4486
Comments (399)
sorted by:
339
z89101 339 points ago +342 / -3

Excellent development. Lock in Pierre Delecto and get it on!

176
Rockribbed1 176 points ago +178 / -2

He is a cnut. Don't believe that he will support GEOTUS

103
deleted 103 points ago +147 / -44
146
The_Litehaus_Abides 146 points ago +147 / -1

I've always thought there was fraud involved in Mitt's primary win. His opponent was perfect.

Mormon, father of 8, both a doctor and a lawyer, experience in the state legislature. Romney and the good old boys cheated.

72
FireannDireach 72 points ago +77 / -5

Don't forget, his niece runs the GOP.

41
deleted 41 points ago +45 / -4
40
alfredbester 40 points ago +41 / -1

Don't forget this is politics and even Potus has to play the game sometimes.

30
JustHereForTheSalmon 30 points ago +30 / -0

History will remember Trump giving Mitt all the olive branches he could only to get repeatedly stabbed in the back.

18
MAGAPlenty 18 points ago +19 / -1

The same reason GEOTUS has Cocaine Mitch’s wife has DOT secretary

17
Worldtraveler0405 17 points ago +18 / -1

Is Ronna McDaniel the niece of Mittens? What is the game they're playing, Mormon Monopoly?

5
formerlythetim 5 points ago +5 / -0

I agree! Isn't it wild how some purists have abandoned Trump for stuff like this? You have to look at the grand scheme which is the economy, energy independence, national defense, not offense, SC judge selection! and so much more, fighting fake news, he's still a huge breath of fresh air our Trump

4
Kek_Johnson 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't forget. His big purple rubber dildo is named Pierre.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
5
Mashiki 5 points ago +5 / -0

Stay right there, I'm baring my two hollow fangs.

27
deleted 27 points ago +29 / -2
65
anymouse22334455 65 points ago +65 / -0

Mitt Romney would suck dick for bus fare and still choose to walk home.

13
crimsonfancy 13 points ago +13 / -0

Ok. Thats spicy. Kek

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
33
Pilotmtb 33 points ago +35 / -2

I’ve got a lot of family in Utah and they hate what he’s done as of late. I dont know anyone there who’s going to vote for him for a second term

13
45ACP 13 points ago +15 / -2

I'll believe it when I see it. I was raised mormon and can tell you that mittens is the only thing more popular among mormons than lying about jerking off.

5
Pilotmtb 5 points ago +6 / -1

Haha oh man I met dudes in college who claimed they had never jerked off in their lives. I was like yeah sure you haven’t buddy

2
winsome 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mormons hate Romney?

3
Pilotmtb 3 points ago +4 / -1

My family hates Romney, they are all Mormons, their friends hate Romney they are all Mormons. I’m not Mormon anymore but yeah Romney only won because he’s a famous Mormon. Anyone who’s paid attention to what he’s done hates him

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
9
Necrovoter 9 points ago +9 / -0

Spite is one of the few drugs more dangerous than meth. If Romney can't learn to forgive Trump for embarrassing him, he's going to be eaten up with hate and do things that will land him in Hell next to McCain.

9
Tokyo20DrinkingGame 9 points ago +9 / -0

The Romneys in Utah are like the Bushes in Texas. Even the movie "The Sandlot" has a Romney in it....the baseball field that they play the Little League team at is L.C. Romney Park (it was filmed in SLC).

3
AlohaSnackbar 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sal Tlay Ka Siti?

Where the goat-meat there is plentiful And they have vitamin injections by the case The war-lords there are friendly They help you cross the street And there’s a Red Cross on every corner With all the flour you can eat!

7
KuhlooKuhlay 7 points ago +7 / -0

willard thinks he has a chance for the republican nomination in 2024. that's what his nonsense is all about plain and simple.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
12
Shitsbrokeyo 12 points ago +12 / -0

Been rampant cheating going of years. The only reason we have Trump is our turnout was so great.

10
DblFistinPiston 10 points ago +10 / -0

I agree, Utah is almost completely based. Romney is a powerful man in Utah whether we like it or not.

50
HistoryInvestigator 50 points ago +58 / -8

Why are the Mormons to blame? Hell, Trump himself endorsed Romney for Senate. Probably the worst move of his entire 4 years IMO.

