You know what's Christian? The bible says a woman should be at home, and never be in a position of authority over a man. If she was a bible believing Christian, she wouldn't be a judge, she would be at home, schooling her children like God said to do.
Do you read the bible? I can give you probably ten more scriptures where God says women should be in obedience to their husband in all things. If the bible says to be in obedience to your husband, and that they should "marry, bear children, and guide the house" then how in the world should they be in authority positions in the world.
There are specific gender rolls in the church and in marriage, but there are women leaders in the bible (Deborah, Miriam for example). Not everyone is called to be married and have kids (Paul addresses this). I dont think a blanket statement that women shouldnt have any positions of power in the world is loving or how Jesus would think. But thats my opinion.
That is exactly how Jesus would think. The bible commands women to keep silence in the church. It says that Gods curse is on wicked nations, and will have women and children rule over them. It also says that a woman should not usurp authority over a man. Women have a place in church, it's being quiet during the service. But women do have an important rule in the function of the church, which is to go soul winning and preach the Gospel to people. But they shouldn't talk in church. They shouldnt even say Amen while the pastor is preaching. Jesus Christ is the Word, made flesh. So anything in the bible that is a direct statement or command, Jesus would agree with.
That quote alone tells you she'll flip when the pressure is put on. There are put on the Court by political Presidents for a reason. To act like the Supreme Court isn't political is the best joke of 2020 so far.
Can't upvote because I know nothing about her. And after years of people promoting ACB, I'm now really confused. Its like over night we suddenly don't like her.
Anti abortion social con's tend to be very non analytical. All you have to do to win them over is stump against abortion, and they give their full support like a no differently then your average 3rd wave feminist does for pro abortion stomping candidates.
Iow, they need help to see when they are being played. Jusy the way it is. Good hearts, but... Posts like OP here are perfect for that.
There is a serious astro turf campaign against ACB right now, it's fucking weird and started immediately after RBG's death. She's written papers about not giving a fuck about precedent if the past rulings were anti-constitutional and she's very pro life, roe v wade is NOT safe with ACB and the left does not want to see her on the SCOTUS.
Why do you think "ACB is a single-issue justice. she will completely stab the POTUS in the back if the election gets challenged." This seems completely imaginary.
"In 2016, while in the Florida Third District Court of Appeal, she wrote an opinion reversing the conviction of Adonis Losada, a former Univision comic actor sentenced to 153 years in prison for collecting child porn. "
I want her to be the pick because of her personal experience with communism. She knows first hand what we are fighting against and how important it is.
She is weak on 2A. supported lockdowns. Her opinion said that governors have the ability to curtail 1st amendment rights. And she literally said her “technique” for being impartial is imagining the opposing party in the argument was her child. She’s Fucking retarded.
Neither felons nor the mentally ill are categorically excluded from our national community. That does not mean that the government cannot prevent them from possessing guns. Instead, it means that the question is whether the government has the power to disable the exercise of a right that they otherwise possess, rather than whether they possess the right at all.
historical evidence does, however, support a different proposition: that the legislature may disarm those who have demonstrated a proclivity for violence or whose possession of guns would otherwise threaten the public safety. This is a category simultaneously broader and narrower than “felons”—it includes dangerous people who have not been convicted of felonies but not felons lacking indicia of dangerousness.
Oof! This is a non-starter for me. This is why we need men on the court. Women base too much on their personal feelings with their thought process. It's just a fact.
That sounded really stupid, yes. It sounds like she's appealing to liberals that worry her bias against criminals will color her judgement, and so she picks the most biased example (one's children) to judge it.
It would be better just to argue for dispassionate interpretation of the law, but audiences want to be entertained, feel their virtue stroked.
I admit, I feel less bad about her dumb example after hearing it, but it's still stupid. You pick the people you would be the most biased for (your kids) to be unbiased? Yeah.
Well that's true. Up until the last half century this notion of "living constitution" never existed. Its a leftist dogma. Now the right procures originalism and the left changes the rules as they see fit. There shouldn't be a difference is what she argued: judges should determine the law as it is written
My only concern would be if she might be more susceptible to the inevitable persuasions the left will thrust upon her to support notions like my body my choice, or to try to draw sympathy to support illegal immigration under the "dreamers" misdirection. Justice roberts has proven himself to be a traitor to his stated ideals, a very bad pick, and anyone can be turned if the price is right or bribed with dirt ala Lisa Murkowski, so she would need to be emotionally and morally bulletproof to wothstand the inevitable. Ill have to look more into her history.
I want the best man for the job, not identity politics. Either one will kill any immigration rulings. But, if I had to pick between the weaker propects, I'd go with Lagoa.
Anyone here actually still man enough to say that women should not be in ANY political leadership position? I will never vote for a woman as a judge, senator, representative, not even as a dog catcher. Women should be in the house raising children and guiding the home. Bunch of virtue signaling cucks.
