There is no evidence that she is lax on immigration. That rumor comes from a bunch of retards who see that she adopted two kids from Hati and go “seeee!! She totally wants open borders!!!!”
That decision highlights the problem and naivete we're facing as conservatives trying to counter the leftist agenda.
On the surface, it seems fair to allow local government leeway in deciding its own measures and regulations. But when leftists are involved, what happens every single time is that leeway is then used to restrict the "leeway" of its citizens. Essentially, if you give the leftists a long leash, they end up wrapping that leash around the necks of their citizenry.
This is why limiting local government action IS NOT a restriction of freedom. Rather it is a guarantee of freedom for the citizens.
I honestly don't know why these "smart" judges haven't figured this out.
There is no evidence that she is lax on immigration. That rumor comes from a bunch of retards who see that she adopted two kids from Hati and go “seeee!! She totally wants open borders!!!!”
The favoring gatherings for BLM terrorists while allowing churches to be closes is real though.
This coming from someone who thinks she would be a worthy Justice
Gonna need a source on it. I don’t think people are making that one up but I want to verify.
https://cookcountyrecord.com/stories/553524774-appeals-court-pritzker-ok-to-limit-or-not-limit-religious-political-gatherings-to-combat-covid-19
Thanks to myth who provided me the link yesterday/friday
That decision highlights the problem and naivete we're facing as conservatives trying to counter the leftist agenda.
On the surface, it seems fair to allow local government leeway in deciding its own measures and regulations. But when leftists are involved, what happens every single time is that leeway is then used to restrict the "leeway" of its citizens. Essentially, if you give the leftists a long leash, they end up wrapping that leash around the necks of their citizenry.
This is why limiting local government action IS NOT a restriction of freedom. Rather it is a guarantee of freedom for the citizens.
I honestly don't know why these "smart" judges haven't figured this out.