4486
Comments (399)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well for now most of the RINOs are against the vote, not the nominee regardless of whoever that will be. If that's their stance, then let them abstain instead of voting no. Just let them count themselves out as long as the GOP still has enough yes votes to secure the result and deliver a new justice. That's what Murkovsky did on Kavanaugh anyway.

1
newlyfoundpatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

that's actually something I didn't think about. So I may be completely ignorant to this matter, but are you saying that if some senators abstain from voting all together, then the number needed to vote yes in order to pass also is lessened? In other words, as long as it's a majority of any side?

2
Carry_Your_Name 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, Harry Reid abolished the 60 vote threshold. Now it only requires a simple majority to confirm a SCOTUS justice. Kavanaugh was confirmed by 50 votes if I remember that right. Two GOP senators abstained and one Dem joined the GOP to confirm him.

1
newlyfoundpatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice. Its looking good then. Plus Lindsay Graham just confirmed they have enough numbers to push the judge in. November is looking great.