4688
Comments (461)
sorted by:
741
Jimmy_Russler 741 points ago +741 / -0

CNN suddenly trying to look credible, and BLM suddenly scrubbing it's communist rhetoric from its site... Whats going on, is the supreme court pick sending them into a panic?

494
cjcivicx 494 points ago +495 / -1

It's got them thrown off big time. Corona virus was supposed to carry them to November.

345
kag-2020- 345 points ago +345 / -0

Rule 13: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

This one has them short circuiting. Too many targets to focus on. Too many loose ends to tie up. They can't focus on anything. Good morning. Sunday morning.

247
deleted 247 points ago +248 / -1
122
Racerx719 122 points ago +122 / -0

Mods should post a required reading section.

Reccomend: Art of the Deal Think Big Constituon Rules for Radicals Communist Manifesto

Any others pedes?

127
OneTypoComment 127 points ago +133 / -6

the Bible

2
daveinpublic 2 points ago +7 / -5

50 Shades of Gray

-68
unicornpoop -68 points ago +19 / -87

The bible is mostly jewish history, so...

44
rootGoose 44 points ago +45 / -1

Unless you know the Bible you won’t understand Western Civilization, the foundation American principles, history, and culture rests upon.

42
OneTypoComment 42 points ago +43 / -1

do go on

22
Dr_Pooper 22 points ago +31 / -9

The value system of western civilization draws from your so called Jewish history book. Every freedom you have has it's roots there, ingrate.

10
BirchTBarlow 10 points ago +10 / -0

The New Testament

6
Mashiki 6 points ago +6 / -0

Summa Theologica is what you want.

-94
deleted -94 points ago +22 / -116
118
deleted 118 points ago +125 / -7
89
OneTypoComment 89 points ago +92 / -3

Proverbs 11:10

When the righteous prosper, the city rejoices; when the wicked perish, there are shouts of joy.

I vehemently disagree with abortion and lowering the age of consent to 12 years old.

15
Tripin 15 points ago +24 / -9

She wanted to lower the age of consent to 12. But i do agree we shouldn't celebrate her death i just can understand why people are.

12
Amaroq64 12 points ago +12 / -0

I wouldn't celebrate someone's death, but I will laugh at the feisty memes if they deserved the ridicule.

12
Smug_zebra 12 points ago +23 / -11

Celebrating the death of your enemies is a sin. RGB and the other justices that invented the Roe v Wade "law" are culpable for more human death then Stalin or Mao. They are also some of Lucifer's most successful recruiters. I will be asking for forgiveness today.

72
RyanT282 72 points ago +72 / -0

I'd say 1984 is a must-read as well.

44
permissible_missile 44 points ago +45 / -1

In that vein, Fahrenheit 451 and Brave New World as well.

35
RyanT282 35 points ago +36 / -1

Maybe Atlas Shrugged as well?

21
SiBear117 21 points ago +21 / -0

Add in Animal Farm.

13
GeorgeOhwell 13 points ago +13 / -0

Excellent suggestion

11
RyanT282 11 points ago +11 / -0

Username kinda checks out.

10
GoldwaterVoter 10 points ago +10 / -0

And Animal Farm for beginners. I read it in 7th grade,

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
spaceport-terra 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://robertsrules.com/

Robert's rules of order

19
Zizou005 19 points ago +20 / -1

Posted this awhile ago. got very little traction. https://thedonald.win/p/Fz6Wcvxt/novels-the-right-should-read-/

19
RyanT282 19 points ago +19 / -0

It's very hit or miss on here. One can post something great, and nobody glances at it. Then a few minutes later, somebody posts something good or even not good, and it's stickied.

9
Zizou005 9 points ago +9 / -0

yup i agree

15
Ladybug87 15 points ago +15 / -0

Your list is great. Unfortunately, in my opinion, some of the most important books regarding communism have never been translated into English. When I say this, I mainly think about the countless memoirs written by former communist political prisoners. I was born in Romania and moved to the US in my early twenties. I read probably more than 15 such memoirs, I even had the opportunity to meet a few survivors. Saying these books are chilling is understating them. It is such a disservice to humanity that these books don't get an international readership. And I bet other Eastern European countries have their own such books.

The Gulag Archipelago author, Alexandr Solzhenitsyn, described the "Pitesti Phenomenon" (one of the experiments done by communists on young people in the Romanian prisons) as the "most terrible act of barbarism in the contemporary world".

