Instead, it means that the question is whether the government has the power to disable the exercise of a right that they otherwise possess, rather than whether they possess the right at all.
2A
...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
I'm no Supreme Court Justice, but I don't think any "question" exists.
How tf do you become a judge and not have the ability to read?
Kanter v Barr:
2A
I'm no Supreme Court Justice, but I don't think any "question" exists.
How tf do you become a judge and not have the ability to read?
Exactly. Right there with you man.