Edit: if Mormons are to blame for Romney, then they get the credit for Orrin Hatch and the rest of the representatives and Senate. Can't have one without the other.

41
Ithrowawaay 41 points ago +43 / -2

Romney is a turncoat, bred from Michigan Republican stock.

He bamboozled me as well in 2012.

24
deleted 24 points ago +24 / -0
14
deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
3
Chiliad5 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mitt's opponent was a Mormon too. But he had no outside name recognition. The potential embarrassment of a former presidential nominee and governor running for the Senate and losing was so great that the money and the national endorsements poured in. Yes, regrettably, even from GEOTUS.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
13
deleted 13 points ago +22 / -9
24
DeplorableCentipede 24 points ago +24 / -0

Nope. Trump endorsed Romney 4 months before the primary even though Romney had a viable opponent.

5
FergieJR 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ahh I didn't know that

4
HistoryInvestigator 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks, beat me to it.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
6
DrCowboyPresident 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hell, Trump himself endorsed Romney for Senate.

Because Trump doesn't make losing moves. If he's going to win anyway, it's the smart play. If the GOP establishment really turned on Trump he'd be a total lame duck.

2
HistoryInvestigator 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd agree with you if he endorsed after the primary, but Trump's support for the other candidate may have locked out Pierre Delecto.

3
DrCowboyPresident 3 points ago +3 / -0

The primary can be unwinnable too. He has to be careful.

Even winning one Senate seat might not be worth the cost. If he's openly hostile to the GOP establishment, it's curtains.

5
whippeat 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trump is too nice. Always gives people second chances and hopes they will do things better this time.

But as he said, politicians are so much more dishonest than businessmen.

10
misterLahey 10 points ago +11 / -1

This.

6
edxzxz 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nah, they're ok - it's just Romney that's a dick.

5
UpTrump 5 points ago +12 / -7

3 Utah Mormons downvoted you

-10
deleted -10 points ago +10 / -20
-5
Pilotmtb -5 points ago +6 / -11

Amen Brother OlDirtyBarrister

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
CaptainChrisPBacon 1 point ago +2 / -1

He has been the most Loyal Out Of All The Disloyal.

3
doug2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Quite the achievement there.

1
SixteenBeatsAOne 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. Pierre Derilecto views his upcoming SCOTUS vote as his McCain thumbs-down moment. Derilecto craves the Democratic love that McCain received after his downvote.

48
PyroSphere 48 points ago +48 / -0

Hopefully, the Turtle can turn cuckboy into Stormin' Mormon for at least one crucial vote.

21
newlyfoundpatriot 21 points ago +22 / -1

If Mitt acts like a little bitch at this crucial moment, he can kiss his political career good bye forever

17
what_the_shet 17 points ago +17 / -0

I don't see how he hasn't already. At this point his cuckery is just getting more ridicule.

14
Dingus 14 points ago +14 / -0

It wasn't going anywhere already tho. He's the Megyn Kelley of senators.

2
PepesCovfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hilarious

4
UpTrump 4 points ago +7 / -3

He'll get reelected again. All he needs to do is pander for a few months before his election

7
newlyfoundpatriot 7 points ago +7 / -0

IF the senate start the vote for the new judge, everyone will see what Mitt Romney does and he will have nowhere to hide. His name will be everywhere

1
AmazingFlightLizard 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Lindsey Graham plan.

2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well for now most of the RINOs are against the vote, not the nominee regardless of whoever that will be. If that's their stance, then let them abstain instead of voting no. Just let them count themselves out as long as the GOP still has enough yes votes to secure the result and deliver a new justice. That's what Murkovsky did on Kavanaugh anyway.

1
newlyfoundpatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

that's actually something I didn't think about. So I may be completely ignorant to this matter, but are you saying that if some senators abstain from voting all together, then the number needed to vote yes in order to pass also is lessened? In other words, as long as it's a majority of any side?

2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, Harry Reid abolished the 60 vote threshold. Now it only requires a simple majority to confirm a SCOTUS justice. Kavanaugh was confirmed by 50 votes if I remember that right. Two GOP senators abstained and one Dem joined the GOP to confirm him.