5
LeewardRights 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wonder if any of them (that you read) are online? Online translating isn’t perfect, but I would read through that.

5
DoYouBelieveInMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Devil and Karl Marx is probably right up your alley.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Prometheus76 3 points ago +3 / -0

I read a collection of short stories from the author's experiences in a Soviet work camp. The book is called Kolyma Stories by Varlam Shalamov. It's been translated into English, and I have no idea of how moving they are in Russian, but the translation seems to be very good, because the stories in English still sink into your mind and open your eyes to the insanity of communism.

https://smile.amazon.com/Kolyma-Stories-Review-Books-Classics/dp/1681372142/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&keywords=kolyma+tales&qid=1600691851&sr=8-2

3
glow-operator-2-0 3 points ago +3 / -0

Closest we get to that in America is Arthur Koestler's Darkness at Noon.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
2
Prometheus76 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you want a more bite-sized approach to learning about the madness of Soviet work camps, there's a collection of short stories called Kolyma Stories by Varlam Shalamov that is well-translated and quite moving.

https://smile.amazon.com/Kolyma-Stories-Review-Books-Classics/dp/1681372142/ref=sr_1_2?dchild=1&keywords=kolyma+tales&qid=1600691851&sr=8-2

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
11
10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
13
Hamberders 13 points ago +14 / -1

Good morning. Sunday morning.

What the hell did she mean by that?

7
Neptunes_rings 7 points ago +7 / -0

She has Groundhogzeimers.

2
djentropyhardcore 2 points ago +2 / -0

Underrated comment

2
wernerziegler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Micro-stroke.

2
DeusVultIntensifies 2 points ago +2 / -0

She was trying (and failing) to be playfully coy. Oh my- we can't tell you our plan- let me change the subject.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
daveinpublic 2 points ago +2 / -0

So interesting that Trump single handedly stopped the BLM riots. If you think about it, before he started talking about Law and Order, and forcing Slow Biden to either accept his talking point, they were winning. They strong armed America, and every one, every site and news station had to cower or be called a racist. Trump took a stand, people followed his lead, and instead of being called anti-black, we were called pro peace. He's very good at changing the narrative and not allowing anyone to dictate his image.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
fusreedah 6 points ago +6 / -0

They got freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it down, but they didn't agree on the first part, "pick the target", and picked too many.

They also didn't properly calculate the populace's beliefs because they were skewed by progressive social media. So when they tried to 'polarize it' around a point, so that 40% of people would fall on one side and 60% would fall on yours, they picked the centerpoint wrong and we got the 60% while they got the 40.

6
AugustineOfHippo 6 points ago +6 / -0

They should have focused on corona and the foodlines. They then jump on then Ahmaud Arbery case but then it lost steam so they went back to corona. Then Floyd, they half wanted to keep talking about corona, half wanted to push blm. Then the riot happen and they wanted to push that too. Commies want to keep people in fear, American don't take threats kindly.

37
MAGAPig 37 points ago +37 / -0

What little covid credibility is left is gonna be blown all to hell when democrat screaming banshees descend on the Capitol and try to disrupt the nomination hearings and senate vote. No social distancing. Few masks. Chanting,?yelling, other “super spreader” activities. Media and Dems will then try to spin a new narrative lie what, what, what, we never said this was a problem.

11
fasterth 11 points ago +11 / -0

well, if anything this shows they're getting scared even of creating false narratives. a patriotic SCOTUS might have ramifications that we can't even foresee atm.

5
wernerziegler 5 points ago +5 / -0

They showed just how scared they were when they suddenly dragged Joe Hiden out of the basement to denounce "violence on all sides", floated the USPS conspiracy theory, and had The Atlantic push out the supermarket tabloid smear articles about dead soldiers. An article so absurd only the unhinged Democratic base believed it. From here on out the Dems have entered violent hysteria. They are detached from reality and are pushing the limits on what qualifies as sedition.

2
daveinpublic 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think they're redpilling more people than they know. People who are getting tired of the animalistic tendencies of their own, the constant hate, the ugly virtue signaling.

29
Art-Vandelay41 29 points ago +29 / -0

The timeline has changed, there’s hope. The ol bitch actually did it.

17
Flipbarryfromreddit 17 points ago +17 / -0

He’s had the list done before he was even nominated by the republicans to be president!!!! Good to see CNN is finally calling Biden out on his shit! Fuck his lies!