Trump should nominate a MAN. Women should not be in authority over men. Ever. God said "I suffer not a woman to usurp authority over the man."
Modern men are internally exceptionally weak and refuse to do their jobs by leading and governing society instead continually abdicating their authority to women.
RGB dies, gets replaced with a women, nothing changes. This is not winning.
However, I don't think women would make good presidents. Unless you can get Margaret Thatcher.
You need someone who can go toe to toe with other alpha males if you're president.
Women can make great governors, senators, etc.
And by the way, congress members are NOT our leaders. They are our representatives. They are supposed to write the legislation WE WANT. They are our employees.
They have become uppity in recent years and need a good backhand.
Thanks. She’s of my list. As a former Catholic, I wasn’t holding her Religion against her. I was willing to give her the benefit of the doubt. But, she is not who we want or need.
a 1998 article published in the Marquette Law Review that Barrett had written offering a very thoughtful analysis of the considerations Catholic jurists would run into regarding issues like euthanasia, abortion, and the death penalty. Barrett said during the confirmation hearings that were she to be a trial judge she couldn’t see herself entering an order of execution, but that as a clerk for Scalia at the Supreme Court she had advised the Justice on capital cases and would be bound by the Constitution rather than Catholic teaching on matters of the law.
So she wrote an article where she outlined, in theory, how a Catholic jurist might recuse themselves when dogma and law are in conflict but in practice she clerked for a sitting Supreme Court Jurist on the very same types of cases, did not recuse herself, and upheld the Constitution as the guiding advisory principle.
Edit: BTW, for those interested, insofar as the Catholic teaching on capital punishment goes, it has not changed. Nor can it.. Relatively recent statements by bishops and the Pope on the death penalty are prudential judgements. Basically, opinions on the exercise of capital punishment.
That's really all we needed to know.
Who represents Latinas now, Sotomayor?
Anyone with a D next to their name.
You know what's Christian? The bible says a woman should be at home, and never be in a position of authority over a man. If she was a bible believing Christian, she wouldn't be a judge, she would be at home, schooling her children like God said to do.
Thats not what it says. That is referring to in the church only. Please dont misquote to fit your agenda.
Actually Apostle Paul did day those things. But right now it doesn't matter anyway.
Do you read the bible? I can give you probably ten more scriptures where God says women should be in obedience to their husband in all things. If the bible says to be in obedience to your husband, and that they should "marry, bear children, and guide the house" then how in the world should they be in authority positions in the world.
There are specific gender rolls in the church and in marriage, but there are women leaders in the bible (Deborah, Miriam for example). Not everyone is called to be married and have kids (Paul addresses this). I dont think a blanket statement that women shouldnt have any positions of power in the world is loving or how Jesus would think. But thats my opinion.
That is exactly how Jesus would think. The bible commands women to keep silence in the church. It says that Gods curse is on wicked nations, and will have women and children rule over them. It also says that a woman should not usurp authority over a man. Women have a place in church, it's being quiet during the service. But women do have an important rule in the function of the church, which is to go soul winning and preach the Gospel to people. But they shouldn't talk in church. They shouldnt even say Amen while the pastor is preaching. Jesus Christ is the Word, made flesh. So anything in the bible that is a direct statement or command, Jesus would agree with.
our discussion was not about womans function in a church but if its acceptable for woman to have other roles of leadership.
🙄 RBG? Is that you?
Sauce
I just want to see the liberal heads explode when they get told to (paid to) go out and protest against a "Woman Of Color" nominee.
That is the good part for sure.
ACB is a snake and has no backbone. If she can’t make good decisions when she isn’t a USSC; she won’t make them when she is
I don't know much about her but she seems pretty based.
it's called being gracious dude. the clip is literally less than 5 seconds.
Well, that's all I need to know. SWAMP RINO
I'd rather a straight, christian white male with the same convictions just to extend the salt mining operations.
Might be time for a mix up. Id rather a based immigrant, it would be glorious how much salt would flow as we throw identity politics up their asses.
"Theodora Cruz" is the correct SCOTUS chick pick
If we have to have a chick, I want Allison Jones Rushing.
That quote alone tells you she'll flip when the pressure is put on. There are put on the Court by political Presidents for a reason. To act like the Supreme Court isn't political is the best joke of 2020 so far.
Can't upvote because I know nothing about her. And after years of people promoting ACB, I'm now really confused. Its like over night we suddenly don't like her.
Anti abortion social con's tend to be very non analytical. All you have to do to win them over is stump against abortion, and they give their full support like a no differently then your average 3rd wave feminist does for pro abortion stomping candidates.
Iow, they need help to see when they are being played. Jusy the way it is. Good hearts, but... Posts like OP here are perfect for that.
She was on the team representing Elian Gonzalez’s American family in 2000.