1
newlyfoundpatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice. Its looking good then. Plus Lindsay Graham just confirmed they have enough numbers to push the judge in. November is looking great.

2
Chiliad5 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mitt's a lot older than he looks. In fact, he was the oldest rookie senator in history. He doesn't come up for reelection again until he's 77. He runs as a Republican in pretty much the reddest state in the union. He has tons of money. He already ran for President and lost. It's not like he has a long political career in front of him anyway.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
11
rebelde_sin_causa 11 points ago +11 / -0

If Mitt ever has any intention at all of representing his state he has to vote to confirm

I don't know if he cares about his legacy or the way people remember him, but siding with the Ds here would seal it for all time

35
Dictator_Bob 35 points ago +35 / -0

Mitt walks with marxists now.

17
EDDIT_IS_CUCKED 17 points ago +17 / -0

We're talking about GOP, not democrat votes. We know where Pierre stands.

12
d_lock 12 points ago +13 / -1

Sounds like even without tasty peter, they still have the ability to get a judge in. They'll have to make sure voters remember that next primary in UT.

15
GrabLifeByThePussy 15 points ago +15 / -0

Remember we just need 50. Pence can cast the deciding vote in the event of a tie.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
doug2 4 points ago +4 / -0

True. I'd prefer a non vote to a no, obviously.

1
d_lock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly, that's why we don't need him. In the event he wants to be a sourpuss and vote against the nominee, I think the voters should be reminded later.

200
JoeBidensDementia 200 points ago +204 / -4

Cocaine Mitch is going to save America.

132
NoahGav 132 points ago +132 / -0

"Fine, I'll do it myself" - Cocaine Turtle 2020.

27
deleted 27 points ago +27 / -0
15
AmericanJawa 15 points ago +15 / -0

"Fine..."

"...I'll..."

"...do..."

"...it..."

"...my...self..."

2
PremiumPatriotPepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

We have the best turtles don't we folks?

2
aaafirefly123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Much better then ¡Yeb!

47
cuckslasher 47 points ago +47 / -0

RELEASE THE TURTLE

16
UpTrump 16 points ago +16 / -0

But muh "expert says SC nomination unlikely!"

12
doug2 12 points ago +12 / -0

Hell they haven't gotten it yet. For trump unlikely is like breakfast. It's just par for the course.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
14
Afeazo 14 points ago +14 / -0

Can't wait to tell my grand kids in the future that back in 2020 a cocaine trafficking turtle saved the USA from commies.

2
PepesCovfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lmao

2
tdwinner2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh yeah, we're going to have epic stories for our grandkids.

190
deleted 190 points ago +191 / -1
121
ippwndu 121 points ago +121 / -0

The Democrats and the media will call us Nazis anyway, so we need to stop giving a fuck as to what they think.

68
NormaJeanRocks 68 points ago +68 / -0

I stopped giving a fuck what people thought of me about 3 years ago, they're the true racists. I just hate people that hate America, black or white....same to me.

32
lefty295 32 points ago +32 / -0

They call us nazis, when they want to pack the Supreme court... who wrote 2020? I want the drugs they were on.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
10
FireannDireach 10 points ago +10 / -0

This - if you're gonna get attacked anyway, get what you want. That's what they do.

Nominating and seating a justice isn't illegal, isn't un-Constitutional, and is the right and privilege of the President's. Reverse this, and you know they'd be up everyone's ass like an opened umbrella that "they would want us to do this."

They want us to believe the lies of her granddaughter, and CHANGE tradition that they supported in the past. Screw you. You lost the election, WE get to do this. Suck on it, crybabies. Call us nazis? Then we're justice nominating and sitting nazis. See what happens?

10
UpTrump 10 points ago +10 / -0

Pelosi says she's trying to impeach Trump again to stop the nomination

4
aaafirefly123 4 points ago +4 / -0

Won’t work, and it would make Trump even more popular.

4
Yucky 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly. When they threaten with (paraphrasing) "We'll call you racist, organize riots, and violently attack Trump supporters and anyone to the right of Karl Marx".

Our response is: You're already doing that. So what.