12
TenScoops 12 points ago +12 / -0

after 99 lies and misrepresentations, they have to sprinkle in 1 actual news story, for credibility

8
Flipbarryfromreddit 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well said and so true, I’ve thought so myself. Now they can claim they’re “neutral”.... shame on them!

4
wernerziegler 4 points ago +4 / -0

They have made a lot of money off of Trump Derangement Syndrome. I'm still wondering if CNN won't pull a Judas late in the race, just to keep Trump in office and keep profiting off the Trump Deranged Left. I guess it depends how bad Zucker will have to decide whether he wants four more years of profitting off the mentally deranged left, or if he wants his guy in office but puts his job on the line due to the horrible ratings of a Harris administration with Sleepy Joe.

8
SkeletorsTeeth 8 points ago +8 / -0

Dr. Samuel Beckett still putting right what once went wrong...

5
ebuy123 5 points ago +5 / -0

getting RGB out of their network may be a bigger win than we realize. hillary clinton picked her out for bill to nominate. RGB made a disaster out of the SC. without her, would we even have "activist judges" ruining the country?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
daveinpublic 2 points ago +2 / -0

Roy G. Biv

14
LesboPregnancyScare 14 points ago +14 / -0

virus and the riots/BLM/Antifa. They started too early, but fuck, hopefully that is a lesson they dont learn for 2024

12
Wemann 12 points ago +12 / -0

And just like that, Democrats forgot about coronavirus

92
KekistanPM 92 points ago +93 / -1

Their internal polling must indicate that they need to throw voters a bone if they have a chance of winning.

And yes I also mean CNN because they're an arm of the Democrat party.

64
Modus_Pwninz 64 points ago +65 / -1

The problem is once people lose faith, they do not magically gain it back; they see all attempts to pull them back in as a farse meant only for that purpose.

Some of the most stringent atheists are those raised religious who felt betrayed by the dogma or how they were raised.

The media and political establishment is creating a society of people who will never trust either again so long as they live.

26
Skogin 26 points ago +26 / -0

This is exactly what we need.

28
Modus_Pwninz 28 points ago +28 / -0

I'm already there.

If you gave me a button and said pushing it would wipe out all media and politics forever, but I'd have to reap the consequences of life without both, I'd slap my dick on that button in a second.

11
iamjohnwick 11 points ago +11 / -0

My man!!

12
deleted 12 points ago +13 / -1
9
Necrovoter 9 points ago +10 / -1

Some of the most stringent atheists are those raised religious who felt betrayed by the dogma or how they were raised.

Or those who have tragically lost loved ones and thought God should have saved them. God gave up his only Son, letting enemies kill Him on a cross. We cannot fathom the reasons why, but just because we have lost someone doesn't mean God has forgotten or abandoned them. IMO, Matthew 10:29 says it best:

Οὐχὶ δύο στρουθία πωλεῖται ἀσσαρίου; καὶ οὐ ἓν ἐξ αὐτῶν πεσεῖται ἐπὶ τὴν γῆν ἄνευ ὑμῶν Πατρὸς.

"What is the price of two sparrows—one copper coin? But not a single sparrow can fall to the ground without your Father knowing it."

10
LesboPregnancyScare 10 points ago +10 / -0

I also mean CNN because they're an arm of the Democrat party.

Honestly I think its the other way around, the MSM is the democrats handlers.

10
Mammoth_Actuary 10 points ago +16 / -6

There is a group that owns both and we aren't allowed to criticize them

3
deleted 3 points ago +7 / -4
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
0
permissible_missile 0 points ago +4 / -4

We aren't allowed to criticize blacks, latinos, women, gays, trannies, the list goes on. So it seems your implication there isn't quite as effective as you think it is.

5
Mammoth_Actuary 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yes you are allowed to criticize those groups without being jailed

5
Italians_Invented_2A 5 points ago +5 / -0

Unless you're in the UK.

2
Mammoth_Actuary 2 points ago +4 / -2

You guys used to own half the world. What the fuck happened?

3
permissible_missile 3 points ago +4 / -1

I mean to me a criticism or accusation carries a lot more weight if it's individual rather than general. Then again, I'm not really a collectivist.

3
JohnVoight 3 points ago +3 / -0

What are you talking ab? I do it all the time 🤣

0
LesboPregnancyScare 0 points ago +1 / -1

the no Voltaire club

2
MSG1000 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, they both some secret masters they report to. They’re just different arms of the same thing.

