decision to extend her term into Trump's presidency. Then she decided to hold on to her position well beyond reason for her age and health clearly trying to out last Trump's presidency. She voted on key issues that should have been made by a Trump replacement. Now, she didn't make it. Voters have had to put up with her unconstitutional rulings for four more years. Enough is enough. She's dead, and Trump is our president. Every Republican in the House and Senate need to pull every favor, use every leverage, make every threat, to get every vote needed to get this job done. We need to throw out every Republican in the House or Senate if they don't get this done by the end of Trump's term.
That's the President I voted for!
Take it, bitches.
Joe even said so! Its only to be delayed when the Senate is in Opposition to the President!
THE BIDEN RULE 1992
JOE BIDEN REFUTING THE BIDEN RULE 2016
Truth Grater Jinxburg replaced by a republican would make the SCOTUS score 6-3 for republicans.
Right now we need at least 1 more strong pro 2a vote. They wont take 2a cases because there isnt 5 votes.
It isnt enough to have the R next to their name
They’re turning the frogs gay! Also Corn Pop was one bad dude!
Biden coming with the chains, blonde leg hair blowing in the wind. After that he rode off on his Harley and was never seen again.
Suck it. Elections have consequences.
They act like he magically ends his presidency in November. The reality is late January, should he not be reelected, which we all know he will be. Obama was underming him until his last days. Absolutely no reason to stall, I could see a case if it was January 15th and she died.
The Dems are so obviously trying to rig the election via mail-in ballots despite GOP objections then have the audacity to demand the GOP wait on installing a SCOTUS judge. Our President has the tight & duty to nominate a SCOTUS judge ASAP and the GOP senate has the right to vote that judge into SCOTUS.
https://youtu.be/wYa2rw4cY8w
Joe Biden sniffs children and women, his VP pick practices modern day slavery. The left everyone...
The left signed up for this because iT wAs hEr TuRn. Also Nuclear Harry Reid. Also Peach Mints, Russia, Kavanaugh, Pussy Grabbin', 4 years of non stop bullshit and now that shit is for real real the left wants to negotiate and talk about how we should have dignity and wait to select.
This is how children below the age of 8 act. They don't stop until they either get their way or they finally get their ass whipped and sent to bed.
Biden is a racist pedo rapist!!!
As I told my wife, RGB wanted out years ago. She had a whole vision of being replaced by the first female president. The first black president wouldn’t do. She wanted the first female. Then we decided otherwise and she had to spend the last years of her life just trying to to outlast Trump. It’s fucking hilarious if you think about it.
What would be really great is if he nominated a black dude or whatever (I don’t care about their race or sex but I want a constitutionalist at the end of the day) and they do their normal democrat fuckery and put their racism on display right before election time. Disappoint their base. Yum.
Nope, its Amy Barrett's turn. Lets see Mr. BlasseyFord show up and accuse her of gangbanging him.
They'll do it anyway, you stop being black if you aren't a Democrat.
I find it satisfying that the Narcoleptic Pedo has no distinguishing title. After nearly a half century of being “Senator Biden” or”Vice President Biden,” he’s just “Mr.”
The voters picked who should confirm the pick too.
No. Never apologize for winning.
I say Joe should have a debate set up before the SC nomination!! He wouldn't show up but it would be great bait.
Shit. I know shit's bad right now, with all that Corona™ bullshit, and the Antifa Arrests, and we are running out of Supreme Court Justices and burrito coverings.
I'd be shocked if anyone wants to be a Supreme Court Nominee ever again after the way they treated Kavanaugh
Have a nice nap. Ha!
Rent free in their heads
Hey Harris Campaign, it's SCIENCE.
So, yesterday was my birthday. I received President Trump cards and gifts from my loved ones in the morning. I asked them to clear the schedule for the evening so we could watch the great rally. Our wonderful President said his rally was a peaceful protest against stupidity. Almost immediately after, the chryon said RBG had died. Best Birthday Ever.....
We need a MAGA rally at her funeral.
Lol. Mr. That’s no mistake.