35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
17
WishdoctorsSong 17 points ago +17 / -0

Say what you will about them, the GOP held the line when it came to Scalia's seat and handed it over to Trump.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
10
Fabius 10 points ago +10 / -0

PACK THE COURT

THIS IS WAR

3
EpicTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Would not put it past President Trump to talk about this in his next term assuming that Republicans hold the Senate. Not that I would think he wants to do it, just to shove it back in the face of the Dems. “So, Senator Schumer, let’s talk about your plan to expand the number of justices on the Supreme Court”.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
hit_backspace 10 points ago +10 / -0

The left controls mainstream information. Uninformed people lean left because of this. All people see now is leftist narratives unless they come across conservative sources by chance.

142
smerfylicious 142 points ago +145 / -3

JUSTICE LAGOA INBOUND

  • CUBAN AMERICAN
  • CONSERVATIVE
  • ONLY 52 YEARS OLD

6-3 COURT BEFORE ELECTION CONFIRMED

NEXT 4 YEARS, REPLACE BREYER'S ICE CREAM, TRUMP HAS 5 SCOTUS PICKS. 7-2 COURT BOYS.

43
JS_Mill 43 points ago +44 / -1

Choo Choo mother f******

40
Sporadica 40 points ago +40 / -0

My bet is Thomas steps down when Trump is re-elected as he's up their in age. Sotomayer isn't doing too well with Type 1 diabeetus, Breyer is 82 years old so honestly we could see 3 more picks next term! make that shit 7-2!

25
deleted 25 points ago +26 / -1
16
AmericanJawa 16 points ago +16 / -0

'Roberts Court' might be its official name, but with as many nominations as Trump is getting, they might as well just call it the Trump Court.

13
Carry_Your_Name 13 points ago +13 / -0

SCOTUS pick was already a major campaign issue in the POTUS race back in 2016. Both sides were aware of those justices' age and health condition. Crooked H herself confessed that the next president could appoint four or five in two terms. And so were many patriets who were unhappy about the SCOTUS ruling on gay marriage and concerning about the future lineup of justices. They were afraid that the court would be taken over by the left for decades to come. Scalia's tragic passing only made them more anxious, and in the end, it turned out to be the key that drove them out to vote and send Trump into the white house. I guess cocaine mitch must've realized that as well. That's why he gambled with his decision of stonewalling Merrick Garland's nomination. But the dems were too dumb to realize that. They were mocking him for delaying the inevitable.

8
daberoniandcheese 8 points ago +8 / -0

Man, what a watershed moment Trump's election was. I shudder to think what Hilldog's court would look like right now.

It is truly the grace of God that we don't have to suffer through that.

11
DeplorableCentipede 11 points ago +11 / -0

Thomas has been the single most consistently conservative justice on the Supreme Court. There’s no guarantee his replacement would be nearly as conservative.

4
Sporadica 4 points ago +4 / -0

True, but I wouldn't want to take the chance that he becomes the next RGB, working himselfe to death to try and make it past a D president.

2
EpicTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why wouldn’t the Trump team talk with Justice Thomas about candidates for his replacement? Seems reasonable.

3
DeplorableCentipede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even Justice Thomas wouldn’t be able to know for sure how anyone would vote once on the Supreme Court. I would rather keep him around for as long as he is capable because he’s truly the conservative anchor on the Supreme Court.

9
JuicyfearsMAGA 9 points ago +9 / -0

Alito has been rumored to be considering retirement as well. His family apparently wants out of dc

5
OrenthalJamesObama 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good for them. It puts Mos Eisley to shame for the most part.

6
WinnerPlaysTCU 6 points ago +6 / -0

We need to gain in the Senate with MAGA Senators this year. Don’t overlook those elections. Tubberville has Bama on lockdown. Grab a couple more and we can run whoever the hell we want for SCOTUS and no amount of Mittens can stop us

4
BigPanda71 4 points ago +4 / -0

McSally is going to lose AZ, so that’s one down. I assume this is the year Collins loses in Maine, to that’s two down. Haven’t seen Cory Gardner’s polling in Colorado, but I assume he’s losing. That’s three down. Ernst is three points behind in Iowa, so that could be four down.