70
deleted 70 points ago +70 / -0
24
deleted 24 points ago +25 / -1
15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
2
Wolfebane84 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't see a way to just rid ourselves of them voting doesn't seem to work, it's like were stuck with them forever.

7
bjjmike69 7 points ago +8 / -1

If it goes to the House, each state gets 2 votes 3 votes. If this happens, Trump wins like 30 of the states (which is a Trump victory).

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
HotRoastedNuts 7 points ago +7 / -0

Each state gets 3 votes. One for each state in the House and each Senator.

The contingent election procedure, along with the other parts of the presidential election process, was first established in Article Two, Section 1, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution, and then modified by the 12th Amendment in 1804. During a contingent election, each House state delegation casts one en bloc vote to determine the president, rather than a vote for each representative. Senators instead cast votes individually for vice president.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
4
ferd 4 points ago +4 / -0

Top article in The Atlantic today is about the long legal battle coming after the election. They’re trying to get everyone nice and used to the idea that the election will not be settled in November.

33
BoltBoltBoltBolt90 33 points ago +33 / -0

They're in panic, their last hope is to try and report a few minor negative Biden things to try and convince the general public that they're not biased.

32
Strategerium 32 points ago +32 / -0

Judging by the absolute shitstorm going on in FB and Twitter, I think the Dems realized the nagging wife/angry GF/crazy cat lady/handmaid larpers thing is a bad look and exactly the kind of social messaging that didn't work with Hillary. They can't go against that "feminist agenda" narrative, they are trying their best to shore up a couple of points before the next poll. So all of a sudden we have a "what media bias?" and "what trained marxists?" thing going on. Time to ask your normie friends how they think the messaging could be so consistent, and then so consistently pulled back? Do they still believe there is no media/BLM/Dem collusion?

12
RandomUzer 12 points ago +12 / -0

I got a few to at least question it with 'breaking news' and it was some random tweet from 4 days earlier. I would then deconstructed the top article for that day. They all follow predictable patterns. I would show what was left out and ask 'gee why did they leave that part out?' or 'oh look the smear one side downplay the importance of the other for the same act'. I also started calling 'timeout on that lets see what happens in 2 days'. Usually by that time the story was wildly different and we could talk about the changes. The downside is this method takes time and someone at least willing to listen. That never works on the internet. You can not show them facts. You show them they are being lied to. Constantly.

Everything that ends up in the news is fake. Almost all of it. Someone had to decide what was said. Put together a crew to write it, read it. film it, present it, artwork the transitions, edit, etc etc etc. It is a production company. They have it down so they can do it semi quickly. If they have a gap of 10 mins in the middle of a show grab one of the mad-lib news wire puff pieces and use that. Usually it is 80% there and can be quickly massaged into the local format. Fake.

230
sunnyingreenfield 230 points ago +231 / -1

No big deal, they are just laying the groundwork to switch him out

74
covfefe2525 74 points ago +74 / -0

Agreed.

54
Conserve1982 54 points ago +54 / -0

Way more likely scenario.

26
leakmouth 26 points ago +26 / -0

Too late isn’t it?

36
ProphetOfKek 36 points ago +37 / -1

Since when do dems care about rules?

21
leakmouth 21 points ago +21 / -0

If they try to switch now, aren’t they even more fucked?

24
ProphetOfKek 24 points ago +24 / -0

Since when have they been known to make good decisions this election cycle 😂

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
3
Italians_Invented_2A 3 points ago +4 / -1

It's never too late, because people vote for the party to select the electors and not the person of the candidate.

Technically they can even switch after election day.

7
TDCRedpill 7 points ago +7 / -0

If they know they're going to switch, they gain more advantage every day they wait to do it, no matter how bad it looks. If they switch in a miracle candidate (M.Obama, Oprah, Hillary, Bernie) they'll want to wait and bank on star power with little response from GOP. If they want Biden to be considered resigned day 1, they'll want GEOTUS chewing on Biden's carcass instead of Kamala who has to face off against a less threatening Pence on stage. I consider that the more likely situation.

5
Meddlesom 5 points ago +5 / -0

Pence will destroy Kamala too, just like he destroyed Tim Kaine. Remember in their debate when Pence asked Kaine a question that if Kaine had answered, it would out both him and Hillary as criminals and Kaine instantly started sweating and had to beg the moderator to change the subject?

