Thapar rejected a claim of workplace harassment by an employee who had been repeatedly groped and verbally harassed, because Thapar believed there was no “credible evidence that the harasser was homosexual.”
Another suppression case in which Thapar sat by designation on the 6th Circuit, United States v. Frechette, ended with a Thapar decision holding that suppression of evidence obtained via a search warrant in a child-pornography case was not required.
TELL POTUS: "AMUL THAPAR IS THE BEST PICK FOR SCOTUS"
LEFTIES HATE AMUL THAPAR
PEDOPHILES HATE AMUL THAPAR
AMUL THAPAR STANDS UP FOR THE RIGHTS OF THE UNBORN