Montana is going to be close, but let’s say we pull it out. With a Tubberville win that leaves us at 50-50, with Pence breaking the tie on anything of substance.

3
Carry_Your_Name 3 points ago +3 / -0

Isn't Jones up for reelection in Alabama? At least that seat can be easily retrieved. The appointment of Sessions for AG was a huge mistake. Just because he was one of the few endorsers of the Trump campaign doesn't mean he was a good candidate for the job.

3
BigPanda71 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, that’s the seat that Tubberville will presumably win back. But the other four I listed are probable GOP losses. A strong Trump showing might drag Ernst across the finish line (like he did for Ron Johnson in WI and Pat Toomey in PA in 2016) but McSally is definitely going to lose. Collins and Gardner are probably a lost cause too. Their states are too blue.

Assuming a Tubberville win, we can lose four and still hold the tie break with Pence. That’s not a lot of breathing room. Plus I think Murkowski will end up caucusing with the Dems before this is all over (my personal hunch based on my gut) so ideally we need to go into 2021 with 51 seats.

This is a tough cycle on the Senate side, and I get the feeling we’re going to end up with Majority Leader Schumer until 2022. I don’t mean to be a pessimist, but I have a really bad feeling.

2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's the seat which Tubberville is expected to fill? In Alabama? Man, I wasn't following the senate races lately. The map looks really awful for the GOP this year, which only makes this SCOTUS vote more critical. It MUST be done when the GOP still has a majority. It's a God given opportunity too for Ernst, Gardner and other vulnerable ones. They may have a chance to turn the tide and jack up their numbers if they fight hard in this battle by showing their steadfast support for the nominee. If they virtue signal, though, they're definitely gonna lose.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
EpicTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

John James is polling even with Gary Peters. He could pull off a win and finally give Michigan Republicans a voice in the Senate for this first time in decades.

29
UpTrump 29 points ago +30 / -1

LAGOA > ACB

23
DrVSGGEOTUSPhD 23 points ago +23 / -0

SAY NO TO ACB!

She said she would recuse if she might have some religious conflict...and the one she listed was some straight BULLSHIT

...Barrett co-authored a scholarly legal article with John H. Garvey, now the President of the Catholic University of America. They stated their conclusion quite bluntly:

"[W]e believe that Catholic judges (if they are faithful to the teaching of their church) are morally precluded from enforcing the death penalty. This means that they can neither themselves sentence criminals to death nor enforce jury recommendations of death."

Catholics differ on this issue for theological reasons, but what matters is what Barrett believes. A full ten years before Pope Francis made clear that he considers all (not most) capital punishment “inadmissible,” Barrett was anticipating the change in Catholic teaching, and binding herself to it. Why? She cites a document of the Second Vatican Council:

"Bishops, teaching in communion with the Roman Pontiff, are to be respected by all as witnesses to divine and Catholic truth. In matters of faith and morals, the bishops speak in the name of Christ and the faithful are to accept their teaching and adhere to it with a religious assent of soul."

Source: https://humanevents.com/2019/09/19/amy-coney-barrett-is-not-a-safe-pick-for-the-supreme-court/

TLDR; She was like "Whell... some commie Bishops said a thing, and it's not canonical, but I have so suck these Bishops' dicks sooooo I guess I'll have to sit this important decision out."

WE CAN'T HAVE SOMEONE WHO THINKS THAT'S OK!!

7
vacu 7 points ago +7 / -0

Don't worry. If Trump even gets a whiff of the word "recuse", he's going to take that magic marker and cross her name off the list.

5
Yucky 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep. With Sessions' "recusal" on purely political grounds, that word is heresy at this point.

2
DrVSGGEOTUSPhD 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your fired

6
64-65-61-64-72-62-67 6 points ago +9 / -3

Women get soft on the most asinine reasons. They must go back to where they belong: the nurturing supporting role.

4
Yucky 4 points ago +4 / -0

No softie chicks, ACB should not be considered at all.

4
vacu 4 points ago +4 / -0

Catholics differ on this issue for theological reasons, but what matters is what Barrett believes. A full ten years before Pope Francis made clear that he considers all (not most) capital punishment “inadmissible,” Barrett was anticipating the change in Catholic teaching, and binding herself to it.

