Pedes, As you may be aware, the Supreme Court hasn't met in person since March. All deliberations have been done by telephone. It's been speculated by many on here for some time that the dems might be either covering up or would cover up RBG's death if it were to happen before re-election. I believe there is evidence of this and it centers around the RBG wedding officiating story that came out at the end of last month (widely reported by the msm). Strangely there's only one picture from this wedding. Even more strange is the fact that the only source for the wedding even happening is the Bride's own twitter account (now hidden). Yet this was reported across THOUSANDS of articles that day like it was purposefully promoted and marketed. The evidence listed below seems to suggest that the wedding was a complete fabrication. If so, then the question is why? Why would democrat campaign managers be faking their wedding and saying RBG attended when she did not? Perhaps the dead body of a supreme court justice and the complete subversion of our political system (ie treason?). We need to dig on this and figure out whats going on here. I've split the relevant info into two parts below (timeline and info).
Timeline
08/31:
Hundreds of articles are pushed into the mainstream citing RBG officiating a wedding. This was somewhat shocking for some to hear considering it was reported earlier in August that she was undergoing chemo treatments. No address (not even a state) was listed for the wedding. LINK
09/09:
Trump tweets that he is going to announce a list of potential Supreme Court Nominations (perhaps a signal to the dems that he knows?) LINK
09/18:
It is officially announced that RBG has died. Trump was apparently(?) not made aware of this and was actually informed of the news by a reporter. Which is an odd occurrence considering the importance of that information.
Info
•The bride (Barb Solish) and the groom (Danny Kazin) both manage(d?) political campaigns for the DCCC. Just search their names and "DCCC" on any search engine. These two have some very heavy handed political connects.
•Barb Solish has set her twitter account to private since RBG's supposed death. However the post regarding the wedding has been archived. LINK
•Wedding registries online show that their wedding isn't until May 29, 2021. They've since deleted/hidden that registry but it is also archived. LINK
•Other Links
They would have kept her death covered up until after the election.
That's why Trump's tweet is important. IMO, If Trump knew what was going on, they wouldn't be able to put it off any longer since he would no doubt call them out on it as an October surprise. Trump now gets his supreme court appointment which might be extremely necessary if the election has to be decided by the supreme court due to voting issues/fraud.
I would think that having RBG alive would have been to their advantage - wouldn't it?
Or maybe Crazy Nancy decided that stealing the election is paramount now?
Look at it this way:
RBG is alive, at least Trump can't name a new justice before the election - but the election still has to be stolen and it's not going entirely well. People are wising up to their tactics, the riots are dying down, and the forest fires are harder to start because ranchers out there are shooting at Antifa.
RBG is dead, Trump will try to name a new justice - and that immediately ramps up the riots and chaos by a factor of 10 which can only help the Dems steal the election.
Maybe they decided to go for "more chaos to make it easier to steal the election." One story says that it was Nancy who called off the "siege of the White House" that was supposed to start 9/17 but got cancelled. RBG's death was announced the very next day.
If they could have perhaps. And what of the lack of mask? It would seem that the left MSM would not promote such a thing because it would benefit Donald's stance at the time. And, sans mask rreadily shows Ginsberg's whole face, which would be critical to "prove identity".
If it comes out that they covered up her death by even a day, let alone weeks, it will literally be the death of the democrat party.
yeah, I might think that lying to the American people about a Supreme Court Justice being dead or incapacitated might be seditious?
Itd be one hell of a redpill for normies, thats for sure. The radicalized leftists would think its perfectly fine and acceptable though. Media would probably act the same.
Should be a marriage license somewhere...
The bride's dress was so ugly I hope it was a fake wedding.
Seriously, though, it would not surprise me at all to learn that RBG has been dead for quite a while. The only question is, why announce it yesterday? What's the significance of ##45## days before the election?
They probably thought they could keep up the act until after the election which serves 2 purposes.
If im correct about Trumps tweet on the 9th, they may have decided the plan was too risky from a legal standpoint and scrapped it. However this is all conjecture so its really anyones guess.
With Chief Justice John Roberts knowledge.
I believe she died sometime between April and August. It's either they realized that Trump found out or they timed it to try to help energize the base. I would think that they would have tried to hold off announcing her death a few more weeks if they could have. Maybe their hand was forced?