If this doesn’t show she’s the right person for the job, idk what will.
Will she vote to repeal the NFA? We need a staunch constitutionalist on the court
We could just win and repeal it too.
There is a serious astro turf campaign against ACB right now, it's fucking weird and started immediately after RBG's death. She's written papers about not giving a fuck about precedent if the past rulings were anti-constitutional and she's very pro life, roe v wade is NOT safe with ACB and the left does not want to see her on the SCOTUS.
We have disagreed before, but not on this. Lagoa is ride or die
Yeah, because I want the Peter Strzok's and Comey's of the world to have the power of life and death over me.
If you're exonerated later you can be freed.
Why?
Because it's gay.
Mexico sucks.
I’d love a based commie hater on the bench.
Can't we just reanimated Scalia with whatever they were using on Ginsburg for the last 5 years?
God bless him
I wish. RIP
She seems fine, but her husband donates to Rubio, and her father-in-law is literally a "Bill Clinton Judge" appointed in 2000. She's a Bush Judge.
Clinton-Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton-Bush.
Trump will probably pick her though.
Logoa is a Jeb Bush judge. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PZCrIhm0dB8&t=844
Why do you think "ACB is a single-issue justice. she will completely stab the POTUS in the back if the election gets challenged." This seems completely imaginary.
He CAN'T appoint another establishment goon. He needs to stop taking advice on appointments
How would he know who to appoint then?
And then there's this:
"In 2016, while in the Florida Third District Court of Appeal, she wrote an opinion reversing the conviction of Adonis Losada, a former Univision comic actor sentenced to 153 years in prison for collecting child porn. "
soo.....
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8751771/Trumps-frontrunners-Supreme-Court-nomination-devout-Catholic-Cuban-American-judge.html
She's got the Latina card to use against their worshipping of identity politics. Alinsky rule #4, make your enemy operate by their own standards.
I want her to be the pick because of her personal experience with communism. She knows first hand what we are fighting against and how important it is.
After reading through all the comments, I'm in for Lagoa! Fuck ACB, she sounds like a trap now.
This is why I love this place! Thanks Pedes!
Can I just identify as a female and be appointed?
I'd print out a copy of the Constitution and read it during legal arguments
"How does that statement apply to the Constitution? Oh, it doesn't? Nay!"
Yes!
Yes.
I honestly have no idea who would be a better scotus.
She would be a fantastic counter to Sotomayor.
Agreed. Whats with all the hate? ACB is a fine justice. Just spent the last few hours reading her opinions on the 7th circuit
http://media.ca7.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/rssExec.pl?Time=any&FromMonth=&FromDay=&FromYear=&ToMonth=&ToDay=&ToYear=&Author=any&AuthorName=barrett&Case=any&CaseY1=&CaseY2=&CaseN1=&CaseN2=&CaseN3=&CaseN4=&Submit=Submit&RssJudgeName=Sykes&OpsOnly=yes
ACB is pro lockdown and wishy washy. She has no backbone, doesn’t deserve the seat. She caved to pro lockdown she’ll cave more
She's a Nikki Haley type. Don't trust her.
Can you provide a source for this? I've been hearing this a lot but trying to search for something yields no results on this.
https://thedonald.win/p/HXfLWQK9/not-a-conservative-just-16-days-/c/
She's not pro lockdown she voted that JB PRICKster (IL gov) couldn't favor certain institutions over others with the lockdown
She allowed BLm to protest and not republicans
Could you site please? Pretty interested in this
https://thedonald.win/p/HXfLWQK9/not-a-conservative-just-16-days-/c/
She is weak on 2A. supported lockdowns. Her opinion said that governors have the ability to curtail 1st amendment rights. And she literally said her “technique” for being impartial is imagining the opposing party in the argument was her child. She’s Fucking retarded.
I'm just not seeing it. Can you point me to an opinion thats concerning?
She voted that nonviolent felons should have the right to gun ownership. A very controversial opinion since LBJ
yeah I know what her dissent was. I have a disagreement with the wording of the rest of her opinion.
Oh. Could you please quote? I mean I'm open to criticism. I'm just seeing all this hate moments after alex Jones condemned her
https://sites.law.duke.edu/secondthoughts/2019/05/29/dangerous-unvirtuous-felons-and-the-scope-of-the-second-amendment/
^^second from the last paragraph
and from dissent
page 27 and 33: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca7/18-1478/18-1478-2019-03-15.html
Thats terrifying you're right
Oof! This is a non-starter for me. This is why we need men on the court. Women base too much on their personal feelings with their thought process. It's just a fact.
you want more evidence, read this --
https://thedonald.win/p/HXjxedvz/sunday-gunday-psa--acb-is-not-pr/
and watch this: 14:30 is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard. https://youtu.be/j0ZN532f9d0
That sounded really stupid, yes. It sounds like she's appealing to liberals that worry her bias against criminals will color her judgement, and so she picks the most biased example (one's children) to judge it.