I'm pro-christianity and even pro-catholicism, but we can't have some fag in a white robe dictating laws in our country.

2
DrVSGGEOTUSPhD 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damn straight.

And it's not even a Catholic issue, Scalia never had this problem... It's ACB's personal retard interpretation. The church was ok with capital punishment for 2000 years, right up to a couple years ago when bergolio started literally started making stuff up to suit his commie agenda...and that was years after ACB wrote her dumb article.

NO ACB

14
mathman 14 points ago +14 / -0

The great thing about Lagoa is that politically she's actually a good replacement for two justices, Ginsburg and Sotomayor. Then when Wise Latina goes into her final diabetic coma, President Trump can nominate a solid right-winger to secure our liberty for thirty more years.

3
UpTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is LAGOA not a solid conservative?

5
mathman 5 points ago +5 / -0

Bush appointee, some say she's weak on abortion and 2A.

I suppose my point would be that she doesn't have to be the best nominee ever, so long as we can get her through the process, secure the integrity of the election, and shut up the psychotic Democrats one more time.

2
Two_Scoops__ 2 points ago +2 / -0

This all revolves around abortion does it not? That's gotta be important

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
12
foom 12 points ago +12 / -0

That's one thing I was thinking about. Will Roberts just go ahead and totally blow his cover and start voting Degenerate every time?

2
Shivin302 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think he is a democrat, and that he has become cucked recently because the left has some dirt on him

18
keithkman 18 points ago +19 / -1

Trump saves America!

97
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 97 points ago +97 / -0

Honestly, how worthless of a person do you have to be to claim to be a Republican and say you don't want to vote before the election, like Murkowski is doing. Just disgraceful.

53
keithkman 53 points ago +53 / -0

She’s not a Republican.

27
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 27 points ago +27 / -0

I know that. But she claims it.

11
Toughsky_Shitsky 11 points ago +14 / -3

And Michelle 0bama claims to have a pussy.

People lie to gain a personal advantage, especially in politics.

6
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

I said "claims to be a Republican". I understand she's not.

1
OhLollyLollyPop 1 point ago +1 / -0

She is a spoiler for the Dems.

1
Six-two 1 point ago +10 / -9

Blame the residents of alaska. It's a cucked frozen backwater shit hole filled with felons hiding from the civilized world.

6
ChokingOnARedpill 6 points ago +6 / -0

lol whoa. I sincerely have never heard that take. Got anything for me to look into on the felons hiding out part?

9
hitchitch2013 9 points ago +9 / -0

Alaska State Troopers! Most of the episodes I saw, they were arresting drunk natives or someone from the lower 48 hiding out there.

7
RustySheckleford 7 points ago +7 / -0

Big state, small police force. Lots of places to hide. But I'd be willing to bet there's a lot of large cities with more wanted felons running around than up here. I don't know what this dudes problem is.

1
OllyOlly 1 point ago +2 / -1

Except he's not wrong at all. It's also common sense unless you're an autist - Alaska is about as far away and sparsely populated as you can get while still being in America.

Obviously shitty people would go there to avoid any.. imperial entanglements.

0
Aisle-is-closed 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just look at the crime rates.

4
nomnomchikhan 4 points ago +4 / -0

She won as a write in candidate. in other words... fraud. Don't blame Alaska citizens on that one.

1
cjcivicx 1 point ago +3 / -2

Just because you can't hunt or fish to save your 600 pound life doesn't mean Alaskans arent hardworking conservatives OUTSIDE of the cities.

I wonder what state you're from where everyone is chaste virgins and no one is a criminal?

-2
Six-two -2 points ago +1 / -3

Lol triggered much?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
47
Knight1_of_Sunset 47 points ago +48 / -1

The walls are closing in on the lefty wieners!

Say your prayers lefty losers!

41
deleted 41 points ago +43 / -2
41
shadows_of_the_mind 41 points ago +42 / -1

I’m not religious but my prayer factory is at maximum output... Godspeed, Cocaine Turtle Lord

39
deleted 39 points ago +39 / -0
20
JS_Mill 20 points ago +20 / -0

Two day confirmation.

