27
posted ago by Boldwithoutthebull +27 / -0

When I argue with libs I like to provide evidence to back up my claims but sometimes it's very difficult to find the statistics, articles, infographics etc. that I need so a simple reply can take 15-20min just doing research. It would be so cool to be able to look up Hillary Clinton for example and have a searchable page of all her scandals, quotes, emails, interviews etc and have everything searchable by keywords.

I'd also love to see pages on crime statistics, gender/race statistics, leftist terrorist groups, "global warming", election fraud/meddling, fake Republicans, the media, Hollywood, pizza gate etc.

Basically I just want a wiki/imdb that uses facts with property sourced and archived links.

We can call it ISDB= Internet Swamp DataBase

Comments (6)
sorted by:
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
yallsegregationist 2 points ago +2 / -0

this is a great idea, would be great to more easily see all the connections between these rats

1
Boldwithoutthebull [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would be great to have all the swamp rats tracked like a family tree. Like how the Atlantic printed the story about Trump disparaging the troops then we found out that steve jobs' widow is one of the owners and that she had donated the maximum amount to Biden's campaign.

2
Old_ex_Commie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Excellent idea. I regret that I have but one upvote to give.

2
Alars 2 points ago +2 / -0

Basically all you need is to create your own Wiki site. Wikipedia-like software, called Wiki software, is available from many projects and companies.

It's not hard, nor expensive. It requires some technical skill.

There's already a conservative version of Wikipedia called Conservapedia (https://conservapedia.com) but this does not specialize in political scandals, although it could become what you suggested.

2
Haitianbychoice360 2 points ago +2 / -0

We used to have this readily available as a sidebar on the site that shall not be named. I have mentioned it before and would love to have it again. Not sure if it is harder to have it on this site. Not a programmer so I am clueless. I am guessing there is a good reason? Dunno.