It would be better just to argue for dispassionate interpretation of the law, but audiences want to be entertained, feel their virtue stroked.
I admit, I feel less bad about her dumb example after hearing it, but it's still stupid. You pick the people you would be the most biased for (your kids) to be unbiased? Yeah.
Little Trayvon Obama.
Well that's true. Up until the last half century this notion of "living constitution" never existed. Its a leftist dogma. Now the right procures originalism and the left changes the rules as they see fit. There shouldn't be a difference is what she argued: judges should determine the law as it is written
Can Amy Coney Barrett defenders point to some cases where she sided with consumers in cases against big business?
If the shills are so against ACB, she must be the right choice
I like your convictions.
Looks like the chick from workaholics.
Lagoa please
ACB = thumbs down
Ew, no. No more goblinas on the bench.
Is she Chinese?
No just fat.
My only concern would be if she might be more susceptible to the inevitable persuasions the left will thrust upon her to support notions like my body my choice, or to try to draw sympathy to support illegal immigration under the "dreamers" misdirection. Justice roberts has proven himself to be a traitor to his stated ideals, a very bad pick, and anyone can be turned if the price is right or bribed with dirt ala Lisa Murkowski, so she would need to be emotionally and morally bulletproof to wothstand the inevitable. Ill have to look more into her history.
I want the best man for the job, not identity politics. Either one will kill any immigration rulings. But, if I had to pick between the weaker propects, I'd go with Lagoa.
The best picture they have of her is with her eyes closed?! Pretty sure she's sides with Robert's on some cases. Hard pass.
Anyone here actually still man enough to say that women should not be in ANY political leadership position? I will never vote for a woman as a judge, senator, representative, not even as a dog catcher. Women should be in the house raising children and guiding the home. Bunch of virtue signaling cucks.
Trump should nominate a MAN. Women should not be in authority over men. Ever. God said "I suffer not a woman to usurp authority over the man."
This I agree with.
Modern men are internally exceptionally weak and refuse to do their jobs by leading and governing society instead continually abdicating their authority to women.
RGB dies, gets replaced with a women, nothing changes. This is not winning.
Go away with your misogynistic views
Reality is mean :(
I'm fine with it if they're a manly woman. Like a lesbian or just really butch. But not progressive either.
Women should do whatever the fuck they want. Not everyone is cut out for kids.
Well...
That's not the world we live in.
This is WAR. And we need all warriors.
However, I don't think women would make good presidents. Unless you can get Margaret Thatcher.
You need someone who can go toe to toe with other alpha males if you're president.
Women can make great governors, senators, etc.
And by the way, congress members are NOT our leaders. They are our representatives. They are supposed to write the legislation WE WANT. They are our employees.
They have become uppity in recent years and need a good backhand.
"Without Governor Jeb Bush, I would not be where I am today" Do you want another John Roberts on the SCOTUS? source: see for yourself
ACB had a 6 year appointment from Roberts. Lagoa has better case history, and also doesn't say retarded shit like this:
https://youtu.be/j0ZN532f9d0?t=877
Guns and immigration are my top two priorities.
She ruled that non violent felons should have the right to gun ownership on 7th circuit. Seems to have a level head with immigration too
Source? If true she loses my support.......if true.
Thanks. She’s of my list. As a former Catholic, I wasn’t holding her Religion against her. I was willing to give her the benefit of the doubt. But, she is not who we want or need.
hmm msn.com
Here's The Spectator
a 1998 article published in the Marquette Law Review that Barrett had written offering a very thoughtful analysis of the considerations Catholic jurists would run into regarding issues like euthanasia, abortion, and the death penalty. Barrett said during the confirmation hearings that were she to be a trial judge she couldn’t see herself entering an order of execution, but that as a clerk for Scalia at the Supreme Court she had advised the Justice on capital cases and would be bound by the Constitution rather than Catholic teaching on matters of the law.
So she wrote an article where she outlined, in theory, how a Catholic jurist might recuse themselves when dogma and law are in conflict but in practice she clerked for a sitting Supreme Court Jurist on the very same types of cases, did not recuse herself, and upheld the Constitution as the guiding advisory principle.
Edit: BTW, for those interested, insofar as the Catholic teaching on capital punishment goes, it has not changed. Nor can it.. Relatively recent statements by bishops and the Pope on the death penalty are prudential judgements. Basically, opinions on the exercise of capital punishment.
How about Tom Cotton?
Cotton would be great... but POTUS prefers a woman fill that seat.
He prefers someone the Democrats can't delay the nomination past Jan 20th with fake sexual harassment accusations.
POTUS already announced he's nominating a woman.
Cotton would have been awesome.
Sauce?