1
madagent 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't even need to do that stuff any more if voting just comes down to party lines. Its not like asking the nominee questions is going to change someones mind on voting.

1
chambleepede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe they want to milk as many vitriolic sound bites out of dems as they can?

6
DaLaohu 6 points ago +6 / -0

It really should be anyway. Give the Dems zero time to make up rape victims.

31
AGhost 31 points ago +31 / -0

Let your senators know what you want. Then be prepared to deal with Antifa in the aftermath. If we are lucky they will go so crazy they torpedo the Dems hard.

31
Its_Lt_Col_to_you 31 points ago +32 / -1

Pelosi and Schumer’s threats are not going to help them with independents and moderates. The threats are going to piss off all of the right....I think this is a bad move for the master politicians.

12
Dingus 12 points ago +12 / -0

desperation

4
Carry_Your_Name 4 points ago +4 / -0

And you know what, as soon as the news of RBG's passing broke out, Schumer immediately declared his objection to any attempt of filling the seat, then followed up with his condolences. In other words, politics first, thoughts and prayers second. Some leftists are yelling beep RBG for not retiring during the Obozo administration.

31
turbokid 31 points ago +32 / -1

Mitch deserves a medal. Not just for what he's done recently, but also for stalling/disrupting Obama's attempts to destroy the country. The man is a hero.

8
stevehuffmansbull 8 points ago +9 / -1

He deserves a statue in Trump's garden of heroes!

30
MisterKag 30 points ago +30 / -0

They can lose all three Super RINOs and still get it done with Pence.

Which means Manchin and perhaps another couple red state dems up for re-election will break ranks, too.

McCaskill getting thrown off the Island after Kavanaugh left a mark.

13
RackOps 13 points ago +14 / -1

edit I was mistaken. Manchin did break ranks for Kav, but I still don't think he vote with us this time.

I'm amazed a state as deep red as Best Virginia keeps sending that cuck back to DC.

3
Carry_Your_Name 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don't count on him. He was up for election last time, but not this time.

3
OhLollyLollyPop 3 points ago +3 / -0

He will face massive pressure in W Va to vote for this nominee. The people if all parties are polling iver 60% that they want it done.

7
Greg-2012 7 points ago +7 / -0

They can lose all three Super RINOs and still get it done with Pence.

When I first learned this constitutional fact in elementary school, I thought to myself, votes probably rarely ended in 50/50 ties. I didn't know much about politics at that time.

26
deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
20
JamesSunderland 20 points ago +21 / -1

Grab the brass ring, guys. It's right friggin there.

20
nanowerx 20 points ago +20 / -0

I am not the biggest fan of McConnell, but when shit hits the fan and we need somebody in the GOP to step up, The Turtle is there every time!

Long live Cocaine Mitch!

16
findthewarmspot 16 points ago +16 / -0

Grassley is a go? What about Manchin?

2
RackOps 2 points ago +6 / -4

He won't break ranks for this.

edit I was mistaken. Manchin did break ranks for Kav, but I still don't think he vote with us this time.

10
findthewarmspot 10 points ago +10 / -0

Then WV can do better.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
BigCovfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Manchin DID vote for K

14
SlightlyLargerTub 14 points ago +14 / -0

If they don't vote and confirm then this could energize the Democrat base to turn out in November. They need to snuff this out immediately. Preferably before the first debate.

13
AntsCamera 13 points ago +13 / -0

CO-FUCKING-CAINE!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
AntsCamera 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm so happy there are some O and A refugees here .

2
ImWithHearse 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok, Terrific!

11
pullofthemoon 11 points ago +11 / -0

Good on McConnell, and fingers crossed, but the article isn't as encouraging as the headline suggests. Basically: "Murkowski and Collins oppose, and Mitch can only lose 2 more. And that could be Romney. Or Grassley. Or Gardener." I swear, Senate Republicans are adept at snatching defeat from the jaws of victory.

Hoping for the best, and I think we can do it. But crunch time is always where our closet Dems show their colors.

11
Freedom4545 11 points ago +11 / -0

go turtle go! COCAINE OVERLOAD!

