1398
Comments (38)
sorted by:
61
Freetrial 61 points ago +62 / -1

Can we be honest here and speak about the real Atrocity? The Fact that Democrats NOW are calling for Decorum and "Waiting" for the next president.... but they didn't have that precedent when they killed the Filibuster. They didn't have that precedent when they were trying to ram their SC justice. In my eyes, The Democrats are a dog, and they pissed on the rug. Rub their noses in it. Fill the seat.

33
VoteCyborgTrump2040 33 points ago +33 / -0

They tried to impeach the president for no reason instead of allowing people to vote on whether to reelect him. They want to change literally every norm. They literally don't have respect for a single norm. They are currently destroying the norms around voting by mass mail-in ballots, allowing ballot harvesting, allowing no signature verification, etc.

It's a desperate bid to stop this, since they are powerless and have no leverage.

16
Freetrial 16 points ago +16 / -0

YEP. As I've seen said here before. If Democrats didn't have Double Standards, they'd have no standards at all.

12
VoteCyborgTrump2040 12 points ago +12 / -0

Oh yeah, and I forgot to mention. They all have quotes about impeachment, and how it should never be a partisan thing, and used as a political tool. And that impeachment should only happen if everyone on both sides of the aisle agrees.

And impeachment has always required a crime in the past. This is the first impeachment where there was no crime and no bipartisan support.

Literally this fucking year they did this. Completely obliterating norms.

8
Freetrial 8 points ago +8 / -0

LOL YEAH THAT'S TRUE. An Impeachment vote that LITERALLY came down to party line (with a few dems actually breaking the pack) and yet Republicans are supposed to pump the brakes and "Have some Decorum". GEOTUS 2020 Fill the Seat.

11
LongKahn 11 points ago +11 / -0

How dare you denigrate dogs by comparing them to Democrats!

6
Freetrial 6 points ago +6 / -0

KEK

7
xBigCoffinHunter 7 points ago +7 / -0

Decorum? They pushed past that a long time ago. They would pounce on this if given the opportunity

5
Mrsattorney 5 points ago +5 / -0

John Roberts gave Ginsburg and the Dems every opportunity to get past the election. If the roles had been reversed, the Dems would have insisted that an ailing conservative justice step down.

3
Freetrial 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, as I've said before, Democrats only have Double Standards lol. They know it, and it's why they're freaking out now, because they're POWERLESS to stop this.

4
VetforTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Every rule they changed was so the killer Hillary could use them against us. They have been caught in their own snare, just like God say they will be.

3
Freetrial 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep. Democrats have no foresight on if the other team wins lol. They just believe they could be in power forever. As I'd say "The gloves are off. Bite the Pillow bitch, She's going in dry"

23
deleted 23 points ago +23 / -0
11
glow-operator-2-0 11 points ago +11 / -0

That's the most horrific thing I've heard thus far, and to be honest, I believe there was a great possibility that was what they were looking for.

5
MegoThor 5 points ago +5 / -0

👆 THIS

11
Choomguy 11 points ago +11 / -0

Textbook narcissism as well as shitty gambling odds. FAFO.

9
2020REBOUND 9 points ago +9 / -0

Same with the 150 open judge seats.. 0bama wasnt lazy about it.. it was a deal for Hillary.

7
doodaddy 7 points ago +7 / -0

She gambled with our constitution. It “her” seat.

Last I checked the constitution didn’t say anything about a Supreme Court justice Overriding the president on this

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
IcedCovfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ruthie and H were both creaming their Depends over the thought of that photo op.

5
tcriv 5 points ago +5 / -0

what gamble? there was no gamble.

when you gamble, you put up some risk hoping to gain a. reward.

what's the reward? they risked everything for some evil witch's vanity? stupid as FUCK.

1
d_lock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Her gain vs the Dems' risk. She would get a few more years of power, the Dems would risk a little power. Probably saw it as a safe bet since Killary was supposed to win.

4
George 4 points ago +5 / -1

You know, that's a good point. Why wouldn't they have switched her out? Doubt that was RBG decision. The deep state isn't going to let some old lady decide on her own if she stays.

These master minds wouldn't be that stupid would they? I mean, why risk it? They gain nothing when they wait (if they expected to win 2016)

11
Psykohot 11 points ago +11 / -0

I honestly think it was rbg was racist. And not lightly, look at her clerk's over the years. I do t think she trusted Obama to replace her with her wishes.

5
WildCape 5 points ago +5 / -0

I agree. It's what I think as well.

4
NuclearRocks1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Look at her decisions. Probably had white hood in her closet.

3
solarsavior 3 points ago +3 / -0

They never thought she would lose.

3
Bedminster 3 points ago +3 / -0

This has back fired monumentally for the dems. I see Barry took his wife's cock out of his mouth long enough to tell the senate not to confirm anyone until after the election. Go back to getting pegged you faggot and fade the fuck away as the worst president in America history.

3
pursuitoftruth1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think the plan was for RBG to retire in 2015 or 2016 but they lost the senate in 2014.

3
Get-schlonged 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also she wasn’t murdered like scalia

2
Friend_of_John_Galt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Democrats said they would expand the Supreme Court if they got the Senate back. They said that much already, even if republicans hold off they'll do it anyway to ensure future dissent is silenced. Fill the seat.

2
herder 2 points ago +2 / -0

For those who don't know Robert Barnes he is a genius, he is really super smart. He is on this YouTube channels every Sunday: https://www.youtube.com/c/VivaFrei/videos. Check him out if you already haven't.

2
Nanteen 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's right the only person left us should be angry with about this nomination is Ruth.

She chose to be selfish and want the honor of a female president appointing her replacement.

Her hubris caused this no one else just her

2
VetforTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah because they promised that appointment to a certain person on a Certain tarmac. They fucked up and we need to exploit fhat.

2
OnlySlightlyNaughty 2 points ago +2 / -0

She has been effectively an empty seat for years. If the house wasn’t dishonest she would have been removed already. Having someone terminally ill on the bench was absolutely criminal.

RGB knew she was attempting to delay until Democrat’s held power and so did the House. This farce just didn’t pan out how they would have liked.

Too bad! Fill that seat!

2
Choppermagic 2 points ago +2 / -0

IT wasn't a gamble. It was sheer hubris and conceit. They think they own the universe.

1
d_lock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Democrats have made a series of bad decisions. RBG stayed on the bench, they got rid of the nominee filibuster, they decided to threaten and cajole for Kavanaugh... When will these people ever learn that their actions have consequences