3
DiscoverAFire 3 points ago +3 / -0

What was the question?

2
Gulfdream 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I don't think Pence is "less threatening" in any way.

6
Skogin 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes, and yes.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Italians_Invented_2A 4 points ago +4 / -0

Most normies would not vote for a new candidate at the last second. Normies would feel cheated, and also wouldn't want to vote for someone that didn't campaign, doesn't have a program, etc.

However, they might switch Biden after the elections.

3
boxmakingmachines 3 points ago +3 / -0

Count this as my prediction. Biden won’t be the candidate on Election Day. Republicans will have spent the entire campaign tearing down somebody who was never running in the first place, and whoever the candidate is (probably Harris), they will have got through the campaign without debating Trump.

I've been calling this for over a year.

Except I highly doubt they would give the presidency to Harris. She's a nobody and inspires zero confidence with established dem voters and normies alike.

I predict Big Mike will be replace Biden in about a month, forming an 'women' of color "superteam". The MSM will launch itself into furious circle jerk, the likes of which we have never seen.

Will normies be persuaded? Tough to say. But the above scenario seems 10000000x more likely than continuing to support a dementia patient who cannot even read off a teleprompter correctly anymore.

7
XirWokeMasterCuck 7 points ago +7 / -0

I keep hearing this but i just cant see that happening. The legal battle theyd have to fight wouldnt be worth the risk.

3
sunnyingreenfield 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think they're pretty desperate at this point. Now with the SC up for grabs even moreso

2
XirWokeMasterCuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great point. Who knows what they do. Now it’s what ? Cheat, change candidates, or stick the plan cause of the “polls”.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
3
wiombims 3 points ago +3 / -0

They put out contradictory information and low-key publish counters to their narrative so they can argue that there is no narrative and they're objective under historical scrutiny. The game is old.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
sunnyingreenfield 1 point ago +1 / -0

They will, but this is the start of "Is joe slipping?"

4
Jaqen 4 points ago +4 / -0

And when they swap Kamala in for Sleepy, she names Hillary as the VP.

185
stonepony 185 points ago +185 / -0

Don't be duped, this was all according to plan...

Turning on their sock-puppet candidate buys them credibility if they do it right, which makes it easier for them to slip the real candidate in.

They're going to turn his teleprompter off, in the next few days. Not because they suddenly became decent and want to do the right thing and oppose the pedo warmonger. But because he was never the real candidate in the first place.

40
covfefe2525 40 points ago +40 / -0

Yup.

36
deleted 36 points ago +36 / -0
32
emjayt 32 points ago +32 / -0

Who is the real candidate then? Hillary?

79
stonepony 79 points ago +79 / -0

Kamala.

And if you have a problem with that, if you think she should have gone through the primary process like anyone else, it's because you're racist and you hate women.

12
TRUMP4USA 12 points ago +12 / -0

But ballots have went out in many states, how will they handle that?

22
stonepony 22 points ago +22 / -0

They needed ballots to go out. If voting wasn't already underway, then Bernie/Tulsi/Yang have the legitimate claim.

Too late to start it over now though. Has to be Kamala.

5
KMacsBinder 5 points ago +5 / -0

She did go through the primary process and the voters dismissed her entirely.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
8
Harambe 8 points ago +8 / -0

She runs the DNC tho. So she's always first in my mind. Until the election is done and over, I'll still think she's about to be swapped in. I'm not kidding.

5
Italians_Invented_2A 5 points ago +5 / -0

They can bring Hillary after the elections, after people have voted for Biden.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
Deplorable_Badger 4 points ago +4 / -0

Michelle Obama.

13
stonepony 13 points ago +13 / -0

Kamala is Mike's surrogate.

Remember Juicy lynched himself in order to get Kamala's bullshit anti-lynching bill passed?

Who called Chicago and pulled strings to have all the charges dropped? Mike's top personal aid, who also happened to be a relative of Juicy Smollet.

Coincidences though, all coincidences.

4
Kingspain 4 points ago +4 / -0

Uncle Jesse's mullet

4
Skogin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Richard Madcow

20
leakmouth 20 points ago +20 / -0

Agreed all except for according to plan. This was NOT the plan. They thought they could drag him across the finish line and did not expect his rapid decline and progression of his dementia. He was the most “electable” but watching him now I realize that they could not have picked a worse candidate. The fake Mexican or that Buttgay guy or my 9 year old daughter would’ve been better. At least they can all read a fucking teleprompter

12
stonepony 12 points ago +12 / -0

He was always supposed to be a "transitional candidate". That was their own words.