11
zebfross 11 points ago +12 / -1

I was more confident before hearing Pelosi might impeach just to tie up the senate. I wouldn’t put it past some salty Republicans to vote yes on that.

7
Greg-2012 7 points ago +7 / -0

How does that play out? House holds impeachment hearings, senate votes in next justice, right?

2
zebfross 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, the senate is obligated to drop everything to debate the articles of impeachment, so Pelosi could easily ram through a vote and hope the Republicans don’t dismiss it.

3
lefkoslykos 3 points ago +3 / -0

The senate could ram the confirmation through too. They can also move to end the impeachment with a quick vote to end debate immediately, and vote on whatever ridiculous charges crazy nancy wants

6
npc_1234 6 points ago +6 / -0

I fucking dare her to launch a second fake impeachment 3 months before the election.

1
berson129 1 point ago +1 / -0

At that point just call in the military and say what we all kmow it really is. A coup attempt

0
the-new-style 0 points ago +1 / -1

I think that's a bit fake news.

ABC asked if she would impeach, and she didn't say "yes". She did what anyone should do in negotiations and say "I'm not ruling out anything"

10
Wood_Shampoo1 10 points ago +10 / -0

Ready the salt mines!

10
GrabLifeByThePussy 10 points ago +10 / -0

My turtle 🐢

9
JamesSunderland 9 points ago +9 / -0

"But even if Romney comes out in support of not holding a vote before the election, Democrats would still need to pick up one additional GOP senator to prevent a 50-50 tie that Vice President Mike Pence would be all but guaranteed to break."

REEEEEEEEEE

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
Imjustin1000 8 points ago +8 / -0

Wow I might have to send Mitch an 8 ball if he keeps this up!

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
Dahnald2020 8 points ago +8 / -0

Fuck yeah COCAINE MITCH

7
here2red 7 points ago +7 / -0

Is that why Nancy short circuited?

7
bchdrum22 7 points ago +7 / -0

Fuck ‘em all! Ram it down their fucking throats!!!

7
GoBigly 7 points ago +7 / -0

He/she graped someone in the hippocampus 40 years ago so they will delay it until the investigation is complete

6
64-65-61-64-72-62-67 6 points ago +6 / -0

Get a hardliner Constitutionalist and then flush out the Soros DAs. Flush those scums out.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
ToTheRescues 5 points ago +5 / -0

do you think there will be any backstabbers?

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
2
NancysMinge 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can bet on it

4
Basedcanadian 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fucking assault turtle man! 😆

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
Libertas_Vel_Mors 4 points ago +4 / -0

OMG... The dhimmicrat tears and screaming in the comment section is fucking HILARIOUS!

4
Beat_to_Quarters 4 points ago +4 / -0

Dems are going to cook up a scandal that makes it "impossible" to confirm before the election. Either against trump or whomever he picks, no matter what. Remember Kavanaugh's confirmation was going completely smooth because professionally he is untouchable. Dems were throwing every legal challenge at him and they all got crushed. But then they pulled out the attempted sexual assault letter at the very last minute to throw the whole thing into chaos.

3
OhLollyLollyPop 3 points ago +3 / -0

Over 60% of all parties voters want a justice nominated.

4
Wheredidiputit 4 points ago +5 / -1

Wonderful. We get this confirmed the election is in the bag.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
5
The_Left_The 5 points ago +5 / -0

At the same time, don't undermine confidence. Some people are so eager to avoid complacency that they're demoralizing people.

2
lefkoslykos 2 points ago +2 / -0

We might as well win the 2020 election and then the 2021 civil war

4
UndercoverSpez 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Locks down" Republicans saying they are willing to see who the nom is.

3
Justhalftheshaft 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is going to be the fastest confirmation in US history.

4
AbrahamLincoln 4 points ago +4 / -0

The fastest was 0 days. No idea how many hours though.

1
OhLollyLollyPop 1 point ago +1 / -0

RBG was confirmed in 44 days.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Omgwtfbbq 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think they might pick lagoa. I know this is an unpopular opinion.

1
OhLollyLollyPop 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. Amy Coney Barrett 's religious affiliation would be a big issue. The Dems have already insulted her for it.

2
Six-two 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep. Mcconnell will allow the cucks to cast no vote instead of no.