And that is the reason why the UN will never act against the US.
It's not there to fight the local population of their member states or fight on one side in civil war. It's goal is international peace keeping - if there was a war they might go in and make sure that peace negotiations are done properly.
They are not an invasion army and any retarded left who thinks the UN will do something in the US has no fucking clue.
They also aren't aware of how many crimes on locals the peacekeeping "ble helmets" commit. Many of the UN forces are from developing nations. Imagine loosing a bunch of third worlders in the US with automatic weapons.
What the leftists who dream of UN armed intervention don't realize is that blue helmets would be like if antifa/BLM had automatic weapons and knew they faced absolutely no consequences for their conduct.
I 100% advocate for violence against foreign invaders..
Foreign and domestic.
Soft bellies like the "we don't advocate for violence" nonsense.
Small doses...
And that is the reason why the UN will never act against the US.
It's not there to fight the local population of their member states or fight on one side in civil war. It's goal is international peace keeping - if there was a war they might go in and make sure that peace negotiations are done properly.
They are not an invasion army and any retarded left who thinks the UN will do something in the US has no fucking clue.
They also aren't aware of how many crimes on locals the peacekeeping "ble helmets" commit. Many of the UN forces are from developing nations. Imagine loosing a bunch of third worlders in the US with automatic weapons.
What the leftists who dream of UN armed intervention don't realize is that blue helmets would be like if antifa/BLM had automatic weapons and knew they faced absolutely no consequences for their conduct.
Am I the only one who would shoot on sight anyone wearing a blue helmet?
No, in fact almost everywhere the blue helmets have been deployed shot back.
Edit: Shot first. On sight.