Before the election or after the election, they knew he was ill and deteriorating. A deteriorating temp candidate gives them the excuse to anoint whomever they like, without them having to win through the primaries.

Before he steps down, you'll see the MSDNC start telling the truth about him. About his track record, and his condition. And they'll pretend they're telling the truth because they're good honest journalists. And you'll see posts like this one from the OP. Amazed to see CNN doing the right thing. etc.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
dingdongbob 5 points ago +5 / -0

There was no way that he was the most electable candidate. I firmly believe Sanders was the only real opposition to Trump, and that was due to his passion and consistency. Bootygay (or whatever is name was) was a close second, but he was so fake that he would've easily been obliterated by Trump. The dems knew this as well, which is why they cheated Sanders out of the nomination twice.

They panicked and pushed Biden through when they saw Sanders winning early on. I don't think they expected his mental decline to happen so quickly, though. I laughed when the media tried to push him through as the "most electable." As if swing voters will choose for this piece of wet cardboard over the high energy Trump.

8
swarleybing 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yep. Bernie won the first three primaries - Biden finished fourth in Iowa, and an embarrassing FIFTH in New Hampshire. He was all but finished. How can you be a serious candidate when a blue state prefers four other people ahead of you?

Then the DNC had an emergency meeting, got all the smaller candidates - Buttigieg, Harris and co. to drop out and support Biden. And miraculously, Biden started winning (though Bernie still won CA). Bernie should be fucking livid and ought to be running as a third party to screw them. They've done it to him twice now! At his age, what does he have to lose?

7
Minarchist_Manlet 7 points ago +7 / -0

Sanders is no longer principled, assuming he ever was. He sold out.

5
Italians_Invented_2A 5 points ago +5 / -0

The fact that Bernie was popular among Democrats does not mean he has more chances than Biden in a general election.

Someone who calls himself a socialist is still difficult to elect for Independent voters, let alone Republicans that they are trying to win over.

I genuinely believe Biden was the best candidate they had, by far.

And to answer the previous poster, blacks and hispanics wouldn't vote for a homo.

4
RandomUzer 4 points ago +4 / -0

One of the other 4 progressives was more electable than him and Kamala. Biden/Kamala is the 'bury all the crap we did since 2008' candidate. I do not see someone like Sanders going to bat for them too much. They could not control him. Biden they can, he has always been a party man. It became pretty clear months ago Biden is not all there. So they are planing to 25th him. Ginsberg ending up in hospice a few weeks ago changes the whole thing with the cheat they want to pull. They may need to change it up a bit and switch out who the primary candidate is. But that will cause a shitstorm with the green party and West. and rightfully so. Never mind what the RNC would do too. Switchout is too late at this point. 25th amendment is their plan they are committed to it wither they like it or not.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
AlohaSnackbar 6 points ago +6 / -0

If, and it's a big IF at this point (although I was leaning towards it being likely earlier) they are planning to switch out candidates, then they are cornholing themselves with frozen porcupines every day they wait.

Some people have already voted. Most for Joe, (Real Americans do their best to follow the constitution and vote on Nov 3, military and old/sick/infirm should all get absentee ballots) and every single day, more of those ballots get cast/sent in with Joe's name. Mass mail in ballots are already printed with Joe's name, regular ballots also already printed.

So as we tick, tick, tick closer to election day, more and more dem votes get wasted. And there are fewer and fewer opportunities to reprint and send new ballots out to those who haven't voted yet, leaving "write in" as the only option. Good fucking luck getting THAT done on a large scale.

I'm not saying it's impossible he'll be switched out at this point, but it's getting more and more unlikely by the day.

4
stonepony 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think you're looking at it the wrong way.

Notice Biden and Kamala have both referred to it as a Kamala/Biden ticket?

It only works if the switch takes place after the election, or after the voting is significantly underway.

Otherwise, Bernie/Tulsi/Yang get swapped in.

They're already good. They're already set. Biden can fuck off at any moment, and Kamala will take over, because she's a strong female POC, and she'll pick a new VP and all the votes already cast are for Kamala.

3
stonepony 3 points ago +3 / -0

Teleprompter failure will be the big tell. IMO.

