169
Comments (9)
sorted by:
9
jubyeonin 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is pissing me off. The left keeps trying to change every argument and claim they're right and we're wrong on a completely different thing.

7
svartchimpans [S] 7 points ago +8 / -1

Yeah it's called gaslighting. They are denying objective reality. Such as "fiery but peaceful protests" while the world burns behind the fake news anchor.

This is the game they play on every damn "fact check". Trump will say something like "I just helped return a dozen soldiers to America". "Fact check: FALSE, it was 15 soldiers, not a dozen".

3
hereticpatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well, RBG wrote some of it and signed it, but she didn’t right the age of consent part, although she still signed on as a co-author of the whole thing. Fact Check: Fucking True

3
jubyeonin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, it's not like just signing off on it. She signed it as a co-author. It could have been removed. The issue is changing the argument from it being the age to it being the gender and not having anything to do with age. The article implies that because their claim is it's about gender that it can't be about age of consent.

1
svartchimpans [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. And that is both sick and hilarious. "Well since she made the gender more inclusive, this has nothing to do with lowering the age of consent even though that is exactly what she proposed". "

5
Notablitheringidiot 5 points ago +6 / -1

U.S. Supreme Court Justice (((Ruth Bader Ginsburg))) sits onstage as the third speaker of the (((David Berg))) Distinguished Speakers Series, at the Museum of the (((City of New York)))

Conservative UCLA law professor (((Eugene Volokh))) told the (((Washington Post))) that (((Ginsburg))) was likely "the victim of a drafting error."

Sigh.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
leing15 3 points ago +3 / -0

Any person under 9" -Mohammed

Actually, that would be "under 6." He waited until Aisha was 9 to have full on intercourse, but he "married" her when she was 6 y.o., and sexually abused her (without penetrating her) until she was 9.

It's not like he waited because of some feeling of respect for the fact that she was a child either. He waited only until intercourse was physically possible without destroying her genitalia and possibly making her bleed to death.

2
svartchimpans [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

He was truly a gentleman who showed restraint by only "thighing" (rubbing his dingding on) her between the ages of 6 and 9. Clearly he was a gentleman and a scholar for not penetrating her until she was 9. Allah is great! Mohammed was his chosen messenger, aka the perfect man and the indication for how every Muslim should live! Bigot!