Or it will be an MSDNC "journalist" with an off-script curve-ball question that they weren't supposed to ask. They'll tell Joe it was a communications snafu and there was a mix up with the pre-approved questions.

Behind the scenes, before the big teleprompter oopsie or the unexpected question, Joe's doctors will dial back his cocktail of make-Joe-lucid drugs.

2
Italians_Invented_2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

I keep saying this: it doesn't matter what the ballot says because the American people do not vote for the person of the President.

103
Whoopies_tds 103 points ago +103 / -0

Biden really is a pathological liar

45
deleted 45 points ago +45 / -0
14
leakmouth 14 points ago +14 / -0

And remember “it’s not a lie if you believe it!” -Costanza

5
SellTheSun 5 points ago +5 / -0

Except he's been lying like this for the past 4 decades

3
Skogin 3 points ago +4 / -1

It is not a lie, if you have no lucid frame of reference.

8
dubler6 8 points ago +8 / -0

It’s not a lie if you believe it.

4
wiombims 4 points ago +4 / -0

Do you really believe Joe is actually senile or is it really convenient that you can't remember the dirty deals that made your fortune, the fortune of your family and the fortunes of your children? He may be going senile but even senile people slip up sometimes and Joe isn't slipping up on his story regarding legal jeopardies. He's going senile about everything except the things tha thave to do with his money and corruption.

3
ProphetOfKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

Confabulator

2
Trump2011 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unless he's telling the truth and RBG died months ago...

2
zabbers 2 points ago +2 / -0

I dunno, so is CNN. If CNN says it's false I'm starting to think it's true.

77
George_Soros 77 points ago +77 / -0

This mother fucker cant even remember his wife from his sister. Can you blame him? I tell him every morning that sniffing kids in public is bad for our image, and you can see what good that has done for me.

15
CarpenterRichard 15 points ago +15 / -0

Lol 😂

11
The_Litehaus_Abides 11 points ago +11 / -0

Thank you for the input George!

7
Skogin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Go to hell, George!

10
George_Soros 10 points ago +10 / -0

I've been living hell ever since Trump got elected. You know how hard he makes my job? I miss the old lil bitch Republicans like Romney and McCain.

3
AlohaSnackbar 3 points ago +3 / -0

This mother fucker cant even remember his wife from his sister. Can you blame him?

Jesus, he fucks his mother, sister, AND wife? What is he, a Biden?

51
6
Italians_Invented_2A 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thank you for the article, and archived.

39
I-am-but-an-egg 39 points ago +40 / -1

Correct little things so you can say you are being equal

13
Destineed369 13 points ago +13 / -0

They have to eventually. Even a moron would realize they’re wrong 100% of the time. So they tell the truth a time or to so they can point an say see we’re impartial”

31
deleted 31 points ago +32 / -1
9
EpicPede 9 points ago +9 / -0

50-60*

6
MAGAMoose 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's the beginning of what we all knew would happen.

Biden will be off the ticket before the first debate.

I just wonder what happens with all the ballots that have been printed and mailed or are otherwise locked in.

27
FluffiPuff 27 points ago +27 / -0

OR maybe Biden's telling the TRUTH for once, and Ginsberg was already dead

6
TRUMP4USA 6 points ago +6 / -0

exactly!

4
rob0Pede 4 points ago +4 / -0

This comment should be higher

23
GulagDweller 23 points ago +23 / -0

Any surprise a life long liar would lie? Every Hiden Biden commercial, I have to painfully live through, on TV and computer are all filled with 100% lies.

22
mikejones 22 points ago +22 / -0

CNN meanwhile created an article trying to keep the pandemic going today

2
Skogin 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s pathetic.

Tony Heller should be on PBS.

But we are in 🤡🌍.

21
sagebrushfire 21 points ago +21 / -0

Just a pathetic attempt at looking credible. It resonates with no one. We know they’re a 5th column and the lunatics on Reddit only believe Das Kapital.

17
FitOfficial 17 points ago +17 / -0

I mean he might be right depending on when she actually died.

13
Mr_Man 13 points ago +13 / -0

Is it possible they completed a patch for the 2020 simulation?

4
Skogin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Negative. It is really still 2015.

https://thedonald.win/p/HXjzx5Cb/

11
Supersaiyanbroly737 11 points ago +11 / -0

Fake News CNN attempting to re-gain some confidence and credibility, trying to look fair and balanced before their next big lie. Probably in October, when it matters the most.

10
JustHereForTheSalmon 10 points ago +10 / -0

That he had his SCOTUS pick list two weeks ago proves Trump is a Time Lord.

Change my mind.

5
wiombims 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'd like to but that's a hot take and I'm adding it to stable jenius doctor dimensional chessmaster god emperor blessed man of the people description list. If only because every Dr Who fan I've met is a leftist who would be incredibly triggered by that. First Trump took the magic wand from the muggles and now he's ruining another fandom for the left. There will be no safe space left to hide in by the end of his 7000AD reign. You win this one, change my mind bear!

9
RumorControl 9 points ago +9 / -0

The News starting to report actual news would honestly be the most unsettling thing ever if only because i'd be MORE suspicious of Something Else being covered up..

9
ThirteenPercenter 9 points ago +9 / -0

Harmless Biden gaffe. This is so CNN can say “hey look we’re negative on Biden, too!”

8
fapoo 8 points ago +8 / -0

2 + 2 = 5?

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
TehAgent 6 points ago +6 / -0

There’s really NO impact to Joe no matter what. People that are voting for him are just voting against Trump. They don’t care who they are voting for; they just care who they are voting against.

7
Plebbitimmigrant 7 points ago +7 / -0

Somedays feels like I’ve entered the fucking twilight zone

6
contrarianism 6 points ago +6 / -0

Double Negatives™

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
ExileOnRedditStreet 6 points ago +6 / -0

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

6
Silencemennow 6 points ago +6 / -0

CNN = THE MOST TRUTHFUL SOURCE

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
raid 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is a throw away fact check. They decided they had to have one truthful check.

5
Thegreatestrecovery 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ik,r?

5
FireannDireach 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tides been turning for a bit now. It's gotten so gross with Biden and BLM and everything, they're probably seeing their ratings plummet, and seeing the polls showing Trumps gonna win.

It's not a sure thing, but i feel way more confident than I did 3 months ago. Notice how rioting is completely off the headlines? They fucked up. Hard.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
TRUMP4USA 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was on the front page, col. 3

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
Drew 5 points ago +5 / -0

After thousands of signs it took cnn actually being somewhat truthful for the great awakening to begin.

4
jcd_007 4 points ago +4 / -0

CNN. Fact checked. Biden. What reality is this?

4
The_Kuru 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's a reason that this scared the crap out of CNN and they had to say Biden was wrong about the timeline. They are worried Joe could spill the beans on Ginsburg's actual time of death because of his senility.

4
The_Kuru 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump should tweet: "Is Sleepy Joe claiming that Justice Ginsburg died months ago?" and then show the timeline.

4
Redpill-notCommieRed 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well she's been dead for weeks confirmed by Biden lol

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
GG_Escalator 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe they are discrediting him in preparation for the old switcheroo?

4
Jcholl9 4 points ago +4 / -0

You know what I find amazing... Biden actually managed to say a complete sentence recently without screwing up.

Biden: "I should be the one who nominates Justice Ginsberg's successor..." During a campaign stop in Philadelphia. Truly amazing!

3
Choppermagic 3 points ago +3 / -0

CNN pushing for Kamala to take over

3
TrumpMagaNoBama 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're throwing Plugs under the bus, because they're getting ready to get rid of him!

3
bubble_bursts 3 points ago +4 / -1

Not surprising because this is the end-game in the current pre-election 4D chess game. I had commented recently:

The only play for the media at this point is to stop gaslighting and start being honest, or else risk becoming completely irrelevant.

And they are finally getting there, kicking and screaming. The only question is, do people have short memories ?

"Democracy" is only as good as the people in it.

3
fallhollow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Has hell frozen over?

2
Conner 2 points ago +2 / -0

They won’t turn into conservative news network with one good fact check.

2
polish_snausage 2 points ago +2 / -0

It could be true.... she died ages ago

2
Crisis83 2 points ago +2 / -0

Btw the campeign cut this part out if the video they shared.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
ChrisSuperDude 2 points ago +2 / -0

CNN is telling the truth? Ok which one of you fucks slipped me some acid?

2
BananaWizard 2 points ago +2 / -0

They have to keep being credible because trump makes them money. They WANT trump to win, the last 2 weeks watch. CNN will flip to assist trump then go back to bashing him for money.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Loiuzein 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is nothing CNN can do to alleviate my desire to nuke them.